超矩阵方法为龙胆属提供了一个全面的属级系统发育

Leilei Yang, Hong‐Lei Li, Lei Wei, Tuo Yang, Dai-Yong Kuang, Minghong Li, Yi-Ying Liao, Zhiduan Chen, Hong Wu, Shouzhou Zhang
{"title":"超矩阵方法为龙胆属提供了一个全面的属级系统发育","authors":"Leilei Yang, Hong‐Lei Li, Lei Wei, Tuo Yang, Dai-Yong Kuang, Minghong Li, Yi-Ying Liao, Zhiduan Chen, Hong Wu, Shouzhou Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jse.12192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gentianales consist of Apocynaceae, Gelsemiaceae, Gentianaceae, Loganiaceae, and Rubiaceae, of which the majority are woody plants in tropical and subtropical areas. Despite extensive efforts in reconstructing the phylogeny of Gentianales based on molecular data, some interfamily and intrafamily relationships remain uncertain. We reconstructed the genus‐level phylogeny of Gentianales based on the supermatrix of eight plastid markers (rbcL, matK, atpB, ndhF, rpl16, rps16, the trnL‐trnF region, and atpB‐rbcL spacer) and one mitochondrial gene (matR) using maximum likelihood. The major clades and their relationships retrieved in the present study concur with those of previous studies. All of the five families of Gentianales are monophyletic with strong support. We resolved Rubiaceae as sister to the remaining families in Gentianales and showed support for the sister relationship between Loganiaceae and Apocynaceae. Our results provide new insights into relationships among intrafamilial clades. For example, within Rubiaceae we found that Craterispermeae were sister to Morindeae + (Palicoureeae + Psychotrieae) and that Theligoneae were sister to Putorieae. Within Gentianaceae, our phylogeny revealed that Gentianeae were sister to Helieae and Potalieae, and subtribe Lisianthiinae were sister to Potaliinae and Faroinae. Within Loganiaceae, we found Neuburgia as sister to Spigelieae. Within Apocynaceae, our results supported Amsonieae as sister to Melodineae, and Hunterieae as sister to a clade comprising Plumerieae + (Carisseae + APSA). We also confirmed the monophyly of Perplocoideae and the relationships among Baisseeae + (Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae).","PeriodicalId":101317,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A supermatrix approach provides a comprehensive genus‐level phylogeny for Gentianales\",\"authors\":\"Leilei Yang, Hong‐Lei Li, Lei Wei, Tuo Yang, Dai-Yong Kuang, Minghong Li, Yi-Ying Liao, Zhiduan Chen, Hong Wu, Shouzhou Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jse.12192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gentianales consist of Apocynaceae, Gelsemiaceae, Gentianaceae, Loganiaceae, and Rubiaceae, of which the majority are woody plants in tropical and subtropical areas. Despite extensive efforts in reconstructing the phylogeny of Gentianales based on molecular data, some interfamily and intrafamily relationships remain uncertain. We reconstructed the genus‐level phylogeny of Gentianales based on the supermatrix of eight plastid markers (rbcL, matK, atpB, ndhF, rpl16, rps16, the trnL‐trnF region, and atpB‐rbcL spacer) and one mitochondrial gene (matR) using maximum likelihood. The major clades and their relationships retrieved in the present study concur with those of previous studies. All of the five families of Gentianales are monophyletic with strong support. We resolved Rubiaceae as sister to the remaining families in Gentianales and showed support for the sister relationship between Loganiaceae and Apocynaceae. Our results provide new insights into relationships among intrafamilial clades. For example, within Rubiaceae we found that Craterispermeae were sister to Morindeae + (Palicoureeae + Psychotrieae) and that Theligoneae were sister to Putorieae. Within Gentianaceae, our phylogeny revealed that Gentianeae were sister to Helieae and Potalieae, and subtribe Lisianthiinae were sister to Potaliinae and Faroinae. Within Loganiaceae, we found Neuburgia as sister to Spigelieae. Within Apocynaceae, our results supported Amsonieae as sister to Melodineae, and Hunterieae as sister to a clade comprising Plumerieae + (Carisseae + APSA). We also confirmed the monophyly of Perplocoideae and the relationships among Baisseeae + (Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae).\",\"PeriodicalId\":101317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

龙胆属植物包括夹竹桃科、龙胆科、龙胆科、龙胆科和龙胆科,主要为热带和亚热带地区的木本植物。尽管基于分子数据重建龙胆属植物的系统发育做了大量的工作,但一些家族间和家族内的关系仍然不确定。基于8个质体标记(rbcL、matK、atpB、ndhF、rpl16、rps16、trnL‐trnF区、atpB‐rbcL间隔区)和1个线粒体基因(matR)的超矩阵,利用极大似然法重构了龙胆属植物的属级系统发育。本研究检索到的主要支系及其关系与以往的研究结果一致。龙胆属5个科均为单系,具有较强的支撑力。结果表明,龙胆科与夹竹桃科是姊妹科,龙胆科与夹竹桃科是姊妹科。我们的研究结果为家族内进化枝之间的关系提供了新的见解。例如,在Rubiaceae中,我们发现Craterispermeae是Morindeae + (palicoureae + psychotriieae)的姐妹,theeligoneae是Putorieae的姐妹。在龙胆科中,龙胆科是Helieae和Potalieae的姊妹科,liisianthiinae亚族是potaliineae和Faroinae的姊妹科。在loganaceae中,我们发现newburgia是Spigelieae的姊妹科。在夹竹桃科中,Amsonieae是Melodineae的姐妹科,Hunterieae是由Plumerieae + (Carisseae + APSA)组成的分支的姐妹科。证实了蠓科的单系性,以及百视科+(蠓科+ Asclepiadoideae)的亲缘关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A supermatrix approach provides a comprehensive genus‐level phylogeny for Gentianales
Gentianales consist of Apocynaceae, Gelsemiaceae, Gentianaceae, Loganiaceae, and Rubiaceae, of which the majority are woody plants in tropical and subtropical areas. Despite extensive efforts in reconstructing the phylogeny of Gentianales based on molecular data, some interfamily and intrafamily relationships remain uncertain. We reconstructed the genus‐level phylogeny of Gentianales based on the supermatrix of eight plastid markers (rbcL, matK, atpB, ndhF, rpl16, rps16, the trnL‐trnF region, and atpB‐rbcL spacer) and one mitochondrial gene (matR) using maximum likelihood. The major clades and their relationships retrieved in the present study concur with those of previous studies. All of the five families of Gentianales are monophyletic with strong support. We resolved Rubiaceae as sister to the remaining families in Gentianales and showed support for the sister relationship between Loganiaceae and Apocynaceae. Our results provide new insights into relationships among intrafamilial clades. For example, within Rubiaceae we found that Craterispermeae were sister to Morindeae + (Palicoureeae + Psychotrieae) and that Theligoneae were sister to Putorieae. Within Gentianaceae, our phylogeny revealed that Gentianeae were sister to Helieae and Potalieae, and subtribe Lisianthiinae were sister to Potaliinae and Faroinae. Within Loganiaceae, we found Neuburgia as sister to Spigelieae. Within Apocynaceae, our results supported Amsonieae as sister to Melodineae, and Hunterieae as sister to a clade comprising Plumerieae + (Carisseae + APSA). We also confirmed the monophyly of Perplocoideae and the relationships among Baisseeae + (Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Slowing taxon cycle can explain biodiversity patterns on islands: Insights into the biogeography of the tropical South Pacific from molecular data Almost half of the Gymnura van Hasselt, 1823 species are unknown: Phylogeographic inference as scissors for cutting the hidden Gordian knot and clarify their conservation status The genetic diversity in the ancient human population of Upper Xiajiadian culture A test of island plant syndromes using resource‐use traits First buckthorn (Rhamnaceae) fossil flowers from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1