澳大利亚国防:对“审查”的回顾

IF 0.1 Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.22459/AG.19.01.2012.04

H. Ergas

{"title":"澳大利亚国防:对“审查”的回顾","authors":"H. Ergas","doi":"10.22459/AG.19.01.2012.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian Defence Force is held in high regard; the Department of Defence is not. Longstanding concerns about inefficiency, compounded by a succession of fiascos and bungles, have entrenched the perception that Defence is poorly managed. Earlier attempts at reform have yielded mixed, often disappointing, results (see Ergas and Thomson 2011), and the years since 2009 have seen a series of reviews aimed at improving performance, culminating in 22 defence-related reviews in 2011-12 alone.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"45 1","pages":"63-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australia's defence: A review of the 'reviews'\",\"authors\":\"H. Ergas\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/AG.19.01.2012.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Australian Defence Force is held in high regard; the Department of Defence is not. Longstanding concerns about inefficiency, compounded by a succession of fiascos and bungles, have entrenched the perception that Defence is poorly managed. Earlier attempts at reform have yielded mixed, often disappointing, results (see Ergas and Thomson 2011), and the years since 2009 have seen a series of reviews aimed at improving performance, culminating in 22 defence-related reviews in 2011-12 alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"63-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.19.01.2012.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.19.01.2012.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚国防军受到高度重视;但国防部却不是。长期以来对低效的担忧，再加上一连串的惨败和失误，已经根深蒂固地认为国防部管理不善。早些时候的改革尝试产生了喜忧参半的结果，往往令人失望(见Ergas和Thomson 2011)，自2009年以来的几年里，我们看到了一系列旨在提高绩效的评估，仅在2011-12年就有22项与国防相关的评估达到高潮。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Australia's defence: A review of the 'reviews'

The Australian Defence Force is held in high regard; the Department of Defence is not. Longstanding concerns about inefficiency, compounded by a succession of fiascos and bungles, have entrenched the perception that Defence is poorly managed. Earlier attempts at reform have yielded mixed, often disappointing, results (see Ergas and Thomson 2011), and the years since 2009 have seen a series of reviews aimed at improving performance, culminating in 22 defence-related reviews in 2011-12 alone.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform ECONOMICS-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Structural reform of the Reserve Bank of Australia Which public debt should be paid off? ssessing the risks from Australia’s economic exposure to China Is quantitative easing good policy? Public infrastructure investment in the time of Covid