基于主成分分析修正水质指数的华北平原黄壁庄地下水水质评价

Shuang Gan, M. Zhang, Kaining Yu, Yahong Zhou, Bai-zhong Yan
{"title":"基于主成分分析修正水质指数的华北平原黄壁庄地下水水质评价","authors":"Shuang Gan, M. Zhang, Kaining Yu, Yahong Zhou, Bai-zhong Yan","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2022.2154193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study was carried out to evaluate the groundwater quality in Huangbizhuang town, which is an important water source for Shijiazhuang and Beijing, China. Fifty-six geo-referenced water samples were collected from pumping and monitoring wells from July to September 2018. The study investigated the applicability of two weighting methods, the expert weighting method, and the principal component analysis weighting method, to water quality assessment and evaluated the water quality status and the leading causes of groundwater pollution by chemical analysis index and multivariate statistical methods. The results show that the overall quality is good, and shallow and deep groundwater in the study area is generally suitable for drinking and irrigation. The WQI of the expert weighting method reveals that 74.36% of the shallow groundwater and 58.82% of the deep groundwater is excellent. Shallow groundwater has a close hydraulic connection with surface water, and the water quality of shallow groundwater is superior to that of deep groundwater. Compared with the expert weighting method, the weight of natural factors is larger, and the WQI value is higher in PCA weighting. Since no subjective factor is involved, the PCA weighting method is more objective and more suitable for the study area. In addition, multivariate statistical calculation results show groundwater pollution is due to both point source pollution, industrial activities, and non-point source pollution, such as agricultural activities.","PeriodicalId":13141,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","volume":"115 1","pages":"597 - 620"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Groundwater quality assessment using principal component analysis modified water quality index in the Huangbizhuang, Northern China Plain\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Gan, M. Zhang, Kaining Yu, Yahong Zhou, Bai-zhong Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10807039.2022.2154193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study was carried out to evaluate the groundwater quality in Huangbizhuang town, which is an important water source for Shijiazhuang and Beijing, China. Fifty-six geo-referenced water samples were collected from pumping and monitoring wells from July to September 2018. The study investigated the applicability of two weighting methods, the expert weighting method, and the principal component analysis weighting method, to water quality assessment and evaluated the water quality status and the leading causes of groundwater pollution by chemical analysis index and multivariate statistical methods. The results show that the overall quality is good, and shallow and deep groundwater in the study area is generally suitable for drinking and irrigation. The WQI of the expert weighting method reveals that 74.36% of the shallow groundwater and 58.82% of the deep groundwater is excellent. Shallow groundwater has a close hydraulic connection with surface water, and the water quality of shallow groundwater is superior to that of deep groundwater. Compared with the expert weighting method, the weight of natural factors is larger, and the WQI value is higher in PCA weighting. Since no subjective factor is involved, the PCA weighting method is more objective and more suitable for the study area. In addition, multivariate statistical calculation results show groundwater pollution is due to both point source pollution, industrial activities, and non-point source pollution, such as agricultural activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"597 - 620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2154193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2154193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要以石家庄市和北京市重要水源地黄壁庄镇为研究对象,开展了地下水水质评价研究。2018年7月至9月,从抽水和监测井中收集了56个地理参考水样。研究了专家加权法和主成分分析加权法两种加权方法在水质评价中的适用性,采用化学分析指标和多元统计方法对水质状况和地下水污染的主要原因进行了评价。结果表明,研究区地下水水质总体较好,浅层和深层地下水基本适合饮用和灌溉。专家加权法的WQI结果显示,74.36%的浅层地下水和58.82%的深层地下水为优。浅层地下水与地表水有密切的水力联系,浅层地下水水质优于深层地下水。与专家加权法相比,主成分加权的自然因子权重更大,WQI值更高。由于不涉及主观因素,PCA加权法更客观,更适合研究区域。此外,多元统计计算结果表明,地下水污染既有点源污染、工业活动污染,也有非点源污染,如农业活动污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Groundwater quality assessment using principal component analysis modified water quality index in the Huangbizhuang, Northern China Plain
Abstract This study was carried out to evaluate the groundwater quality in Huangbizhuang town, which is an important water source for Shijiazhuang and Beijing, China. Fifty-six geo-referenced water samples were collected from pumping and monitoring wells from July to September 2018. The study investigated the applicability of two weighting methods, the expert weighting method, and the principal component analysis weighting method, to water quality assessment and evaluated the water quality status and the leading causes of groundwater pollution by chemical analysis index and multivariate statistical methods. The results show that the overall quality is good, and shallow and deep groundwater in the study area is generally suitable for drinking and irrigation. The WQI of the expert weighting method reveals that 74.36% of the shallow groundwater and 58.82% of the deep groundwater is excellent. Shallow groundwater has a close hydraulic connection with surface water, and the water quality of shallow groundwater is superior to that of deep groundwater. Compared with the expert weighting method, the weight of natural factors is larger, and the WQI value is higher in PCA weighting. Since no subjective factor is involved, the PCA weighting method is more objective and more suitable for the study area. In addition, multivariate statistical calculation results show groundwater pollution is due to both point source pollution, industrial activities, and non-point source pollution, such as agricultural activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental implication identification on water quality variation and human health risk assessment in the middle and lower reaches of the Hanjiang River, China Estimation of glyphosate biological half-life among farmers and residents in Thailand Integrating ecosystem service value in the disclosure of landscape ecological risk changes: a case study in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China Exposure level and risk assessment of atrazine in Chinese adults based on the systematic review data and the Monte Carlo simulation method A novel biomonitoring method to detect pyrethroid metabolites in saliva of occupationally exposed workers as a tool for risk assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1