两种下颌骨推进矫形器对颞下颌关节的影响

L. Chèze , B. Navailles
{"title":"两种下颌骨推进矫形器对颞下颌关节的影响","authors":"L. Chèze ,&nbsp;B. Navailles","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmret.2007.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Understand mechanical forces applied on the temporo-mandibular joint by two different designs of mandibular advancement devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and measurements</h3><p>Rigid elements model of the temporo-mandibular joint, taking into account six muscles, was developed. A study is designed to compare traction based vs. compression based devices, with mandible in a 10 mm protrusion position. Static equilibrium can be written as hyperstatic equations and resolution is obtained through numeric optimization of different criteria under constraints.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For compression based device, equation results show that important strength is applied in the masseter and posterior temporal. As both muscles lift the mandible up, this implies mouth opening happens when these muscles are at rest. However, the traction based device enables 10 mm protrusion with minimal effort on these muscles. Additionally, joint contact strength is consistently less (10%) with traction based device than with compression based device.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This simple mechanical model enables comparison of mandibular advancement devices with different modes of action. The results found are consistent with the ones from literature. Findings on studied parameters (mouth opening, joint contact strength) may imply an improved side-effect and a compliance profile in clinical practice for traction-based over compression-based mechanisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100733,"journal":{"name":"ITBM-RBM","volume":"27 5","pages":"Pages 233-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbmret.2007.01.004","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact de deux orthèses d'avancée mandibulaire sur l'articulation temporomandibulaire\",\"authors\":\"L. Chèze ,&nbsp;B. Navailles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbmret.2007.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Understand mechanical forces applied on the temporo-mandibular joint by two different designs of mandibular advancement devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and measurements</h3><p>Rigid elements model of the temporo-mandibular joint, taking into account six muscles, was developed. A study is designed to compare traction based vs. compression based devices, with mandible in a 10 mm protrusion position. Static equilibrium can be written as hyperstatic equations and resolution is obtained through numeric optimization of different criteria under constraints.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For compression based device, equation results show that important strength is applied in the masseter and posterior temporal. As both muscles lift the mandible up, this implies mouth opening happens when these muscles are at rest. However, the traction based device enables 10 mm protrusion with minimal effort on these muscles. Additionally, joint contact strength is consistently less (10%) with traction based device than with compression based device.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This simple mechanical model enables comparison of mandibular advancement devices with different modes of action. The results found are consistent with the ones from literature. Findings on studied parameters (mouth opening, joint contact strength) may imply an improved side-effect and a compliance profile in clinical practice for traction-based over compression-based mechanisms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ITBM-RBM\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 233-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbmret.2007.01.004\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ITBM-RBM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297956207000058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITBM-RBM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297956207000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的了解两种不同设计的下颌推进装置对颞下颌关节施加的机械力。方法与测量建立了考虑六块肌肉的颞下颌关节刚性单元模型。一项研究的目的是比较基于牵引和基于压缩的设备,下颌骨在10毫米的突出位置。静力平衡可以写成超静力方程,在约束条件下对不同准则进行数值优化求解。结果对于基于压缩的器械,方程结果表明咬肌和后颞部有重要的强度作用。当这两块肌肉抬起下颌骨时,这意味着当这两块肌肉休息时张嘴。然而,基于牵引的装置可以在这些肌肉上以最小的努力实现10毫米的突出。此外,与基于压缩的装置相比,基于牵引的装置的关节接触强度始终小于10%。结论该简单的力学模型可以比较不同作用方式的下颌前移装置。研究结果与文献结果一致。研究参数(开口,关节接触强度)的结果可能意味着在临床实践中基于牵引的机制比基于压缩的机制的副作用和依从性有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact de deux orthèses d'avancée mandibulaire sur l'articulation temporomandibulaire

Objectives

Understand mechanical forces applied on the temporo-mandibular joint by two different designs of mandibular advancement devices.

Methods and measurements

Rigid elements model of the temporo-mandibular joint, taking into account six muscles, was developed. A study is designed to compare traction based vs. compression based devices, with mandible in a 10 mm protrusion position. Static equilibrium can be written as hyperstatic equations and resolution is obtained through numeric optimization of different criteria under constraints.

Results

For compression based device, equation results show that important strength is applied in the masseter and posterior temporal. As both muscles lift the mandible up, this implies mouth opening happens when these muscles are at rest. However, the traction based device enables 10 mm protrusion with minimal effort on these muscles. Additionally, joint contact strength is consistently less (10%) with traction based device than with compression based device.

Conclusion

This simple mechanical model enables comparison of mandibular advancement devices with different modes of action. The results found are consistent with the ones from literature. Findings on studied parameters (mouth opening, joint contact strength) may imply an improved side-effect and a compliance profile in clinical practice for traction-based over compression-based mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxygéenateurs : évolution et nouveautés Oxygenators : evolution and update Sortie de CEC difficile : tableaux cliniques et modalités thérapeutiques Phase contact dans la réponse hémostatique et vasculaire vers un système intégré Place de l'aprotinine en chirurgie cardiaque Déficit acquis en Antithrombine et hemofiltration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1