加强吸烟风险沟通:认知需求的影响。

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Journal of Geophysical Research Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.5993/AJHB.43.5.7
Elise M Stevens, David W Wetter, Damon J Vidrine, Diana Stewart Hoover, Summer G Frank-Pearce, Nga Nguyen, Yisheng Li, Andrew J Waters, Cathy D Meade, Theodore L Wagener, Jennifer I Vidrine
{"title":"加强吸烟风险沟通:认知需求的影响。","authors":"Elise M Stevens, David W Wetter, Damon J Vidrine, Diana Stewart Hoover, Summer G Frank-Pearce, Nga Nguyen, Yisheng Li, Andrew J Waters, Cathy D Meade, Theodore L Wagener, Jennifer I Vidrine","doi":"10.5993/AJHB.43.5.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> One way to enhance the impact of smoking health risk messages may be to tailor their content to individual difference factors such as need for cognition (NFC). In this study, we examined how NFC influenced responses to different smoking risk messages. Outcomes included knowledge, risk perceptions, and behavioral expectations related to quitting smoking. <b>Methods:</b> We randomized 402 participants to one of 4 different risk message sets that were manipulated in terms of emotionality and framing in a 2x2 design: (1) factual gain-framed, (2) factual loss-framed, (3) emotional gain-framed, and (4) emotional loss-framed. <b>Results:</b> Statistically significant main effects emerged for NFC and emotionality. For certain risk perceptions, those with lower NFC reported greater perceived risk in response to emotional messages and lower risk in response to factual messages; those with higher NFC showed an opposite pattern. Similarly, those with lower NFC reported greater risk in response to gain-framed messages and lower risk in response to loss-framed messages; the opposite pattern emerged for those lower in NFC. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings highlight the importance of an individual difference variable in influencing the impact of different types of smoking risk messages.</p>","PeriodicalId":15836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research","volume":"110 1","pages":"950-962"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Smoking Risk Communications: The Influence of Need for Cognition.\",\"authors\":\"Elise M Stevens, David W Wetter, Damon J Vidrine, Diana Stewart Hoover, Summer G Frank-Pearce, Nga Nguyen, Yisheng Li, Andrew J Waters, Cathy D Meade, Theodore L Wagener, Jennifer I Vidrine\",\"doi\":\"10.5993/AJHB.43.5.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> One way to enhance the impact of smoking health risk messages may be to tailor their content to individual difference factors such as need for cognition (NFC). In this study, we examined how NFC influenced responses to different smoking risk messages. Outcomes included knowledge, risk perceptions, and behavioral expectations related to quitting smoking. <b>Methods:</b> We randomized 402 participants to one of 4 different risk message sets that were manipulated in terms of emotionality and framing in a 2x2 design: (1) factual gain-framed, (2) factual loss-framed, (3) emotional gain-framed, and (4) emotional loss-framed. <b>Results:</b> Statistically significant main effects emerged for NFC and emotionality. For certain risk perceptions, those with lower NFC reported greater perceived risk in response to emotional messages and lower risk in response to factual messages; those with higher NFC showed an opposite pattern. Similarly, those with lower NFC reported greater risk in response to gain-framed messages and lower risk in response to loss-framed messages; the opposite pattern emerged for those lower in NFC. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings highlight the importance of an individual difference variable in influencing the impact of different types of smoking risk messages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"950-962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045173/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.43.5.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.43.5.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:增强吸烟有害健康信息影响力的方法之一可能是根据个体差异因素(如认知需求(NFC))调整信息内容。在这项研究中,我们考察了 NFC 如何影响人们对不同吸烟风险信息的反应。研究结果包括与戒烟相关的知识、风险认知和行为预期。研究方法我们将 402 名参与者随机分配到 4 组不同的风险信息中的一组,这些信息在 2x2 设计中受到情绪化和框架的操纵:(1)事实性收益框架、(2)事实性损失框架、(3)情绪性收益框架和(4)情绪性损失框架。结果NFC 和情绪化的主效应具有统计学意义。在某些风险感知方面,NFC 较低的人对情感信息的感知风险较大,而对事实信息的感知风险较小;NFC 较高的人则表现出相反的模式。同样,NFC 较低的人对收益型信息的风险感知较大,而对损失型信息的风险感知较小;NFC 较低的人则表现出相反的模式。结论:研究结果凸显了个体差异变量在影响不同类型的吸烟风险信息影响方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Smoking Risk Communications: The Influence of Need for Cognition.

Objectives: One way to enhance the impact of smoking health risk messages may be to tailor their content to individual difference factors such as need for cognition (NFC). In this study, we examined how NFC influenced responses to different smoking risk messages. Outcomes included knowledge, risk perceptions, and behavioral expectations related to quitting smoking. Methods: We randomized 402 participants to one of 4 different risk message sets that were manipulated in terms of emotionality and framing in a 2x2 design: (1) factual gain-framed, (2) factual loss-framed, (3) emotional gain-framed, and (4) emotional loss-framed. Results: Statistically significant main effects emerged for NFC and emotionality. For certain risk perceptions, those with lower NFC reported greater perceived risk in response to emotional messages and lower risk in response to factual messages; those with higher NFC showed an opposite pattern. Similarly, those with lower NFC reported greater risk in response to gain-framed messages and lower risk in response to loss-framed messages; the opposite pattern emerged for those lower in NFC. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of an individual difference variable in influencing the impact of different types of smoking risk messages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research
Journal of Geophysical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) publishes original scientific research on the physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the understanding of the Earth, Sun, and solar system and all of their environments and components. JGR is currently organized into seven disciplinary sections (Atmospheres, Biogeosciences, Earth Surface, Oceans, Planets, Solid Earth, Space Physics). Sections may be added or combined in response to changes in the science.
期刊最新文献
The Human Mitochondrial Genome Encodes for an Interferon-Responsive Host Defense Peptide. Comparative study on the bioavailability of peptide extracts from Jeju black pigs and three-way crossbred pigs. Comparative Efficacy of Epley, Semont and Gans Maneuver in Treating Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. Evaluation of Medial Retrotympanum by High-Resolution Computed Tomography and Endoscopy - A Descriptive Study. Heparin Binding Protein in Early Differential Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1