{"title":"无随机神谕的HIBE和HIBS密码分析与改进","authors":"Xiaoming Hu, Tong Wang, Huajie Xu","doi":"10.1109/MVHI.2010.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Au et al. proposed a practical HIBE scheme and a hierarchical identity-based signature (HIBS) scheme. They claimed that both their schemes were proven to be secure without relying on random oracle. However, in this paper, we show that their HIBE scheme is not chosen plaintext attack (CPA) secure. We also point out that their HIBS scheme does not possess the unforgeability property, and there is one mistake in their security proof. In order to overcome these drawbacks, we propose an improved method.","PeriodicalId":34860,"journal":{"name":"HumanMachine Communication Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryptanalysis and Improvement of a HIBE and HIBS without Random Oracles\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoming Hu, Tong Wang, Huajie Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MVHI.2010.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, Au et al. proposed a practical HIBE scheme and a hierarchical identity-based signature (HIBS) scheme. They claimed that both their schemes were proven to be secure without relying on random oracle. However, in this paper, we show that their HIBE scheme is not chosen plaintext attack (CPA) secure. We also point out that their HIBS scheme does not possess the unforgeability property, and there is one mistake in their security proof. In order to overcome these drawbacks, we propose an improved method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HumanMachine Communication Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HumanMachine Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MVHI.2010.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HumanMachine Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MVHI.2010.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cryptanalysis and Improvement of a HIBE and HIBS without Random Oracles
Recently, Au et al. proposed a practical HIBE scheme and a hierarchical identity-based signature (HIBS) scheme. They claimed that both their schemes were proven to be secure without relying on random oracle. However, in this paper, we show that their HIBE scheme is not chosen plaintext attack (CPA) secure. We also point out that their HIBS scheme does not possess the unforgeability property, and there is one mistake in their security proof. In order to overcome these drawbacks, we propose an improved method.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
