一个有意识的反思:为什么脑组织通常被保存在考古记录中?评论:Petrone P, Pucci P, Niola M,等。公元79年维苏威火山喷发的热致脑玻璃化。中国生物医学工程杂志(英文版);2009;32(3):391 - 391。DOI: 10.1056 / NEJMc1909867

Alexandra L. Morton-Hayward, T. Thompson, J. Thomas-Oates, S. Buckley, A. Petzold, Abigail Ramsøe, S. O’Connor, M. Collins
{"title":"一个有意识的反思:为什么脑组织通常被保存在考古记录中?评论:Petrone P, Pucci P, Niola M,等。公元79年维苏威火山喷发的热致脑玻璃化。中国生物医学工程杂志(英文版);2009;32(3):391 - 391。DOI: 10.1056 / NEJMc1909867","authors":"Alexandra L. Morton-Hayward, T. Thompson, J. Thomas-Oates, S. Buckley, A. Petzold, Abigail Ramsøe, S. O’Connor, M. Collins","doi":"10.1080/20548923.2020.1815398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Brain tissue is ubiquitous in the archaeological record. Multiple, independent studies report the finding of black, resinous or shiny brain tissue, and Petrone et al. [2020 “Heat-induced Brain Vitrification from the Vesuvius Eruption in C.E. 79.” N Engl J Med. 382: 383–384; doi:10.1056/NEJMc1909867] raise the intriguing prospect of a role for vitrification in the preservation of ancient biomolecules. However, Petrone et al. (2020) have not made their raw data available, and no detailed laboratory or analytical methodology is offered. Issues of contamination and misinterpretation hampered a decade of research in biomolecular archaeology, such that addressing these sources of bias and facilitating validation of specious findings has become both routine and of paramount importance in the discipline. We argue that the evidence they present does not support their conclusion of heat-induced vitrification of human brain tissue, and that future studies should share palaeoproteomic data in an open access repository to facilitate comparative analysis of the recovery of ancient proteins and patterns of their degradation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":21858,"journal":{"name":"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research","volume":"67 1","pages":"87 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A conscious rethink: Why is brain tissue commonly preserved in the archaeological record? Commentary on: Petrone P, Pucci P, Niola M, et al. Heat-induced brain vitrification from the Vesuvius eruption in C.E. 79. N Engl J Med 2020;382:383-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1909867\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra L. Morton-Hayward, T. Thompson, J. Thomas-Oates, S. Buckley, A. Petzold, Abigail Ramsøe, S. O’Connor, M. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20548923.2020.1815398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Brain tissue is ubiquitous in the archaeological record. Multiple, independent studies report the finding of black, resinous or shiny brain tissue, and Petrone et al. [2020 “Heat-induced Brain Vitrification from the Vesuvius Eruption in C.E. 79.” N Engl J Med. 382: 383–384; doi:10.1056/NEJMc1909867] raise the intriguing prospect of a role for vitrification in the preservation of ancient biomolecules. However, Petrone et al. (2020) have not made their raw data available, and no detailed laboratory or analytical methodology is offered. Issues of contamination and misinterpretation hampered a decade of research in biomolecular archaeology, such that addressing these sources of bias and facilitating validation of specious findings has become both routine and of paramount importance in the discipline. We argue that the evidence they present does not support their conclusion of heat-induced vitrification of human brain tissue, and that future studies should share palaeoproteomic data in an open access repository to facilitate comparative analysis of the recovery of ancient proteins and patterns of their degradation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":21858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"87 - 95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2020.1815398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2020.1815398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

脑组织在考古记录中无处不在。多项独立研究报告发现了黑色、树脂状或有光泽的脑组织,Petrone等人[2020年]“公元79年维苏威火山喷发引起的热诱导脑玻璃化”。中华医学杂志,2016,31 (2):383-384;[doi:10.1056/NEJMc1909867]提出了玻璃化在保存古代生物分子中的作用的有趣前景。然而,Petrone等人(2020)没有提供他们的原始数据,也没有提供详细的实验室或分析方法。污染和误解的问题阻碍了生物分子考古学十年的研究,因此,解决这些偏见的来源和促进似是而非的发现的验证已经成为常规和最重要的学科。我们认为,他们提出的证据并不支持他们热诱导的人类脑组织玻璃化的结论,未来的研究应该在一个开放的存储库中共享古蛋白质组学数据,以促进对古代蛋白质的恢复及其降解模式的比较分析。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A conscious rethink: Why is brain tissue commonly preserved in the archaeological record? Commentary on: Petrone P, Pucci P, Niola M, et al. Heat-induced brain vitrification from the Vesuvius eruption in C.E. 79. N Engl J Med 2020;382:383-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1909867
ABSTRACT Brain tissue is ubiquitous in the archaeological record. Multiple, independent studies report the finding of black, resinous or shiny brain tissue, and Petrone et al. [2020 “Heat-induced Brain Vitrification from the Vesuvius Eruption in C.E. 79.” N Engl J Med. 382: 383–384; doi:10.1056/NEJMc1909867] raise the intriguing prospect of a role for vitrification in the preservation of ancient biomolecules. However, Petrone et al. (2020) have not made their raw data available, and no detailed laboratory or analytical methodology is offered. Issues of contamination and misinterpretation hampered a decade of research in biomolecular archaeology, such that addressing these sources of bias and facilitating validation of specious findings has become both routine and of paramount importance in the discipline. We argue that the evidence they present does not support their conclusion of heat-induced vitrification of human brain tissue, and that future studies should share palaeoproteomic data in an open access repository to facilitate comparative analysis of the recovery of ancient proteins and patterns of their degradation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An early Byzantine ecclesiastical complex at Ashdod-Yam: correlating geophysical prospection with excavated remains Color analysis and classification of earthenware from Phra Mahathat Woramahawihan temple in southern Thailand using machine learning GPR Mapping of buried monumental retaining walls at biblical Kiriath-Yearim near Jerusalem Landscapes of the “Coast of Death”: dolmen topographies of NW Iberia Advancing and refining archaeological dental calculus research using multiomic frameworks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1