为社会主导的干预措施设计见解

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Design, Business and Society Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1386/DBS.5.1.7_1
R. Phillips
{"title":"为社会主导的干预措施设计见解","authors":"R. Phillips","doi":"10.1386/DBS.5.1.7_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design has become an accessible tool for organizations to create impactful outputs. These topics have diverged from mere retail to include: economic prospects, technological paradigms, social empowerment, sustainable resources, citizen-led opportunities and challenges that cross demographics, societies and cultures. Accessible technologies and the reduction of barriers to pilot funding have (in part) enabled the advancement of these socially-led responses through design. ‘Enablers’ take many forms including: digital manufacturing, accessible hardware, design platforms and smart technologies, all challenging what ‘designed products’ are as the ‘product’ is a social impact or intervention. The work mines embedded knowledge from successful award-winning organizations, which have not publically shared their unique insights. The work analyses an interview series of 60 plus CEOs, founders and co-founders of socially-led organizations with both design and non-design origins. The work identifies socially-led design ‘architectures’, highlighting issues, lessons and transferable insights. The study includes global organizations occupying territories of: not-for-profits, commercial practices, grass roots organizations, science practitioners, community-led ventures and intellectual property enterprises, selected from leading awards. The article identifies insights leading towards ‘socially-led product architecture’, and repeatable lessons, for non-design and design audiences.","PeriodicalId":36715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Design, Business and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design insights for socially-led interventions\",\"authors\":\"R. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/DBS.5.1.7_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design has become an accessible tool for organizations to create impactful outputs. These topics have diverged from mere retail to include: economic prospects, technological paradigms, social empowerment, sustainable resources, citizen-led opportunities and challenges that cross demographics, societies and cultures. Accessible technologies and the reduction of barriers to pilot funding have (in part) enabled the advancement of these socially-led responses through design. ‘Enablers’ take many forms including: digital manufacturing, accessible hardware, design platforms and smart technologies, all challenging what ‘designed products’ are as the ‘product’ is a social impact or intervention. The work mines embedded knowledge from successful award-winning organizations, which have not publically shared their unique insights. The work analyses an interview series of 60 plus CEOs, founders and co-founders of socially-led organizations with both design and non-design origins. The work identifies socially-led design ‘architectures’, highlighting issues, lessons and transferable insights. The study includes global organizations occupying territories of: not-for-profits, commercial practices, grass roots organizations, science practitioners, community-led ventures and intellectual property enterprises, selected from leading awards. The article identifies insights leading towards ‘socially-led product architecture’, and repeatable lessons, for non-design and design audiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Design, Business and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Design, Business and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/DBS.5.1.7_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Design, Business and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/DBS.5.1.7_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

设计已经成为组织创造有影响力的产出的一种可访问的工具。这些主题已从单纯的零售领域分化为:经济前景、技术范例、社会赋权、可持续资源、公民主导的跨越人口、社会和文化的机遇和挑战。无障碍技术和试点资金障碍的减少(在一定程度上)推动了这些由社会主导的设计反应。“推动者”有多种形式,包括:数字化制造、无障碍硬件、设计平台和智能技术,所有这些都挑战着“设计产品”的定义,因为“产品”是一种社会影响或干预。这项工作从成功的获奖组织中挖掘嵌入式知识,这些组织没有公开分享他们独特的见解。这项工作分析了对60多位首席执行官、创始人和联合创始人的一系列采访,他们都是设计和非设计出身的社会领导型组织。该作品确定了以社会为主导的设计“架构”,突出了问题、教训和可转移的见解。该研究包括从主要奖项中选出的全球组织:非营利组织、商业实践、基层组织、科学从业者、社区领导的企业和知识产权企业。本文为非设计人员和设计人员提供了“以社会为导向的产品架构”的见解和可重复的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design insights for socially-led interventions
Design has become an accessible tool for organizations to create impactful outputs. These topics have diverged from mere retail to include: economic prospects, technological paradigms, social empowerment, sustainable resources, citizen-led opportunities and challenges that cross demographics, societies and cultures. Accessible technologies and the reduction of barriers to pilot funding have (in part) enabled the advancement of these socially-led responses through design. ‘Enablers’ take many forms including: digital manufacturing, accessible hardware, design platforms and smart technologies, all challenging what ‘designed products’ are as the ‘product’ is a social impact or intervention. The work mines embedded knowledge from successful award-winning organizations, which have not publically shared their unique insights. The work analyses an interview series of 60 plus CEOs, founders and co-founders of socially-led organizations with both design and non-design origins. The work identifies socially-led design ‘architectures’, highlighting issues, lessons and transferable insights. The study includes global organizations occupying territories of: not-for-profits, commercial practices, grass roots organizations, science practitioners, community-led ventures and intellectual property enterprises, selected from leading awards. The article identifies insights leading towards ‘socially-led product architecture’, and repeatable lessons, for non-design and design audiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Design, Business and Society
Journal of Design, Business and Society Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Re-designing public–private partnerships: Case study – Green Hydrogen Hub, Denmark A bibliometric study of organizational storytelling/narrative research Making a difference: Design-driven intrapreneurship at the UN Refugee Agency Interview with Catherine Weetman, founder of Rethink Global and author of A Circular Economy Handbook: How to Build a More Resilient, Competitive and Sustainable Business A century of corporate design: A conversation with Jerry Kathman, founder and chairman of the board, LPK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1