石棺内装木棺:古王国的普遍做法还是例外?

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Asian and African Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.31577/aassav.2023.32.1.02
Marie Peterková Hlouchová
{"title":"石棺内装木棺:古王国的普遍做法还是例外?","authors":"Marie Peterková Hlouchová","doi":"10.31577/aassav.2023.32.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Burial containers (including wooden coffins and stone sarcophagi) were one of the most important aspects of burials in ancient Egypt, but especially in the case of the Old Kingdom (ca. 2592 – 2120 BCE) they have not been properly researched. In particular, what remains unclear is the number of burial containers used in one burial. There are three possibilities regarding this particular issue. The first suggests that there was a wooden coffin inside each sarcophagus, the second claims that when there was a stone sarcophagus, no wooden coffin was needed, and the third envisages a variety of options. Archaeological evidence attests stone sarcophagi without wooden coffins as well as wooden coffins inside stone sarcophagi in addition to other possibilities. This brief case study draws on material from the residential, Memphite necropolis (mainly Abusir, but also from Saqqara and Giza) and demonstrates that there was considerable variation and that we do not properly understand the reasons behind the different choices in the terms of funerals and burials.","PeriodicalId":55909,"journal":{"name":"Asian and African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WOODEN COFFINS INSIDE STONE SARCOPHAGI: A COMMON PRACTICE OR AN EXCEPTION IN THE OLD KINGDOM?\",\"authors\":\"Marie Peterková Hlouchová\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/aassav.2023.32.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Burial containers (including wooden coffins and stone sarcophagi) were one of the most important aspects of burials in ancient Egypt, but especially in the case of the Old Kingdom (ca. 2592 – 2120 BCE) they have not been properly researched. In particular, what remains unclear is the number of burial containers used in one burial. There are three possibilities regarding this particular issue. The first suggests that there was a wooden coffin inside each sarcophagus, the second claims that when there was a stone sarcophagus, no wooden coffin was needed, and the third envisages a variety of options. Archaeological evidence attests stone sarcophagi without wooden coffins as well as wooden coffins inside stone sarcophagi in addition to other possibilities. This brief case study draws on material from the residential, Memphite necropolis (mainly Abusir, but also from Saqqara and Giza) and demonstrates that there was considerable variation and that we do not properly understand the reasons behind the different choices in the terms of funerals and burials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian and African Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian and African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/aassav.2023.32.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian and African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/aassav.2023.32.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埋葬容器(包括木棺材和石棺)是古埃及墓葬最重要的方面之一,但特别是在古王国(公元前2592年至公元前2120年)的情况下,它们没有得到适当的研究。特别是,目前尚不清楚一次埋葬中使用的埋葬容器的数量。关于这个问题有三种可能性。第一种说法认为,每个石棺里都有一个木棺材,第二种说法认为,如果有石棺,就不需要木棺材,第三种说法则设想了多种选择。考古证据证明石棺里没有木棺,石棺里也有木棺,还有其他的可能性。这个简短的案例研究利用了居住的曼菲特墓地(主要是阿布西尔,但也有来自萨卡拉和吉萨)的材料,并表明存在相当大的差异,我们并没有正确理解葬礼和埋葬方面不同选择背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WOODEN COFFINS INSIDE STONE SARCOPHAGI: A COMMON PRACTICE OR AN EXCEPTION IN THE OLD KINGDOM?
Burial containers (including wooden coffins and stone sarcophagi) were one of the most important aspects of burials in ancient Egypt, but especially in the case of the Old Kingdom (ca. 2592 – 2120 BCE) they have not been properly researched. In particular, what remains unclear is the number of burial containers used in one burial. There are three possibilities regarding this particular issue. The first suggests that there was a wooden coffin inside each sarcophagus, the second claims that when there was a stone sarcophagus, no wooden coffin was needed, and the third envisages a variety of options. Archaeological evidence attests stone sarcophagi without wooden coffins as well as wooden coffins inside stone sarcophagi in addition to other possibilities. This brief case study draws on material from the residential, Memphite necropolis (mainly Abusir, but also from Saqqara and Giza) and demonstrates that there was considerable variation and that we do not properly understand the reasons behind the different choices in the terms of funerals and burials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian and African Studies
Asian and African Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Vitajte na stránkach Ústavu orientalistiky SAV Ponúkame vám informácie o: - histórii a súčastnosti - interných pracovníkoch - štruktúre - grantoch a projektoch - časopise Asian and African Studies - knižnici - Slovenskej orientalistickej spoločnosti - združení PRO ORIENTE
期刊最新文献
LEE, Namhee. Memory Construction and the Politics of Time in Neoliberal South Korea AFRICAN HISTORY MATTERS: REPORT ON THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE THE SOURCES FOR AFRICAN HISTORY HELD AT THE TUNISIAN ACADEMY BEIT AL-HIKMA, 13 – 15 APRIL 2023 WHOSE TOOLS ARE THESE? AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPLIED TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF OLD KINGDOM EGYPTIAN CHISELS HISTOIRE DES RELATIONS ENTRE LE BURUNDI ET LE RWANDA: UNE TRAJECTOIRE EN DENTS DE SCIE A HISTORY OF RELATIONS BETWEEN BURUNDI AND RWANDA: ITS UPS AND DOWNS ČIŽMÍKOVÁ, Danuša. Hľadanie identít v modernej libanonskej ženskej próze [The Quest for Identities in Modern Lebanese Women’s Fiction]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1