这个商业分析工具看起来不错,但是……没有它我依然快乐——来自金融服务业的证据

M. Leyer, J. Strohhecker, and Janina Kettenbohrer
{"title":"这个商业分析工具看起来不错,但是……没有它我依然快乐——来自金融服务业的证据","authors":"M. Leyer, J. Strohhecker, and Janina Kettenbohrer","doi":"10.15358/2511-8676-2021-1-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to take a behavioural perspective to reveal why employees hesitate to use business analytics in their operations throughout the whole organisation. We gather quantitative data with a survey in the financial services industry with 332 responses including both users of analytic tools as well as non-users. The results reveal that on an individual level it is skills being important for usage but not perceived value. On the organisational side, perceived norms from supervisors and peers as well as accessibility are important. Further analyses on the level of different business analytic tool categories show e.g. that the attitude of employees is important for forecasting but not for other tools. Practical implications are that supervisors should be convinced of the importance of analytic tools to foster usage among employees and selfservice options for having access to software supporting business analytics should be offered.","PeriodicalId":17054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice","volume":"76 1","pages":"20-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This Business Analytics Tool Looks Nice, but... I am Still Happy Without It - Evidence from the Financial Services Industry\",\"authors\":\"M. Leyer, J. Strohhecker, and Janina Kettenbohrer\",\"doi\":\"10.15358/2511-8676-2021-1-20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to take a behavioural perspective to reveal why employees hesitate to use business analytics in their operations throughout the whole organisation. We gather quantitative data with a survey in the financial services industry with 332 responses including both users of analytic tools as well as non-users. The results reveal that on an individual level it is skills being important for usage but not perceived value. On the organisational side, perceived norms from supervisors and peers as well as accessibility are important. Further analyses on the level of different business analytic tool categories show e.g. that the attitude of employees is important for forecasting but not for other tools. Practical implications are that supervisors should be convinced of the importance of analytic tools to foster usage among employees and selfservice options for having access to software supporting business analytics should be offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"20-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15358/2511-8676-2021-1-20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15358/2511-8676-2021-1-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是采取行为的角度来揭示为什么员工在整个组织的运营中犹豫使用业务分析。我们在金融服务行业进行了一项调查,收集了332个反馈,包括分析工具的用户和非用户的定量数据。结果显示,在个人层面上,技能对使用很重要,而不是感知价值。在组织方面,来自主管和同事的感知规范以及可访问性很重要。对不同业务分析工具类别的进一步分析表明,例如,员工的态度对预测很重要,但对其他工具不重要。实际的含义是,管理者应该确信分析工具对于促进员工使用的重要性,并且应该提供自助服务选项,以访问支持业务分析的软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
This Business Analytics Tool Looks Nice, but... I am Still Happy Without It - Evidence from the Financial Services Industry
The purpose of this paper is to take a behavioural perspective to reveal why employees hesitate to use business analytics in their operations throughout the whole organisation. We gather quantitative data with a survey in the financial services industry with 332 responses including both users of analytic tools as well as non-users. The results reveal that on an individual level it is skills being important for usage but not perceived value. On the organisational side, perceived norms from supervisors and peers as well as accessibility are important. Further analyses on the level of different business analytic tool categories show e.g. that the attitude of employees is important for forecasting but not for other tools. Practical implications are that supervisors should be convinced of the importance of analytic tools to foster usage among employees and selfservice options for having access to software supporting business analytics should be offered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 months
期刊最新文献
Principles of Strategy: A Practice-Based View No Risk - More Fun? The Influence of Shopping Companions on Adolescents' Risk Perception and Hedonism Antecedents of Frontline Employees' Customer Orientation: A Comprehensive Review Commentaries on the Sharing Economy: Advancing New Perspectives The Effects of Technology Affinity, Prior Customer Journey Experience, and Brand Familiarity on the Acceptance of Smart Service Innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1