脱敏剂、临时粘结剂和牙本质清洁方法对自蚀刻/粘合树脂粘结剂与牙本质结合强度的影响:一项体外研究

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Oral Research Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1177/23202068211052796
Mehmet Uğur, İ. Kavut, Şafak Külünk, Mehmet Şerif Akdeniz, Özgür Ozan Tanrıkut
{"title":"脱敏剂、临时粘结剂和牙本质清洁方法对自蚀刻/粘合树脂粘结剂与牙本质结合强度的影响:一项体外研究","authors":"Mehmet Uğur, İ. Kavut, Şafak Külünk, Mehmet Şerif Akdeniz, Özgür Ozan Tanrıkut","doi":"10.1177/23202068211052796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of desensitizer, temporary cements, dentin cleaning methods on shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Four hundred eighty buccal or lingual/palatine coronal portions of human molar teeth were mounted in the acrylic blocks. Teeth surfaces were prepared until the dentin was exposed. Specimens were divided into four groups. One group separated as control and three groups of teeth were treated with a desensitizing agent containing calcium-phosphate desensitizer (Teethmate Desensitizer, TMD), resin-based self-reinforcing monomer (Shield Force Plus, SFP) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma Desensitizer). Two different temporary cement containing calcium hydroxide (Dycall) and zinc oxide based (Rely X Temp NE) temporary cement were applied to the dentin surfaces. Temporary cement was removed with one of three cleansing techniques: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and glass particles containing agent (Consepsis Scrub), cleansing bur (OptiClean), and ıntra/extracoronal rotary brush (Starbrush). All groups were further divided into two cementation subgroups (Panavia V5 and Panavia SA). The SBS (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed statistically with a four-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test (α = 0.05). Results: Although SFP showed higher SBS, there was no statistically significant difference between other groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences between temporary cements (P > .05). OptiClean rotary bur showed higher mean SBS values in all groups. The dual-polymerized Panavia V5 showed the highest SBS values in all groups (P <.05). Conclusion: Cleaning of dentin surface from temporary cement remnants with a silicon bur and dual-cure resin cement showed the highest bond strength values.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Uğur, İ. Kavut, Şafak Külünk, Mehmet Şerif Akdeniz, Özgür Ozan Tanrıkut\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23202068211052796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of desensitizer, temporary cements, dentin cleaning methods on shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Four hundred eighty buccal or lingual/palatine coronal portions of human molar teeth were mounted in the acrylic blocks. Teeth surfaces were prepared until the dentin was exposed. Specimens were divided into four groups. One group separated as control and three groups of teeth were treated with a desensitizing agent containing calcium-phosphate desensitizer (Teethmate Desensitizer, TMD), resin-based self-reinforcing monomer (Shield Force Plus, SFP) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma Desensitizer). Two different temporary cement containing calcium hydroxide (Dycall) and zinc oxide based (Rely X Temp NE) temporary cement were applied to the dentin surfaces. Temporary cement was removed with one of three cleansing techniques: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and glass particles containing agent (Consepsis Scrub), cleansing bur (OptiClean), and ıntra/extracoronal rotary brush (Starbrush). All groups were further divided into two cementation subgroups (Panavia V5 and Panavia SA). The SBS (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed statistically with a four-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test (α = 0.05). Results: Although SFP showed higher SBS, there was no statistically significant difference between other groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences between temporary cements (P > .05). OptiClean rotary bur showed higher mean SBS values in all groups. The dual-polymerized Panavia V5 showed the highest SBS values in all groups (P <.05). Conclusion: Cleaning of dentin surface from temporary cement remnants with a silicon bur and dual-cure resin cement showed the highest bond strength values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Oral Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068211052796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068211052796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价脱敏剂、临时粘结剂、牙本质清洁方法对自蚀自粘树脂粘结剂与牙本质剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。材料和方法:将480颗人臼齿的颊部或舌/腭冠部固定在丙烯酸块中。准备牙齿表面,直到露出牙本质。标本分为四组。其中一组作为对照组,另外三组牙齿分别使用含有磷酸钙脱敏剂(Teethmate desensitizer, TMD)、树脂基自增强单体(Shield Force Plus, SFP)和2-羟乙基甲基丙烯酸酯和戊二醛(Gluma脱敏剂)的脱敏剂进行治疗。将两种不同的含氢氧化钙(Dycall)和氧化锌(Rely X Temp NE)的临时水泥应用于牙本质表面。使用三种清洁技术中的一种去除临时水泥:2%二光酸氯己定和含玻璃颗粒的剂(Consepsis Scrub)、清洁bur (OptiClean)和ıntra/冠外旋转刷(Starbrush)。各组进一步分为两个胶结亚组(Panavia V5和Panavia SA)。采用万能试验机,以0.5 mm/min的十字速度测量SBS (MPa)。采用四向方差分析和Tukey’s Honest显著差异检验(α = 0.05)对数据进行统计学分析。结果:SFP组的SBS较高,但其他组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两种临时骨水泥间的差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。OptiClean旋转bur在所有组中显示较高的平均SBS值。双聚合Panavia V5组的SBS值最高(P < 0.05)。结论:用硅骨棒和双固化树脂水泥土清洁牙本质表面时,牙本质表面的粘接强度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/ Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of desensitizer, temporary cements, dentin cleaning methods on shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Four hundred eighty buccal or lingual/palatine coronal portions of human molar teeth were mounted in the acrylic blocks. Teeth surfaces were prepared until the dentin was exposed. Specimens were divided into four groups. One group separated as control and three groups of teeth were treated with a desensitizing agent containing calcium-phosphate desensitizer (Teethmate Desensitizer, TMD), resin-based self-reinforcing monomer (Shield Force Plus, SFP) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma Desensitizer). Two different temporary cement containing calcium hydroxide (Dycall) and zinc oxide based (Rely X Temp NE) temporary cement were applied to the dentin surfaces. Temporary cement was removed with one of three cleansing techniques: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and glass particles containing agent (Consepsis Scrub), cleansing bur (OptiClean), and ıntra/extracoronal rotary brush (Starbrush). All groups were further divided into two cementation subgroups (Panavia V5 and Panavia SA). The SBS (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed statistically with a four-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test (α = 0.05). Results: Although SFP showed higher SBS, there was no statistically significant difference between other groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences between temporary cements (P > .05). OptiClean rotary bur showed higher mean SBS values in all groups. The dual-polymerized Panavia V5 showed the highest SBS values in all groups (P <.05). Conclusion: Cleaning of dentin surface from temporary cement remnants with a silicon bur and dual-cure resin cement showed the highest bond strength values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Microbiological and Immunological Assessment of Peri-implant Sites in Healthy and Diabetic Individuals After Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Prospective Case Control Study Translucency and Color Difference of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: The Effect of Surface Finishing on Background Color Effects of Fluoride Varnish on Roughness of Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins at Different Temperatures: An In Vitro Study Synthesis and Characterization of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles Based on Hemidesmus Indicus Extract: Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Bioactivity for Prosthetic Implant Coatings Comparative Evaluation of Penetrability of Various Bioceramic Sealers into the Tubules of Radicular Dentin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1