改进口服补液盐合理使用的设计思维:来自一种创新的共包装腹泻治疗包的经验教训

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Innovations Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081
R. Ramchandani, Simon Berry, Jane Berry, Beth A. Pratt, Albert Saka, R. Black
{"title":"改进口服补液盐合理使用的设计思维:来自一种创新的共包装腹泻治疗包的经验教训","authors":"R. Ramchandani, Simon Berry, Jane Berry, Beth A. Pratt, Albert Saka, R. Black","doi":"10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction We explored whether greater consideration of product design, informed by end users’ opinions, led to improved utilisation (ie, rational use) of oral rehydration salts (ORS) in home settings. We tested whether a ‘design thinking’ approach, focusing on product acceptability, functionality and ease of use, contributed to an increased likelihood of appropriate ORS use, specifically dosing and preparation of ORS in the correct concentration. Methods Intervention design decisions were used to develop a co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit containing ORS and zinc, branded as ‘Kit Yamoyo’. In addition to co-packaging, key product design features were the inclusion of 200 mL ORS sachets and a water measurement function incorporated in the packaging design. Cross-sectional data from household surveys of caregivers in rural Zambia were then used to compare ORS preparation and use for diarrhoea patients aged <5 years, who used either the novel co-pack or standard 1 L sachets of ORS. Design benefits were demonstrated to caregivers from two rural areas by trained community health workers (CHWs). Results Odds of correct ORS preparation were 10.93 times greater (p<0.001; 95% CI 5.74 to 20.78) among Kit Yamoyo users versus individuals who used 1 L sachets. Co-pack users prepared ORS to the correct concentration 93% (95% CI 0.89% to 0.96%) of the time, while non-users prepared it in the correct concentration just 60% (95% CI 0.54% to 0.66%) of the time. Conclusion Application of design thinking to the development of a co-packaged ORS and zinc diarrhoea treatment kit, coupled with demonstrations by CHWs, can improve rational use of ORS.","PeriodicalId":53454,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Innovations","volume":"112 1","pages":"132 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design thinking to improve rational use of oral rehydration salts: lessons from an innovative co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit\",\"authors\":\"R. Ramchandani, Simon Berry, Jane Berry, Beth A. Pratt, Albert Saka, R. Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction We explored whether greater consideration of product design, informed by end users’ opinions, led to improved utilisation (ie, rational use) of oral rehydration salts (ORS) in home settings. We tested whether a ‘design thinking’ approach, focusing on product acceptability, functionality and ease of use, contributed to an increased likelihood of appropriate ORS use, specifically dosing and preparation of ORS in the correct concentration. Methods Intervention design decisions were used to develop a co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit containing ORS and zinc, branded as ‘Kit Yamoyo’. In addition to co-packaging, key product design features were the inclusion of 200 mL ORS sachets and a water measurement function incorporated in the packaging design. Cross-sectional data from household surveys of caregivers in rural Zambia were then used to compare ORS preparation and use for diarrhoea patients aged <5 years, who used either the novel co-pack or standard 1 L sachets of ORS. Design benefits were demonstrated to caregivers from two rural areas by trained community health workers (CHWs). Results Odds of correct ORS preparation were 10.93 times greater (p<0.001; 95% CI 5.74 to 20.78) among Kit Yamoyo users versus individuals who used 1 L sachets. Co-pack users prepared ORS to the correct concentration 93% (95% CI 0.89% to 0.96%) of the time, while non-users prepared it in the correct concentration just 60% (95% CI 0.54% to 0.66%) of the time. Conclusion Application of design thinking to the development of a co-packaged ORS and zinc diarrhoea treatment kit, coupled with demonstrations by CHWs, can improve rational use of ORS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"132 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们探讨了更多地考虑产品设计,并根据最终用户的意见,是否会提高口服补液盐(ORS)在家庭环境中的利用率(即合理使用)。我们测试了关注产品可接受性、功能性和易用性的“设计思维”方法是否有助于增加适当使用口服补液的可能性,特别是正确浓度的口服补液的剂量和制备。方法采用干预设计决策开发含有ORS和锌的共包装腹泻治疗包,品牌为“kit Yamoyo”。除了共同包装,关键的产品设计特点是包括200毫升ORS小袋和水测量功能纳入包装设计。然后使用来自赞比亚农村护理人员家庭调查的横断面数据来比较5岁以下腹泻患者口服补液的制备和使用,这些患者使用新型联合包装或标准1l小袋口服补液。由训练有素的社区卫生工作者(CHWs)向两个农村地区的护理人员展示了设计的好处。结果ORS制备正确的几率为10.93倍(p<0.001;Kit Yamoyo使用者与使用1l小袋的个体之间的95%可信区间为5.74至20.78)。共包装使用者在93%的时间(95% CI 0.89%至0.96%)将ORS配制成正确的浓度,而非使用者仅在60%的时间(95% CI 0.54%至0.66%)将ORS配制成正确的浓度。结论将设计思维应用于口服补液和锌腹泻共包装治疗包的开发,并辅以卫生工作者的示范,可提高口服补液的合理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design thinking to improve rational use of oral rehydration salts: lessons from an innovative co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit
Introduction We explored whether greater consideration of product design, informed by end users’ opinions, led to improved utilisation (ie, rational use) of oral rehydration salts (ORS) in home settings. We tested whether a ‘design thinking’ approach, focusing on product acceptability, functionality and ease of use, contributed to an increased likelihood of appropriate ORS use, specifically dosing and preparation of ORS in the correct concentration. Methods Intervention design decisions were used to develop a co-packaged diarrhoea treatment kit containing ORS and zinc, branded as ‘Kit Yamoyo’. In addition to co-packaging, key product design features were the inclusion of 200 mL ORS sachets and a water measurement function incorporated in the packaging design. Cross-sectional data from household surveys of caregivers in rural Zambia were then used to compare ORS preparation and use for diarrhoea patients aged <5 years, who used either the novel co-pack or standard 1 L sachets of ORS. Design benefits were demonstrated to caregivers from two rural areas by trained community health workers (CHWs). Results Odds of correct ORS preparation were 10.93 times greater (p<0.001; 95% CI 5.74 to 20.78) among Kit Yamoyo users versus individuals who used 1 L sachets. Co-pack users prepared ORS to the correct concentration 93% (95% CI 0.89% to 0.96%) of the time, while non-users prepared it in the correct concentration just 60% (95% CI 0.54% to 0.66%) of the time. Conclusion Application of design thinking to the development of a co-packaged ORS and zinc diarrhoea treatment kit, coupled with demonstrations by CHWs, can improve rational use of ORS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Innovations
BMJ Innovations Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Healthcare is undergoing a revolution and novel medical technologies are being developed to treat patients in better and faster ways. Mobile revolution has put a handheld computer in pockets of billions and we are ushering in an era of mHealth. In developed and developing world alike healthcare costs are a concern and frugal innovations are being promoted for bringing down the costs of healthcare. BMJ Innovations aims to promote innovative research which creates new, cost-effective medical devices, technologies, processes and systems that improve patient care, with particular focus on the needs of patients, physicians, and the health care industry as a whole and act as a platform to catalyse and seed more innovations. Submissions to BMJ Innovations will be considered from all clinical areas of medicine along with business and process innovations that make healthcare accessible and affordable. Submissions from groups of investigators engaged in international collaborations are especially encouraged. The broad areas of innovations that this journal aims to chronicle include but are not limited to: Medical devices, mHealth and wearable health technologies, Assistive technologies, Diagnostics, Health IT, systems and process innovation.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical analysis of delivering chest compressions in virtual reality simulation: preliminary insights into fidelity and validity of virtual reality as a means of delivering life support training iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report Spreading and scaling innovation and improvement: understanding why the differences matter Role of twinnings in scaling up innovative solutions across Europe Wings of Healing: regulatory landscape, case studies and the Indian prologue of drones in healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1