编辑介绍

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1177/0084672420909477
F. Watts
{"title":"编辑介绍","authors":"F. Watts","doi":"10.1177/0084672420909477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers in this Special Issue arise from a conference on Religion, Evolution, and Social Bonding, held in Eynsham Hall, Oxfordshire, UK, in July 2019, organised by the International Society for Science and Religion (ISSR). The conference was part of a programme of research on Religion and the Social Brain, funded by a grant from the Templeton Religion Trust to ISSR (TRT 0153), for which the Society is very grateful. In this short editorial introduction, I will briefly introduce some of the key ideas of the following papers, leaving subtleties and nuances to the papers themselves. This set of papers considers the interaction between evolutionary theory and religion quite broadly. It includes work on the evolution of religion itself, in which there are still many interesting issues to be explored. However, it also considers human evolution more broadly and the role of religion in that. There are benefits in nesting work on the evolution of religion in a broader approach to human evolution. We assume that it is helpful to focus on both the preconditions for the evolutionary development of religion and the consequences of that development. The debate about whether religion is adaptive or a by-product has tended to focus attention on one or the other. We want to consider both. We assume that there are certain human capacities that are necessary for religion to begin to emerge in the course of evolution, and also that religion has significant consequences for human evolution more generally. Much recent work on the evolution of religion has been nested within the cognitive science of religion (CSR), which assumes that cognitive evolution plays the primary role in the evolution of religion. However, we are pleased to note that there has recently been a significant broadening in how the CSR proceeds, influenced by people such as Armin Geertz. CSR has now become more willing to consider biological and social factors, as well as cognitive ones. The approach set out here sits uneasily with a narrowly defined evolutionary CSR, but can be situated within a more broadly conceived one that is open to social and biological factors. Leon Turner discusses this further in the opening paper in this Special Issue.","PeriodicalId":44899,"journal":{"name":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial introduction\",\"authors\":\"F. Watts\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0084672420909477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The papers in this Special Issue arise from a conference on Religion, Evolution, and Social Bonding, held in Eynsham Hall, Oxfordshire, UK, in July 2019, organised by the International Society for Science and Religion (ISSR). The conference was part of a programme of research on Religion and the Social Brain, funded by a grant from the Templeton Religion Trust to ISSR (TRT 0153), for which the Society is very grateful. In this short editorial introduction, I will briefly introduce some of the key ideas of the following papers, leaving subtleties and nuances to the papers themselves. This set of papers considers the interaction between evolutionary theory and religion quite broadly. It includes work on the evolution of religion itself, in which there are still many interesting issues to be explored. However, it also considers human evolution more broadly and the role of religion in that. There are benefits in nesting work on the evolution of religion in a broader approach to human evolution. We assume that it is helpful to focus on both the preconditions for the evolutionary development of religion and the consequences of that development. The debate about whether religion is adaptive or a by-product has tended to focus attention on one or the other. We want to consider both. We assume that there are certain human capacities that are necessary for religion to begin to emerge in the course of evolution, and also that religion has significant consequences for human evolution more generally. Much recent work on the evolution of religion has been nested within the cognitive science of religion (CSR), which assumes that cognitive evolution plays the primary role in the evolution of religion. However, we are pleased to note that there has recently been a significant broadening in how the CSR proceeds, influenced by people such as Armin Geertz. CSR has now become more willing to consider biological and social factors, as well as cognitive ones. The approach set out here sits uneasily with a narrowly defined evolutionary CSR, but can be situated within a more broadly conceived one that is open to social and biological factors. Leon Turner discusses this further in the opening paper in this Special Issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420909477\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420909477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊中的论文来自于2019年7月由国际科学与宗教学会(ISSR)组织在英国牛津郡埃恩舍姆厅举行的宗教、进化和社会纽带会议。这次会议是宗教与社会大脑研究项目的一部分,由邓普顿宗教信托基金资助ISSR (TRT 0153), ISSR对此表示非常感谢。在这篇简短的社论导言中,我将简要介绍以下论文的一些关键思想,将微妙和细微差别留给论文本身。这组论文相当广泛地考虑了进化论和宗教之间的相互作用。它包括对宗教本身演变的研究,其中仍有许多有趣的问题有待探索。然而,它也更广泛地考虑了人类的进化以及宗教在其中的作用。在更广泛的人类进化方法中,对宗教进化的研究是有好处的。我们认为,关注宗教进化发展的前提条件和这种发展的后果是有帮助的。关于宗教是适应性的还是副产品的争论往往集中在其中一个或另一个上。我们两者都要考虑。我们假设,宗教在进化过程中开始出现,人类的某些能力是必要的,而且宗教对人类进化有更普遍的重要影响。最近关于宗教进化的许多研究都是在宗教认知科学(CSR)中进行的,该科学假设认知进化在宗教进化中起着主要作用。然而,我们很高兴地注意到,最近在阿明·格尔茨等人的影响下,企业社会责任的进展有了显著的扩大。企业社会责任现在更愿意考虑生物和社会因素,以及认知因素。这里所提出的方法与狭义的进化型CSR格格不入,但可以置于一个更广泛的概念中,即对社会和生物因素开放。莱昂·特纳在本期特刊的开篇文章中进一步讨论了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial introduction
The papers in this Special Issue arise from a conference on Religion, Evolution, and Social Bonding, held in Eynsham Hall, Oxfordshire, UK, in July 2019, organised by the International Society for Science and Religion (ISSR). The conference was part of a programme of research on Religion and the Social Brain, funded by a grant from the Templeton Religion Trust to ISSR (TRT 0153), for which the Society is very grateful. In this short editorial introduction, I will briefly introduce some of the key ideas of the following papers, leaving subtleties and nuances to the papers themselves. This set of papers considers the interaction between evolutionary theory and religion quite broadly. It includes work on the evolution of religion itself, in which there are still many interesting issues to be explored. However, it also considers human evolution more broadly and the role of religion in that. There are benefits in nesting work on the evolution of religion in a broader approach to human evolution. We assume that it is helpful to focus on both the preconditions for the evolutionary development of religion and the consequences of that development. The debate about whether religion is adaptive or a by-product has tended to focus attention on one or the other. We want to consider both. We assume that there are certain human capacities that are necessary for religion to begin to emerge in the course of evolution, and also that religion has significant consequences for human evolution more generally. Much recent work on the evolution of religion has been nested within the cognitive science of religion (CSR), which assumes that cognitive evolution plays the primary role in the evolution of religion. However, we are pleased to note that there has recently been a significant broadening in how the CSR proceeds, influenced by people such as Armin Geertz. CSR has now become more willing to consider biological and social factors, as well as cognitive ones. The approach set out here sits uneasily with a narrowly defined evolutionary CSR, but can be situated within a more broadly conceived one that is open to social and biological factors. Leon Turner discusses this further in the opening paper in this Special Issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The international, peer-reviewed journal Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is the oldest periodical that publishes research in the psychology of religion. It is the organ of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR), founded in 1914. The Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is open to all scientific methodologies, both quantitative and qualitative.
期刊最新文献
Intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation as a moderator of key predictors of romantic relationship commitment The experience of, and beliefs about, divine grace in mainline protestant Christianity: A consensual qualitative approach Unpackaging gender differences in justifying morally debatable behaviors around the world: The role of personal religiosity and society’s socialization priorities for its children Contributions of Muslim medieval scholars to psychology A comprehensive literature review of Islam-oriented scales on religiosity, spirituality, and morality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1