从例外到规范?分析1989年以来索非亚和基辅的封闭式住宅

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1553/MOEGG162S91
Christian Smigiel, Konstyantyn Mezentsev, N. Provotar
{"title":"从例外到规范?分析1989年以来索非亚和基辅的封闭式住宅","authors":"Christian Smigiel, Konstyantyn Mezentsev, N. Provotar","doi":"10.1553/MOEGG162S91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thirty years after the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989 it is time to start a broader reflection on one of the most debated types of housing in Eastern European urban studies. Gated housing was almost unknown in the 1990s but started spreading rapidly at the end of the 2000s in different Eastern European and Post-Soviet countries. However, the 2008–2009 global financial crisis led to a sharp decrease in housing construction in general and of gated communities in particular. In recent years, housing construction as well as housing prices have increased again. Gated communities are part of this recovery. Instead of providing insights from a certain period of boom or crisis, this paper looks at three decades of housing production in general and gated communities in particular. It tries to uncover the institutional and economic background of housing development over the last 30 years. Moreover, it relates these developments to two (South)-Eastern European capital cities (Sofia and Kiev [Kyiv]) and their pathways of housing and gated community production. We focus on politico-economic and socio-spatial relationalities in these two different context conditions and scrutinise why and how gated communities emerged as well as how supply and demand changed over time. Both cases represent rather peripheral, capitalist economies concerning their national background. However, both cases are capital cities, which absorb the majority of capital investment. The polarisation and concentration of political and economic power structures lead us to discuss different actor-constellations regarding this on-going flight to privatopia, reflecting on the role of urban planning as well as glocal housing markets. Last but not least, this paper shows that gated communities are “urban assemblages” of wider processes of peripherialisation.","PeriodicalId":44373,"journal":{"name":"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft","volume":"29 1","pages":"91-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Exception to Norm? Analysing Gated Housing in Sofia and Kiev since 1989\",\"authors\":\"Christian Smigiel, Konstyantyn Mezentsev, N. Provotar\",\"doi\":\"10.1553/MOEGG162S91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thirty years after the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989 it is time to start a broader reflection on one of the most debated types of housing in Eastern European urban studies. Gated housing was almost unknown in the 1990s but started spreading rapidly at the end of the 2000s in different Eastern European and Post-Soviet countries. However, the 2008–2009 global financial crisis led to a sharp decrease in housing construction in general and of gated communities in particular. In recent years, housing construction as well as housing prices have increased again. Gated communities are part of this recovery. Instead of providing insights from a certain period of boom or crisis, this paper looks at three decades of housing production in general and gated communities in particular. It tries to uncover the institutional and economic background of housing development over the last 30 years. Moreover, it relates these developments to two (South)-Eastern European capital cities (Sofia and Kiev [Kyiv]) and their pathways of housing and gated community production. We focus on politico-economic and socio-spatial relationalities in these two different context conditions and scrutinise why and how gated communities emerged as well as how supply and demand changed over time. Both cases represent rather peripheral, capitalist economies concerning their national background. However, both cases are capital cities, which absorb the majority of capital investment. The polarisation and concentration of political and economic power structures lead us to discuss different actor-constellations regarding this on-going flight to privatopia, reflecting on the role of urban planning as well as glocal housing markets. Last but not least, this paper shows that gated communities are “urban assemblages” of wider processes of peripherialisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"91-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1553/MOEGG162S91\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/MOEGG162S91","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1989年柏林墙倒塌30年后,是时候开始对东欧城市研究中最具争议的住房类型之一进行更广泛的反思了。封闭式住宅在20世纪90年代几乎不为人知,但在2000年代末开始在不同的东欧和后苏联国家迅速蔓延。然而,2008-2009年的全球金融危机导致了住房建设的急剧减少,尤其是封闭式社区。近年来,住房建设和房价再次上涨。封闭社区是这种复苏的一部分。本文没有从某个繁荣时期或危机时期提供见解,而是从总体上考察了三十年来的住房生产情况,特别是封闭式社区。它试图揭示过去30年住房发展的制度和经济背景。此外,它将这些发展与两个(南)东欧首都城市(索非亚和基辅)及其住房和封闭式社区生产的途径联系起来。我们关注这两种不同背景条件下的政治经济和社会空间关系,并仔细研究封闭式社区的出现原因和方式,以及供需如何随着时间的推移而变化。这两个例子都代表了相对边缘的资本主义经济,就其国家背景而言。然而,这两种情况都是首都城市,吸收了大部分的资本投资。政治和经济权力结构的两极分化和集中使我们讨论了关于这种持续向私人乌托邦的转变的不同行为者星座,反映了城市规划和全球住房市场的作用。最后但并非最不重要的是,本文表明,封闭社区是更广泛的外围化过程的“城市组合”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Exception to Norm? Analysing Gated Housing in Sofia and Kiev since 1989
Thirty years after the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989 it is time to start a broader reflection on one of the most debated types of housing in Eastern European urban studies. Gated housing was almost unknown in the 1990s but started spreading rapidly at the end of the 2000s in different Eastern European and Post-Soviet countries. However, the 2008–2009 global financial crisis led to a sharp decrease in housing construction in general and of gated communities in particular. In recent years, housing construction as well as housing prices have increased again. Gated communities are part of this recovery. Instead of providing insights from a certain period of boom or crisis, this paper looks at three decades of housing production in general and gated communities in particular. It tries to uncover the institutional and economic background of housing development over the last 30 years. Moreover, it relates these developments to two (South)-Eastern European capital cities (Sofia and Kiev [Kyiv]) and their pathways of housing and gated community production. We focus on politico-economic and socio-spatial relationalities in these two different context conditions and scrutinise why and how gated communities emerged as well as how supply and demand changed over time. Both cases represent rather peripheral, capitalist economies concerning their national background. However, both cases are capital cities, which absorb the majority of capital investment. The polarisation and concentration of political and economic power structures lead us to discuss different actor-constellations regarding this on-going flight to privatopia, reflecting on the role of urban planning as well as glocal housing markets. Last but not least, this paper shows that gated communities are “urban assemblages” of wider processes of peripherialisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
From Exception to Norm? Analysing Gated Housing in Sofia and Kiev since 1989 The Urban Transformations of Post-Yugoslavia: Negotiating the Contemporary City in Sarajevo, Belgrade, and Zagreb Transferring the Territorial Cohesion Ideal of Integrated Polycentric Development in the Light of Peripheralisation – Insights from Romania Wanderungsmotive ausgewählter Bevölkerungsgruppen in Kärnten Multiple Dimensions of Mediatised Translocal Social Practices. A Case Study of Domestic Migrants in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1