基于事件相关电位的目标计数任务数量处理

Chenming Sun, Liyan Cui, Yifeng Yan, Yaru Shang, Zhuoming Chen
{"title":"基于事件相关电位的目标计数任务数量处理","authors":"Chenming Sun, Liyan Cui, Yifeng Yan, Yaru Shang, Zhuoming Chen","doi":"10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In the preliminary event-dependent potentials study, our team found that the neural mechanism of Chinese singular and plural picture naming is different, and explained that the differences might lie in the different numbers of quantitative processing. However, previous studies have lacked separate neural processing of objects in singular-plural pictures. This study intends to explore the neural differences in quantity processing in singular and plural pictures by using an object counting task and combining Event-related potential (ERP). It is expected to prove that the neural differences of naming Chinese single and plural pictures found in our previous ERP research are neural processing differences of different quantities, further demonstrating that the quantity processing in Chinese singular and plural picture naming is automatic. The experimental results showed no significant differences in object counting accuracy (P=0.139) and reaction time (P=0.231) between the singular and plural groups. However, there was a noticeable difference in ERPs between the two groups (P<0.05) and statistical analysis showed that the P1 effect of the parieto-occipital lobe was greater in plural pictures than in singular pictures (140-180ms) and the P2 effect of the parieto-occipital lobe was more significant in singular pictures than in plural pictures (200-320ms). There are differences in the quantity processing of healthy adults in object counting tasks. These differences are similar to the neural differences in Chinese singular-plural picture naming, indicating that the quantity is automatically processed in this process.","PeriodicalId":93199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantity Processing in Object Counting Task Based on Event-Related Potentials\",\"authors\":\"Chenming Sun, Liyan Cui, Yifeng Yan, Yaru Shang, Zhuoming Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In the preliminary event-dependent potentials study, our team found that the neural mechanism of Chinese singular and plural picture naming is different, and explained that the differences might lie in the different numbers of quantitative processing. However, previous studies have lacked separate neural processing of objects in singular-plural pictures. This study intends to explore the neural differences in quantity processing in singular and plural pictures by using an object counting task and combining Event-related potential (ERP). It is expected to prove that the neural differences of naming Chinese single and plural pictures found in our previous ERP research are neural processing differences of different quantities, further demonstrating that the quantity processing in Chinese singular and plural picture naming is automatic. The experimental results showed no significant differences in object counting accuracy (P=0.139) and reaction time (P=0.231) between the singular and plural groups. However, there was a noticeable difference in ERPs between the two groups (P<0.05) and statistical analysis showed that the P1 effect of the parieto-occipital lobe was greater in plural pictures than in singular pictures (140-180ms) and the P2 effect of the parieto-occipital lobe was more significant in singular pictures than in plural pictures (200-320ms). There are differences in the quantity processing of healthy adults in object counting tasks. These differences are similar to the neural differences in Chinese singular-plural picture naming, indicating that the quantity is automatically processed in this process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在初步的事件依赖电位研究中,我们发现汉语单复数图像命名的神经机制存在差异,并解释了这种差异可能与定量处理次数的不同有关。然而,先前的研究缺乏对单复数图像中物体的单独神经处理。本研究采用对象计数任务,结合事件相关电位(event - associated potential, ERP),探讨单复数图像数量加工的神经差异。我们期望能证明我们在以往的ERP研究中发现的汉语单复数图片命名的神经差异是不同数量的神经加工差异,从而进一步证明汉语单复数图片命名的数量加工是自动的。实验结果显示,单、复数组在物体计数准确率(P=0.139)和反应时间(P=0.231)上无显著差异。但两组ERPs比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),统计分析显示,单幅图像的顶枕叶P1效应大于单幅图像(140 ~ 180ms),单幅图像的顶枕叶P2效应大于单幅图像(200 ~ 320ms)。在物体计数任务中,健康成人的数量加工存在差异。这些差异与汉语单复数图片命名的神经差异相似,说明在此过程中数量是自动处理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantity Processing in Object Counting Task Based on Event-Related Potentials
: In the preliminary event-dependent potentials study, our team found that the neural mechanism of Chinese singular and plural picture naming is different, and explained that the differences might lie in the different numbers of quantitative processing. However, previous studies have lacked separate neural processing of objects in singular-plural pictures. This study intends to explore the neural differences in quantity processing in singular and plural pictures by using an object counting task and combining Event-related potential (ERP). It is expected to prove that the neural differences of naming Chinese single and plural pictures found in our previous ERP research are neural processing differences of different quantities, further demonstrating that the quantity processing in Chinese singular and plural picture naming is automatic. The experimental results showed no significant differences in object counting accuracy (P=0.139) and reaction time (P=0.231) between the singular and plural groups. However, there was a noticeable difference in ERPs between the two groups (P<0.05) and statistical analysis showed that the P1 effect of the parieto-occipital lobe was greater in plural pictures than in singular pictures (140-180ms) and the P2 effect of the parieto-occipital lobe was more significant in singular pictures than in plural pictures (200-320ms). There are differences in the quantity processing of healthy adults in object counting tasks. These differences are similar to the neural differences in Chinese singular-plural picture naming, indicating that the quantity is automatically processed in this process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of Stroke at University Teaching Hospital of Kara (Togo) in 2022 Advances in Space Navigation Reference System Research Neurocysticercosis at UTH of Kara: Epidemiological, Clinical, Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Evolutive Aspects Role of BDNF-TrkB Signaling in Regulating Anxiety and Depression-Like Behavior in Diverse Brain Regions Non Vitamin k Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation Assessment in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1