R. Ramchandani, Simon Berry, Jane Berry, Beth A. Pratt, Albert Saka, R. Black
{"title":"改进口服补液盐合理使用的设计思维:来自一种创新的共包装腹泻治疗包的经验教训","authors":"R. Ramchandani, Simon Berry, Jane Berry, Beth A. Pratt, Albert Saka, R. Black","doi":"10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction We explored whether greater consideration of product design, informed by end users’ opinions, led to improved utilisation (ie, rational use) of oral rehydration salts (ORS) in home settings. We tested whether a ‘design thinking’ approach, focusing on product acceptability, functionality and ease of use, contributed to an increased likelihood of appropriate ORS use, specifically dosing and preparation of ORS in the correct concentration. Methods Intervention design decisions were used to develop a co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit containing ORS and zinc, branded as ‘Kit Yamoyo’. In addition to co-packaging, key product design features were the inclusion of 200 mL ORS sachets and a water measurement function incorporated in the packaging design. Cross-sectional data from household surveys of caregivers in rural Zambia were then used to compare ORS preparation and use for diarrhoea patients aged <5 years, who used either the novel co-pack or standard 1 L sachets of ORS. Design benefits were demonstrated to caregivers from two rural areas by trained community health workers (CHWs). Results Odds of correct ORS preparation were 10.93 times greater (p<0.001; 95% CI 5.74 to 20.78) among Kit Yamoyo users versus individuals who used 1 L sachets. Co-pack users prepared ORS to the correct concentration 93% (95% CI 0.89% to 0.96%) of the time, while non-users prepared it in the correct concentration just 60% (95% CI 0.54% to 0.66%) of the time. Conclusion Application of design thinking to the development of a co-packaged ORS and zinc diarrhoea treatment kit, coupled with demonstrations by CHWs, can improve rational use of ORS.","PeriodicalId":53454,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Innovations","volume":"112 1","pages":"132 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design thinking to improve rational use of oral rehydration salts: lessons from an innovative co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit\",\"authors\":\"R. Ramchandani, Simon Berry, Jane Berry, Beth A. Pratt, Albert Saka, R. Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction We explored whether greater consideration of product design, informed by end users’ opinions, led to improved utilisation (ie, rational use) of oral rehydration salts (ORS) in home settings. We tested whether a ‘design thinking’ approach, focusing on product acceptability, functionality and ease of use, contributed to an increased likelihood of appropriate ORS use, specifically dosing and preparation of ORS in the correct concentration. Methods Intervention design decisions were used to develop a co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit containing ORS and zinc, branded as ‘Kit Yamoyo’. In addition to co-packaging, key product design features were the inclusion of 200 mL ORS sachets and a water measurement function incorporated in the packaging design. Cross-sectional data from household surveys of caregivers in rural Zambia were then used to compare ORS preparation and use for diarrhoea patients aged <5 years, who used either the novel co-pack or standard 1 L sachets of ORS. Design benefits were demonstrated to caregivers from two rural areas by trained community health workers (CHWs). Results Odds of correct ORS preparation were 10.93 times greater (p<0.001; 95% CI 5.74 to 20.78) among Kit Yamoyo users versus individuals who used 1 L sachets. Co-pack users prepared ORS to the correct concentration 93% (95% CI 0.89% to 0.96%) of the time, while non-users prepared it in the correct concentration just 60% (95% CI 0.54% to 0.66%) of the time. Conclusion Application of design thinking to the development of a co-packaged ORS and zinc diarrhoea treatment kit, coupled with demonstrations by CHWs, can improve rational use of ORS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"132 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们探讨了更多地考虑产品设计,并根据最终用户的意见,是否会提高口服补液盐(ORS)在家庭环境中的利用率(即合理使用)。我们测试了关注产品可接受性、功能性和易用性的“设计思维”方法是否有助于增加适当使用口服补液的可能性,特别是正确浓度的口服补液的剂量和制备。方法采用干预设计决策开发含有ORS和锌的共包装腹泻治疗包,品牌为“kit Yamoyo”。除了共同包装,关键的产品设计特点是包括200毫升ORS小袋和水测量功能纳入包装设计。然后使用来自赞比亚农村护理人员家庭调查的横断面数据来比较5岁以下腹泻患者口服补液的制备和使用,这些患者使用新型联合包装或标准1l小袋口服补液。由训练有素的社区卫生工作者(CHWs)向两个农村地区的护理人员展示了设计的好处。结果ORS制备正确的几率为10.93倍(p<0.001;Kit Yamoyo使用者与使用1l小袋的个体之间的95%可信区间为5.74至20.78)。共包装使用者在93%的时间(95% CI 0.89%至0.96%)将ORS配制成正确的浓度,而非使用者仅在60%的时间(95% CI 0.54%至0.66%)将ORS配制成正确的浓度。结论将设计思维应用于口服补液和锌腹泻共包装治疗包的开发,并辅以卫生工作者的示范,可提高口服补液的合理使用。
Design thinking to improve rational use of oral rehydration salts: lessons from an innovative co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit
Introduction We explored whether greater consideration of product design, informed by end users’ opinions, led to improved utilisation (ie, rational use) of oral rehydration salts (ORS) in home settings. We tested whether a ‘design thinking’ approach, focusing on product acceptability, functionality and ease of use, contributed to an increased likelihood of appropriate ORS use, specifically dosing and preparation of ORS in the correct concentration. Methods Intervention design decisions were used to develop a co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit containing ORS and zinc, branded as ‘Kit Yamoyo’. In addition to co-packaging, key product design features were the inclusion of 200 mL ORS sachets and a water measurement function incorporated in the packaging design. Cross-sectional data from household surveys of caregivers in rural Zambia were then used to compare ORS preparation and use for diarrhoea patients aged <5 years, who used either the novel co-pack or standard 1 L sachets of ORS. Design benefits were demonstrated to caregivers from two rural areas by trained community health workers (CHWs). Results Odds of correct ORS preparation were 10.93 times greater (p<0.001; 95% CI 5.74 to 20.78) among Kit Yamoyo users versus individuals who used 1 L sachets. Co-pack users prepared ORS to the correct concentration 93% (95% CI 0.89% to 0.96%) of the time, while non-users prepared it in the correct concentration just 60% (95% CI 0.54% to 0.66%) of the time. Conclusion Application of design thinking to the development of a co-packaged ORS and zinc diarrhoea treatment kit, coupled with demonstrations by CHWs, can improve rational use of ORS.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare is undergoing a revolution and novel medical technologies are being developed to treat patients in better and faster ways. Mobile revolution has put a handheld computer in pockets of billions and we are ushering in an era of mHealth. In developed and developing world alike healthcare costs are a concern and frugal innovations are being promoted for bringing down the costs of healthcare. BMJ Innovations aims to promote innovative research which creates new, cost-effective medical devices, technologies, processes and systems that improve patient care, with particular focus on the needs of patients, physicians, and the health care industry as a whole and act as a platform to catalyse and seed more innovations. Submissions to BMJ Innovations will be considered from all clinical areas of medicine along with business and process innovations that make healthcare accessible and affordable. Submissions from groups of investigators engaged in international collaborations are especially encouraged. The broad areas of innovations that this journal aims to chronicle include but are not limited to: Medical devices, mHealth and wearable health technologies, Assistive technologies, Diagnostics, Health IT, systems and process innovation.