不同市售品牌抗酸片中和能力评价

K. Abdu, M. Abbagana
{"title":"不同市售品牌抗酸片中和能力评价","authors":"K. Abdu, M. Abbagana","doi":"10.4314/CSJ.V6I2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is based on the evaluation of acid neutralizing capacity of five different commercial brands of antacid tablets. Five different but widely used commercial antacid tablets were selected for the purpose of this study. Each of the sample tablets was purchased, crushed, weighed and kept at room temperature before being analyzed using titrimetric method. Titration of each sample tablet (0.5 g) dissolved in 20 cm 3 of 0.1 M HCl with 0.1 M NaOH was carried out and the average titer values of different runs were recorded. The titre value for Gaviscon was 9.20 cm 3 , 13.04 cm 3 for Gestid, 10.02 cm 3 for Danacid, 10.10 cm 3 for Cimetidine and 10.05 cm 3  for Rennietidine. The neutralizing capacity (NC) of Gaviscon was found to be 82.6%, 53.4% for Gestid, 64.8% for Danacid, 49.8% for Cimetidine and 36.6% for Rennietidine. Analysis of the results shows that Gaviscon tablet has the highest NC, while Rennietidine shows lower NC value. Keywords : Antacid, Neutralizing capacity, Titrimetric, Tablets, Ulcer","PeriodicalId":9900,"journal":{"name":"ChemSearch Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Neutralizing Capacity of Different Commercial Brands of Antacid Tablets\",\"authors\":\"K. Abdu, M. Abbagana\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/CSJ.V6I2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is based on the evaluation of acid neutralizing capacity of five different commercial brands of antacid tablets. Five different but widely used commercial antacid tablets were selected for the purpose of this study. Each of the sample tablets was purchased, crushed, weighed and kept at room temperature before being analyzed using titrimetric method. Titration of each sample tablet (0.5 g) dissolved in 20 cm 3 of 0.1 M HCl with 0.1 M NaOH was carried out and the average titer values of different runs were recorded. The titre value for Gaviscon was 9.20 cm 3 , 13.04 cm 3 for Gestid, 10.02 cm 3 for Danacid, 10.10 cm 3 for Cimetidine and 10.05 cm 3  for Rennietidine. The neutralizing capacity (NC) of Gaviscon was found to be 82.6%, 53.4% for Gestid, 64.8% for Danacid, 49.8% for Cimetidine and 36.6% for Rennietidine. Analysis of the results shows that Gaviscon tablet has the highest NC, while Rennietidine shows lower NC value. Keywords : Antacid, Neutralizing capacity, Titrimetric, Tablets, Ulcer\",\"PeriodicalId\":9900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChemSearch Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChemSearch Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/CSJ.V6I2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemSearch Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/CSJ.V6I2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究是基于对五种不同品牌的抗酸片的酸中和能力的评价。本研究选择了五种不同但广泛使用的商业抗酸片。购买样品片,粉碎,称重,室温保存,然后用滴定法分析。将每片样品(0.5 g)溶于0.1 M HCl和0.1 M NaOH的20 cm 3溶液中进行滴定,记录不同批次的平均滴度值。Gaviscon滴度值为9.20 cm 3, Gestid为13.04 cm 3, Danacid为10.02 cm 3,西咪替丁为10.10 cm 3,雷尼替丁为10.05 cm 3。Gaviscon的中和能力(NC)为82.6%,Gestid为53.4%,Danacid为64.8%,西咪替丁为49.8%,雷尼替丁为36.6%。分析结果显示,加夫iscon片的NC值最高,而雷尼替丁的NC值较低。关键词:抗酸剂,中和能力,滴定法,片剂,溃疡
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Neutralizing Capacity of Different Commercial Brands of Antacid Tablets
This study is based on the evaluation of acid neutralizing capacity of five different commercial brands of antacid tablets. Five different but widely used commercial antacid tablets were selected for the purpose of this study. Each of the sample tablets was purchased, crushed, weighed and kept at room temperature before being analyzed using titrimetric method. Titration of each sample tablet (0.5 g) dissolved in 20 cm 3 of 0.1 M HCl with 0.1 M NaOH was carried out and the average titer values of different runs were recorded. The titre value for Gaviscon was 9.20 cm 3 , 13.04 cm 3 for Gestid, 10.02 cm 3 for Danacid, 10.10 cm 3 for Cimetidine and 10.05 cm 3  for Rennietidine. The neutralizing capacity (NC) of Gaviscon was found to be 82.6%, 53.4% for Gestid, 64.8% for Danacid, 49.8% for Cimetidine and 36.6% for Rennietidine. Analysis of the results shows that Gaviscon tablet has the highest NC, while Rennietidine shows lower NC value. Keywords : Antacid, Neutralizing capacity, Titrimetric, Tablets, Ulcer
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mangifera indica leaves powder for the removal of rhodamine B.: isotherm and kinetic studies Evaluation of heavy metals contamination in some irrigated vegetables from Kano, Nigeria Liquid-assisted Mechanochemical Conversion of 2-hydroxy-3- methoxybenzaldehyde and Some Primary Aromatic Amines to Corresponding Schiff bases Solid State Synthesis, Spectroscopic and X-ray Studies of Cu(II) Schiff base Complex Derived from 2-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde and 1,3- Phenylenediamine Trimethylamine N-oxide promoted decarbonylation reactions of molybdenum and tungsten hexacarbonyls with dimethylglyoxime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1