{"title":"一种非标准类型的词缀重排","authors":"N. Stoynova","doi":"10.1075/sl.19070.sto","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper deals with the restrictive (limitative) marker kə̄n ‘only’ in Ulcha (Southern Tungusic). This\n marker has nontrivial positional features: it can attach before inflectional suffixes (as a derivational affix) or after them (as an\n enclitic). One might see the process of affix reordering described in Haspelmath (1993) as\n “externalization of inflection”, when a former clitic becomes a derivational affix. However, there is evidence that the uses of\n kə̄n after inflection are innovative as compared to those before inflection, not vice versa, and this direction of\n diachronic development is very unexpected. In this paper, I propose an explanation for this nonstandard reordering pattern and show that in\n fact it has the same motivation and the same mechanisms as previously reported types of affix reordering.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nonstandard type of affix reordering\",\"authors\":\"N. Stoynova\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/sl.19070.sto\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper deals with the restrictive (limitative) marker kə̄n ‘only’ in Ulcha (Southern Tungusic). This\\n marker has nontrivial positional features: it can attach before inflectional suffixes (as a derivational affix) or after them (as an\\n enclitic). One might see the process of affix reordering described in Haspelmath (1993) as\\n “externalization of inflection”, when a former clitic becomes a derivational affix. However, there is evidence that the uses of\\n kə̄n after inflection are innovative as compared to those before inflection, not vice versa, and this direction of\\n diachronic development is very unexpected. In this paper, I propose an explanation for this nonstandard reordering pattern and show that in\\n fact it has the same motivation and the same mechanisms as previously reported types of affix reordering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19070.sto\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19070.sto","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文讨论了乌尔查语(南通古斯语)中限定(限定)标记k / n ' only。这个标记具有重要的位置特征:它可以附加在屈折后缀之前(作为派生词缀)或之后(作为隐式词缀)。Haspelmath(1993)将词缀重新排序的过程描述为“词形变化的外化”(externalization of inflection),即原词缀变成派生词缀。然而,有证据表明,与拐点之前相比,拐点之后的k / n的使用是创新的,而不是相反,这种历时发展的方向是非常出乎意料的。在本文中,我对这种非标准重排模式提出了一种解释,并表明实际上它与之前报道的词缀重排类型具有相同的动机和机制。
This paper deals with the restrictive (limitative) marker kə̄n ‘only’ in Ulcha (Southern Tungusic). This
marker has nontrivial positional features: it can attach before inflectional suffixes (as a derivational affix) or after them (as an
enclitic). One might see the process of affix reordering described in Haspelmath (1993) as
“externalization of inflection”, when a former clitic becomes a derivational affix. However, there is evidence that the uses of
kə̄n after inflection are innovative as compared to those before inflection, not vice versa, and this direction of
diachronic development is very unexpected. In this paper, I propose an explanation for this nonstandard reordering pattern and show that in
fact it has the same motivation and the same mechanisms as previously reported types of affix reordering.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.