隐私是保护言论自由的盾牌,还是打击言论自由的利剑?

Vishal Rakhecha
{"title":"隐私是保护言论自由的盾牌,还是打击言论自由的利剑?","authors":"Vishal Rakhecha","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The right of privacy after the judgement of the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy has been used as a means to restrict publication of private information of public officials by news media. This could lead to the stifling of free-speech rights of media. An appropriate balance would need to be struck between the normative values underlying these rights. On the one hand, protecting the dignity and autonomy of an individual, and on the other publishing information that is going to be in public interest.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy, the shield that protects or the sword that strikes freedom of speech?\",\"authors\":\"Vishal Rakhecha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The right of privacy after the judgement of the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy has been used as a means to restrict publication of private information of public officials by news media. This could lead to the stifling of free-speech rights of media. An appropriate balance would need to be struck between the normative values underlying these rights. On the one hand, protecting the dignity and autonomy of an individual, and on the other publishing information that is going to be in public interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最高法院“普塔斯瓦米案”判决后,隐私权被用作限制新闻媒体发布公职人员私人信息的手段。这可能会导致媒体言论自由权利的扼杀。需要在作为这些权利基础的规范价值之间取得适当的平衡。一方面,保护个人的尊严和自主权,另一方面,发布符合公共利益的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy, the shield that protects or the sword that strikes freedom of speech?
ABSTRACT The right of privacy after the judgement of the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy has been used as a means to restrict publication of private information of public officials by news media. This could lead to the stifling of free-speech rights of media. An appropriate balance would need to be struck between the normative values underlying these rights. On the one hand, protecting the dignity and autonomy of an individual, and on the other publishing information that is going to be in public interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1