对低无机砷暴露的欧洲人口的健康风险没有明确的关切(概述)

Z. Šlejkovec, T. Bizjak, M. Horvat, I. Falnoga
{"title":"对低无机砷暴露的欧洲人口的健康风险没有明确的关切(概述)","authors":"Z. Šlejkovec, T. Bizjak, M. Horvat, I. Falnoga","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2022.2143319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An overview of recent European background inorganic arsenic (iAs) levels and related human health risks is given. The main aim was to summarize and confront the existing concentration data, unresolved low dose-response issues (linearity, nonlinearity, threshold, adaptation, hormesis), and methodological approaches hampered by several uncertainties on several levels. Daily doses are calculated from dietary intake (food, water As content multiplied by intake frequencies) and compared by reverse calculated doses from urine iAs metabolites (iAs + dimethylarsenic acid + monomethylarsonic acid) from human biomonitoring data (both in a range 0.05–0.60 μg kg−1 bw/day for children, adolescents and adults). With data obtained a health risk assessment is performed by existing regulation norms. Several flaws are addressed. For instance, urine DMA used as iAs metabolite is overestimated as its source can also be food items. Further, existing regulation norms (which are under reevaluation by US EPA) are based on a linear dose-response approach valid for high exposure only and highly questionable at low exposure levels. Nevertheless, even by using the conventional approaches with discussed flaws leading to anticipated overestimation, the potential cancer risk was estimated to be of low concern regarding the margins of exposure (MOE) for investigated age groups with average food intake and average iAs concentration in diet (15.3–40.6), supported by MOE calculated from human biomonitoring data (21.4).","PeriodicalId":13141,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"245 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No clear concerns related to health risks in the European population with low inorganic arsenic exposure (overview)\",\"authors\":\"Z. Šlejkovec, T. Bizjak, M. Horvat, I. Falnoga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10807039.2022.2143319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract An overview of recent European background inorganic arsenic (iAs) levels and related human health risks is given. The main aim was to summarize and confront the existing concentration data, unresolved low dose-response issues (linearity, nonlinearity, threshold, adaptation, hormesis), and methodological approaches hampered by several uncertainties on several levels. Daily doses are calculated from dietary intake (food, water As content multiplied by intake frequencies) and compared by reverse calculated doses from urine iAs metabolites (iAs + dimethylarsenic acid + monomethylarsonic acid) from human biomonitoring data (both in a range 0.05–0.60 μg kg−1 bw/day for children, adolescents and adults). With data obtained a health risk assessment is performed by existing regulation norms. Several flaws are addressed. For instance, urine DMA used as iAs metabolite is overestimated as its source can also be food items. Further, existing regulation norms (which are under reevaluation by US EPA) are based on a linear dose-response approach valid for high exposure only and highly questionable at low exposure levels. Nevertheless, even by using the conventional approaches with discussed flaws leading to anticipated overestimation, the potential cancer risk was estimated to be of low concern regarding the margins of exposure (MOE) for investigated age groups with average food intake and average iAs concentration in diet (15.3–40.6), supported by MOE calculated from human biomonitoring data (21.4).\",\"PeriodicalId\":13141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"245 - 283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2143319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2143319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要概述了最近欧洲背景无机砷(iAs)水平和相关的人类健康风险。主要目的是总结和面对现有的浓度数据,未解决的低剂量反应问题(线性,非线性,阈值,适应,激效),以及在几个层面上受到几个不确定因素阻碍的方法方法。每日剂量根据膳食摄入量(食物、水中砷含量乘以摄入频率)计算,并与人体生物监测数据中尿液砷代谢物(砷+二甲基larsenic酸+单甲基larsonic酸)的反向计算剂量进行比较(儿童、青少年和成人的剂量范围均为0.05-0.60 μg kg - 1 bw/天)。根据获得的数据,根据现有法规规范进行健康风险评估。解决了几个缺陷。例如,作为iAs代谢物的尿液DMA被高估了,因为它的来源也可能是食物。此外,现有的监管规范(正在由美国环境保护局重新评估)基于线性剂量反应方法,仅对高暴露有效,对低暴露水平非常可疑。然而,即使使用常规方法(存在讨论过的缺陷,导致预期的高估),根据人类生物监测数据计算的MOE(21.4),对于平均食物摄入量和饮食中平均iAs浓度(15.3-40.6)的被调查年龄组,潜在的癌症风险估计与暴露边际(MOE)有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No clear concerns related to health risks in the European population with low inorganic arsenic exposure (overview)
Abstract An overview of recent European background inorganic arsenic (iAs) levels and related human health risks is given. The main aim was to summarize and confront the existing concentration data, unresolved low dose-response issues (linearity, nonlinearity, threshold, adaptation, hormesis), and methodological approaches hampered by several uncertainties on several levels. Daily doses are calculated from dietary intake (food, water As content multiplied by intake frequencies) and compared by reverse calculated doses from urine iAs metabolites (iAs + dimethylarsenic acid + monomethylarsonic acid) from human biomonitoring data (both in a range 0.05–0.60 μg kg−1 bw/day for children, adolescents and adults). With data obtained a health risk assessment is performed by existing regulation norms. Several flaws are addressed. For instance, urine DMA used as iAs metabolite is overestimated as its source can also be food items. Further, existing regulation norms (which are under reevaluation by US EPA) are based on a linear dose-response approach valid for high exposure only and highly questionable at low exposure levels. Nevertheless, even by using the conventional approaches with discussed flaws leading to anticipated overestimation, the potential cancer risk was estimated to be of low concern regarding the margins of exposure (MOE) for investigated age groups with average food intake and average iAs concentration in diet (15.3–40.6), supported by MOE calculated from human biomonitoring data (21.4).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental implication identification on water quality variation and human health risk assessment in the middle and lower reaches of the Hanjiang River, China Estimation of glyphosate biological half-life among farmers and residents in Thailand Integrating ecosystem service value in the disclosure of landscape ecological risk changes: a case study in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China Exposure level and risk assessment of atrazine in Chinese adults based on the systematic review data and the Monte Carlo simulation method A novel biomonitoring method to detect pyrethroid metabolites in saliva of occupationally exposed workers as a tool for risk assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1