D. Sherifali, D. Fitzpatrick-Lewis, L. Peirson, D. Ciliska, D. Coyle
{"title":"成人2型糖尿病筛查:最新系统综述","authors":"D. Sherifali, D. Fitzpatrick-Lewis, L. Peirson, D. Ciliska, D. Coyle","doi":"10.2174/1876524601306010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This review was conducted to determine the clinical benefit and potential harms of screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in asymptomatic adults. Methods: The search strategy from the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force's framework on type 2 diabetes screening was updated. MEDLINE ® and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 2007 to 2012 for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and modeling studies. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE System and a standardized review process. Results: Previous results showing benefit of screening among those with high blood pressure were confirmed. No new or old trials were found regarding the effect of screening for T2DM on mortality, cardiovascular mortality and diabetes related complication outcomes. An observational study demonstrated a modest benefit in mortality in an initial cohort invited for T2DM screening (1990-1992), (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63, 1.00), but was not replicated in the second cohort invited for screening (2000-2003). Modeling studies reported that population based screening in high-risk individuals (age and hypertension as risk factors) might increase quality adjusted life years and was cost-effective if screening began at age 45 and every three to five years thereafter. Two new randomized controlled trials noted that screening was associated with higher levels of short-term anxiety and worry, but had limited overall psychological impact. Interpretation: This review found no controlled studies of the effectiveness of screening for T2DM, and one observational study demonstrating a modest benefit on mortality. Evidence for the harms associated with screening showed minimal clinical significance. Differences between current and previous evidence can be attributed to the current methodology that integrates the GRADE approach. Recommendations for screening reflect the best available evidence and include screening individuals at high risk for T2DM every 3-5 years with an A1C test, and individuals at very high risk annually with an A1C test.","PeriodicalId":22762,"journal":{"name":"The Open Diabetes Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"D. Sherifali, D. Fitzpatrick-Lewis, L. Peirson, D. Ciliska, D. Coyle\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876524601306010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This review was conducted to determine the clinical benefit and potential harms of screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in asymptomatic adults. Methods: The search strategy from the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force's framework on type 2 diabetes screening was updated. MEDLINE ® and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 2007 to 2012 for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and modeling studies. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE System and a standardized review process. Results: Previous results showing benefit of screening among those with high blood pressure were confirmed. No new or old trials were found regarding the effect of screening for T2DM on mortality, cardiovascular mortality and diabetes related complication outcomes. An observational study demonstrated a modest benefit in mortality in an initial cohort invited for T2DM screening (1990-1992), (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63, 1.00), but was not replicated in the second cohort invited for screening (2000-2003). Modeling studies reported that population based screening in high-risk individuals (age and hypertension as risk factors) might increase quality adjusted life years and was cost-effective if screening began at age 45 and every three to five years thereafter. Two new randomized controlled trials noted that screening was associated with higher levels of short-term anxiety and worry, but had limited overall psychological impact. Interpretation: This review found no controlled studies of the effectiveness of screening for T2DM, and one observational study demonstrating a modest benefit on mortality. Evidence for the harms associated with screening showed minimal clinical significance. Differences between current and previous evidence can be attributed to the current methodology that integrates the GRADE approach. Recommendations for screening reflect the best available evidence and include screening individuals at high risk for T2DM every 3-5 years with an A1C test, and individuals at very high risk annually with an A1C test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Diabetes Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Diabetes Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876524601306010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Diabetes Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876524601306010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
背景:本综述旨在确定无症状成人2型糖尿病(T2DM)筛查的临床获益和潜在危害。方法:更新了2008年美国预防服务工作组关于2型糖尿病筛查框架的搜索策略。检索MEDLINE®和Cochrane系统评价数据库2007 - 2012年的系统评价、随机对照试验和模型研究。使用GRADE系统和标准化的审查过程评估研究质量。结果:先前的研究结果证实了筛查对高血压患者的益处。没有新的或旧的试验发现筛查T2DM对死亡率、心血管死亡率和糖尿病相关并发症结局的影响。一项观察性研究表明,邀请进行2型糖尿病筛查的初始队列(1990-1992)在死亡率方面有一定的益处(HR 0.79;95% CI 0.63, 1.00),但在受邀进行筛查的第二队列(2000-2003)中没有得到重复。模型研究报告,在高危人群中进行基于人群的筛查(年龄和高血压为危险因素)可能会增加质量调整生命年,如果筛查从45岁开始,此后每3至5年进行一次,则具有成本效益。两项新的随机对照试验指出,筛查与更高水平的短期焦虑和担忧有关,但对整体心理影响有限。解释:本综述未发现T2DM筛查有效性的对照研究,一项观察性研究显示对死亡率有一定的益处。与筛查相关的危害证据显示临床意义很小。当前和以前的证据之间的差异可归因于当前整合了GRADE方法的方法。筛查建议反映了现有的最佳证据,包括对T2DM高危人群每3-5年进行一次糖化血红蛋白检测,对高危人群每年进行一次糖化血红蛋白检测。
Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review
Background: This review was conducted to determine the clinical benefit and potential harms of screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in asymptomatic adults. Methods: The search strategy from the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force's framework on type 2 diabetes screening was updated. MEDLINE ® and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 2007 to 2012 for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and modeling studies. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE System and a standardized review process. Results: Previous results showing benefit of screening among those with high blood pressure were confirmed. No new or old trials were found regarding the effect of screening for T2DM on mortality, cardiovascular mortality and diabetes related complication outcomes. An observational study demonstrated a modest benefit in mortality in an initial cohort invited for T2DM screening (1990-1992), (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63, 1.00), but was not replicated in the second cohort invited for screening (2000-2003). Modeling studies reported that population based screening in high-risk individuals (age and hypertension as risk factors) might increase quality adjusted life years and was cost-effective if screening began at age 45 and every three to five years thereafter. Two new randomized controlled trials noted that screening was associated with higher levels of short-term anxiety and worry, but had limited overall psychological impact. Interpretation: This review found no controlled studies of the effectiveness of screening for T2DM, and one observational study demonstrating a modest benefit on mortality. Evidence for the harms associated with screening showed minimal clinical significance. Differences between current and previous evidence can be attributed to the current methodology that integrates the GRADE approach. Recommendations for screening reflect the best available evidence and include screening individuals at high risk for T2DM every 3-5 years with an A1C test, and individuals at very high risk annually with an A1C test.