电子书感知与使用:一项纵向随访研究

IF 0.8 4区管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Portal-Libraries and the Academy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1353/pla.2022.0036

T. Hackman, A. Carroll, Kelsey Corlett-Rivera, Kendra Macomber, Yishan Ding

{"title":"电子书感知与使用:一项纵向随访研究","authors":"T. Hackman, A. Carroll, Kelsey Corlett-Rivera, Kendra Macomber, Yishan Ding","doi":"10.1353/pla.2022.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article describes the results of a survey that gathered data on perceptions and use of e-books from undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and staff at two Maryland research universities in 2019. It follows two previous surveys in 2012 and 2014 by the same team of investigators, with slight changes in personnel, and compares results across time, by user affiliation with the university, and by STEM versus non-STEM disciplines. The study concludes with a discussion of the major findings and their implications for academic libraries and publishers, as well as areas for further inquiry.","PeriodicalId":51670,"journal":{"name":"Portal-Libraries and the Academy","volume":"3 1","pages":"681 - 723"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-Book Perceptions and Use: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study\",\"authors\":\"T. Hackman, A. Carroll, Kelsey Corlett-Rivera, Kendra Macomber, Yishan Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pla.2022.0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article describes the results of a survey that gathered data on perceptions and use of e-books from undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and staff at two Maryland research universities in 2019. It follows two previous surveys in 2012 and 2014 by the same team of investigators, with slight changes in personnel, and compares results across time, by user affiliation with the university, and by STEM versus non-STEM disciplines. The study concludes with a discussion of the major findings and their implications for academic libraries and publishers, as well as areas for further inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Portal-Libraries and the Academy\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"681 - 723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Portal-Libraries and the Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portal-Libraries and the Academy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述了一项调查的结果，该调查收集了2019年马里兰州两所研究型大学本科生、研究生、教职员工对电子书的看法和使用情况的数据。在此之前，同一调查团队在2012年和2014年进行了两次调查，人员略有变化，并根据用户与大学的隶属关系以及STEM与非STEM学科比较了不同时间的结果。该研究最后讨论了主要发现及其对学术图书馆和出版商的影响，以及进一步研究的领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

E-Book Perceptions and Use: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study

abstract:This article describes the results of a survey that gathered data on perceptions and use of e-books from undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and staff at two Maryland research universities in 2019. It follows two previous surveys in 2012 and 2014 by the same team of investigators, with slight changes in personnel, and compares results across time, by user affiliation with the university, and by STEM versus non-STEM disciplines. The study concludes with a discussion of the major findings and their implications for academic libraries and publishers, as well as areas for further inquiry.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Portal-Libraries and the Academy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

8.30%

发文量