自回归状态空间方法与线性回归和人工神经网络在流量估计中的性能比较

IF 6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Informatics Pub Date : 2020-08-04 DOI:10.3808/jei.202000440
Y. Yang, T. Huang, Y. Shi, O. Wendroth, Bo Liu
{"title":"自回归状态空间方法与线性回归和人工神经网络在流量估计中的性能比较","authors":"Y. Yang, T. Huang, Y. Shi, O. Wendroth, Bo Liu","doi":"10.3808/jei.202000440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate streamflow estimation remains a great challenge although diverse modeling techniques have been developed during recent decades. In contrast to the process based models, the empirical data driven methods are easy to operate, require low computing capacity and yield fairly accurate outcomes, among which the state space (STATE) approach takes use of the temporal structures inherent in streamflow series and serves as a feasible solution for streamflow estimation. Yet this method has rarely been applied, neither its comparison with other methods. The objective was to compare the performance of an autoregressive STATE approach to the traditional multiple linear regression and artificial neural network in simulating annual streamflow series of 15 catchments located in the Loess Plateau of China. Annual data of streamflow (Q), precipitation (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) during 1961 ~ 2013 were collected. The results show that STATE was generally the most accurate method for Q estimation, explaining almost 90% of the total variance averaged over all the 15 catchments. The estimation of streamflow relied on its own of the previous year for most catchments. Besides, the impacts of P and PET on the temporal distribution of streamflow were almost equal. Missing data were estimated using the STATE method, which allowed inter annual trend analysis of the streamflow. Significant downward trends were manifested at all the 15 catchments during the study period and the corresponding slopes ranged from 0.24 to 1.71 mm/y. These findings hold important implications for hydrological modelling and management in China’s Loess Plateau and other arid and semi-arid regions","PeriodicalId":54840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Performance of an Autoregressive State-Space Approach to the Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network for Streamflow Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Y. Yang, T. Huang, Y. Shi, O. Wendroth, Bo Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3808/jei.202000440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate streamflow estimation remains a great challenge although diverse modeling techniques have been developed during recent decades. In contrast to the process based models, the empirical data driven methods are easy to operate, require low computing capacity and yield fairly accurate outcomes, among which the state space (STATE) approach takes use of the temporal structures inherent in streamflow series and serves as a feasible solution for streamflow estimation. Yet this method has rarely been applied, neither its comparison with other methods. The objective was to compare the performance of an autoregressive STATE approach to the traditional multiple linear regression and artificial neural network in simulating annual streamflow series of 15 catchments located in the Loess Plateau of China. Annual data of streamflow (Q), precipitation (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) during 1961 ~ 2013 were collected. The results show that STATE was generally the most accurate method for Q estimation, explaining almost 90% of the total variance averaged over all the 15 catchments. The estimation of streamflow relied on its own of the previous year for most catchments. Besides, the impacts of P and PET on the temporal distribution of streamflow were almost equal. Missing data were estimated using the STATE method, which allowed inter annual trend analysis of the streamflow. Significant downward trends were manifested at all the 15 catchments during the study period and the corresponding slopes ranged from 0.24 to 1.71 mm/y. These findings hold important implications for hydrological modelling and management in China’s Loess Plateau and other arid and semi-arid regions\",\"PeriodicalId\":54840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.202000440\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.202000440","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

尽管近几十年来发展了各种建模技术,但准确的流量估计仍然是一个巨大的挑战。与基于过程的模型相比,经验数据驱动方法具有操作简单、计算量小、结果准确等优点,其中状态空间(state)方法利用了流序列固有的时间结构,是一种可行的流估计方法。然而,这种方法很少被应用,也没有与其他方法进行比较。目的是比较自回归状态法与传统的多元线性回归和人工神经网络在模拟中国黄土高原15个流域年流量序列中的性能。收集了1961 ~ 2013年径流(Q)、降水(P)和潜在蒸散(PET)的年际资料。结果表明,STATE通常是最准确的Q估计方法,可以解释所有15个流域平均总方差的近90%。对大多数集水区的流量估算依赖于其前一年的数据。此外,P和PET对径流时间分布的影响几乎相等。使用STATE方法估计缺失数据,该方法允许对河流流量进行年际趋势分析。15个流域在研究期间均呈现明显的下降趋势,坡度范围为0.24 ~ 1.71 mm/y。这些发现对中国黄土高原及其他干旱半干旱地区的水文模拟和管理具有重要意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the Performance of an Autoregressive State-Space Approach to the Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network for Streamflow Estimation
Accurate streamflow estimation remains a great challenge although diverse modeling techniques have been developed during recent decades. In contrast to the process based models, the empirical data driven methods are easy to operate, require low computing capacity and yield fairly accurate outcomes, among which the state space (STATE) approach takes use of the temporal structures inherent in streamflow series and serves as a feasible solution for streamflow estimation. Yet this method has rarely been applied, neither its comparison with other methods. The objective was to compare the performance of an autoregressive STATE approach to the traditional multiple linear regression and artificial neural network in simulating annual streamflow series of 15 catchments located in the Loess Plateau of China. Annual data of streamflow (Q), precipitation (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) during 1961 ~ 2013 were collected. The results show that STATE was generally the most accurate method for Q estimation, explaining almost 90% of the total variance averaged over all the 15 catchments. The estimation of streamflow relied on its own of the previous year for most catchments. Besides, the impacts of P and PET on the temporal distribution of streamflow were almost equal. Missing data were estimated using the STATE method, which allowed inter annual trend analysis of the streamflow. Significant downward trends were manifested at all the 15 catchments during the study period and the corresponding slopes ranged from 0.24 to 1.71 mm/y. These findings hold important implications for hydrological modelling and management in China’s Loess Plateau and other arid and semi-arid regions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Informatics
Journal of Environmental Informatics ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Informatics (JEI) is an international, peer-reviewed, and interdisciplinary publication designed to foster research innovation and discovery on basic science and information technology for addressing various environmental problems. The journal aims to motivate and enhance the integration of science and technology to help develop sustainable solutions that are consensus-oriented, risk-informed, scientifically-based and cost-effective. JEI serves researchers, educators and practitioners who are interested in theoretical and/or applied aspects of environmental science, regardless of disciplinary boundaries. The topics addressed by the journal include: - Planning of energy, environmental and ecological management systems - Simulation, optimization and Environmental decision support - Environmental geomatics - GIS, RS and other spatial information technologies - Informatics for environmental chemistry and biochemistry - Environmental applications of functional materials - Environmental phenomena at atomic, molecular and macromolecular scales - Modeling of chemical, biological and environmental processes - Modeling of biotechnological systems for enhanced pollution mitigation - Computer graphics and visualization for environmental decision support - Artificial intelligence and expert systems for environmental applications - Environmental statistics and risk analysis - Climate modeling, downscaling, impact assessment, and adaptation planning - Other areas of environmental systems science and information technology.
期刊最新文献
Modelling Soil δ13C across the Tibetan Plateau Using Deep-Learning Impact of Carbon Emissions and Advance Payment on Optimal Decisions for Perishable Products via Parametric Approach of Interval Prediction of the Breeding and Wintering Ranges of Pomacea canaliculata in China Using Ensemble Models Decentralized Algae Removal Technologies for Lake Diefenbaker Irrigation Canals: A Review Real-Time LNG Buses Emissions Prediction Based on a Temporal Fusion Trans-Formers Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1