用新工具解读旧文本:高中阅读作业的数字多模态作文

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH English Teaching-Practice and Critique Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1108/etpc-07-2020-0079
Jennifer Higgs, G. Kim
{"title":"用新工具解读旧文本:高中阅读作业的数字多模态作文","authors":"Jennifer Higgs, G. Kim","doi":"10.1108/etpc-07-2020-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nResearch on nonschool settings suggests young people benefit from digital multimodal composition. Less is known about how digital composing can support students as they interpret required literary class texts. To understand the potential benefits and challenges of digitally composing for literary analysis, design interviews with two high school students were conducted to examine their processes as they designed digital multimodal compositions to interpret Anglo-Saxon poems. Grounded in the social semiotic theory of multimodality, this study aims to examine how students engaged in literary analysis and interpretive digital composition within secondary ELA.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nQualitative classroom data were collected through digital means over a six-week period: a whole-class student survey, focal student semistructured design interviews, emails, field notes, analytic memos and student-created digital artifacts.\n\n\nFindings\nStudents’ print-based literary engagements and digital multimodal composition processes were mutually shaped. Additionally, digital multimodal composition offered entry points into challenging print-based literary texts, resulting in understandings enacted across multiple forms of mediation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study focused on one cycle of multimodal composition. Additional studies of students’ digital multimodal composition processes in ELA classrooms over time could be beneficial to the field.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study identifies an approach to digital multimodal composition that may help teachers address and integrate core disciplinary objectives.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to scholarship concerned with how “new” technologies and “old” literacies co-exist in contexts requiring students to engage in expanded communication modes alongside specific academic literacies.\n","PeriodicalId":45885,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting old texts with new tools: Digital multimodal composition for a high school reading assignment\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Higgs, G. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/etpc-07-2020-0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nResearch on nonschool settings suggests young people benefit from digital multimodal composition. Less is known about how digital composing can support students as they interpret required literary class texts. To understand the potential benefits and challenges of digitally composing for literary analysis, design interviews with two high school students were conducted to examine their processes as they designed digital multimodal compositions to interpret Anglo-Saxon poems. Grounded in the social semiotic theory of multimodality, this study aims to examine how students engaged in literary analysis and interpretive digital composition within secondary ELA.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nQualitative classroom data were collected through digital means over a six-week period: a whole-class student survey, focal student semistructured design interviews, emails, field notes, analytic memos and student-created digital artifacts.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nStudents’ print-based literary engagements and digital multimodal composition processes were mutually shaped. Additionally, digital multimodal composition offered entry points into challenging print-based literary texts, resulting in understandings enacted across multiple forms of mediation.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe study focused on one cycle of multimodal composition. Additional studies of students’ digital multimodal composition processes in ELA classrooms over time could be beneficial to the field.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe study identifies an approach to digital multimodal composition that may help teachers address and integrate core disciplinary objectives.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study contributes to scholarship concerned with how “new” technologies and “old” literacies co-exist in contexts requiring students to engage in expanded communication modes alongside specific academic literacies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Teaching-Practice and Critique\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Teaching-Practice and Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-07-2020-0079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-07-2020-0079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对非学校环境的研究表明,年轻人受益于数字多模式构图。对于数字写作如何帮助学生解释文学课上要求的文本,人们知之甚少。为了了解数字创作对文学分析的潜在好处和挑战,我们对两名高中生进行了设计访谈,以检查他们设计数字多模态作品来解释盎格鲁-撒克逊诗歌的过程。本研究以多模态的社会符号学理论为基础,旨在探讨中学生在中学语文教学中如何进行文学分析和解释性数字写作。设计/方法/方法定性的课堂数据是在六周的时间里通过数字手段收集的:全班学生调查、重点学生半结构化设计访谈、电子邮件、现场笔记、分析备忘录和学生创建的数字文物。学生的纸质文学活动和数字多模态写作过程是相互影响的。此外,数字多模态组合为具有挑战性的印刷文学文本提供了切入点,从而实现了跨多种形式调解的理解。研究局限/启示本研究集中于多模态作曲的一个周期。随着时间的推移,对ELA教室中学生数字多模态作文过程的进一步研究可能对该领域有益。实践意义本研究确定了一种数字化多模态作文的方法,可以帮助教师解决和整合核心学科目标。原创性/价值本研究有助于关注“新”技术和“旧”素养如何在要求学生与特定学术素养一起参与扩展交流模式的环境中共存的学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interpreting old texts with new tools: Digital multimodal composition for a high school reading assignment
Purpose Research on nonschool settings suggests young people benefit from digital multimodal composition. Less is known about how digital composing can support students as they interpret required literary class texts. To understand the potential benefits and challenges of digitally composing for literary analysis, design interviews with two high school students were conducted to examine their processes as they designed digital multimodal compositions to interpret Anglo-Saxon poems. Grounded in the social semiotic theory of multimodality, this study aims to examine how students engaged in literary analysis and interpretive digital composition within secondary ELA. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative classroom data were collected through digital means over a six-week period: a whole-class student survey, focal student semistructured design interviews, emails, field notes, analytic memos and student-created digital artifacts. Findings Students’ print-based literary engagements and digital multimodal composition processes were mutually shaped. Additionally, digital multimodal composition offered entry points into challenging print-based literary texts, resulting in understandings enacted across multiple forms of mediation. Research limitations/implications The study focused on one cycle of multimodal composition. Additional studies of students’ digital multimodal composition processes in ELA classrooms over time could be beneficial to the field. Practical implications The study identifies an approach to digital multimodal composition that may help teachers address and integrate core disciplinary objectives. Originality/value This study contributes to scholarship concerned with how “new” technologies and “old” literacies co-exist in contexts requiring students to engage in expanded communication modes alongside specific academic literacies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: English Teaching: Practice and Critique seeks to promote research and theory related to English literacy that is grounded in a range of contexts: classrooms, schools and wider educational constituencies. The journal has as its main focus English teaching in L1 settings. Submissions focused on EFL will be considered only if they have clear pertinence to English literacy in L1 settings. It provides a place where authors from a range of backgrounds can identify matters of common concern and thereby foster broad professional communities and networks. Where possible, English Teaching: Practice and Critique encourages comparative approaches to topics and issues. The journal published three types of manuscripts: research articles, essays (theoretical papers, reviews, and responses), and teacher narratives. Often special issues of the journal focus on distinct topics; however, unthemed manuscript submissions are always welcome and published in most issues.
期刊最新文献
Experiencing the cycles of love in teaching: the praxis of an early career Asian American ELA teacher Reading with love: the potential of critical posthuman reading practices in preservice English education Claiming a space in the W/writerly community to increase English Language Arts teacher agency “I’m really just scared of the White parents”: a teacher navigates perceptions of barriers to discussing racial injustice Playful literacies and pedagogical priorities: digital games in the English classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1