导致全球金融危机的监管因素

Q1 Arts and Humanities Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Pub Date : 2009-06-19 DOI:10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1057
Nestor A. Espenilla
{"title":"导致全球金融危机的监管因素","authors":"Nestor A. Espenilla","doi":"10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The source of the global financial crisis of 2008 may be viewed from two ideological perspectives: regulatory failure in the credit risk transfer (CRT) market; and monetary laxity, pointing to the inherent nature of financial regulation. This paper is an exposition of the regulatory factors that contributed to the global financial crisis by highlighting the weaknesses in the CRT market believed to have catalyzed the present economic slowdown. These factors include active involvement of unregulated entities in the market; divergent regulatory treatment of CRT transactions across different financial institutions; insufficient supervisory data on CRT transactions; and insufficient capital requirement for CRT transactions. The paper addresses the presence of monetary laxity evidenced by the procyclical nature of some policies that reinforced the market downturn. It looks into each factor closely before concluding that regulations are by no means, an easy task. They have to constantly strike a balance between allowing innovations for the development of the financial markets to support further development in the real economy and ensuring a stable financial system. The bottom line is for regulators to caution themselves against over-regulation that would inhibit innovation which is a tempting proposition amidst all these issues on regulatory failure.","PeriodicalId":39323,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory Factors that Contributed to the Global Financial Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Nestor A. Espenilla\",\"doi\":\"10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The source of the global financial crisis of 2008 may be viewed from two ideological perspectives: regulatory failure in the credit risk transfer (CRT) market; and monetary laxity, pointing to the inherent nature of financial regulation. This paper is an exposition of the regulatory factors that contributed to the global financial crisis by highlighting the weaknesses in the CRT market believed to have catalyzed the present economic slowdown. These factors include active involvement of unregulated entities in the market; divergent regulatory treatment of CRT transactions across different financial institutions; insufficient supervisory data on CRT transactions; and insufficient capital requirement for CRT transactions. The paper addresses the presence of monetary laxity evidenced by the procyclical nature of some policies that reinforced the market downturn. It looks into each factor closely before concluding that regulations are by no means, an easy task. They have to constantly strike a balance between allowing innovations for the development of the financial markets to support further development in the real economy and ensuring a stable financial system. The bottom line is for regulators to caution themselves against over-regulation that would inhibit innovation which is a tempting proposition amidst all these issues on regulatory failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2008年全球金融危机的根源可以从两个意识形态的角度来看待:信用风险转移(CRT)市场的监管失灵;货币宽松,指向金融监管的内在本质。本文通过强调CRT市场的弱点,阐述了导致全球金融危机的监管因素,这些弱点被认为催化了当前的经济放缓。这些因素包括不受监管的实体积极参与市场;不同金融机构对CRT交易的监管处理存在差异;CRT交易监管数据不足;以及CRT交易的资本金要求不足。本文讨论了货币宽松的存在,一些政策的顺周期性质证明了这一点,这些政策加剧了市场低迷。在得出监管绝非易事的结论之前,它仔细研究了每一个因素。他们必须在允许金融市场创新发展以支持实体经济进一步发展和确保金融体系稳定之间不断取得平衡。监管机构的底线是告诫自己不要过度监管,否则会抑制创新,在所有这些监管失败的问题中,这是一个诱人的提议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulatory Factors that Contributed to the Global Financial Crisis
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The source of the global financial crisis of 2008 may be viewed from two ideological perspectives: regulatory failure in the credit risk transfer (CRT) market; and monetary laxity, pointing to the inherent nature of financial regulation. This paper is an exposition of the regulatory factors that contributed to the global financial crisis by highlighting the weaknesses in the CRT market believed to have catalyzed the present economic slowdown. These factors include active involvement of unregulated entities in the market; divergent regulatory treatment of CRT transactions across different financial institutions; insufficient supervisory data on CRT transactions; and insufficient capital requirement for CRT transactions. The paper addresses the presence of monetary laxity evidenced by the procyclical nature of some policies that reinforced the market downturn. It looks into each factor closely before concluding that regulations are by no means, an easy task. They have to constantly strike a balance between allowing innovations for the development of the financial markets to support further development in the real economy and ensuring a stable financial system. The bottom line is for regulators to caution themselves against over-regulation that would inhibit innovation which is a tempting proposition amidst all these issues on regulatory failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Social Science Review
Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Social Science Review (APSSR) is an internationally refereed journal published biannually (June and December) by De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. It aims to be a leading venue for authors seeking to share their data and perspectives on compelling and emerging topics in the social sciences with, and to create an impact on, the region’s communities of academics, researchers, students, civil society, policymakers, development specialists, among others. Topics related to or with implications for the region that are pursued employing sound methodologies and comparative, and inter, multi and transdisciplinary approaches are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
From the Editor: Vol.10(2) 2010 Effect of District Magnitude on Electoral Corruption under a Block Vote System: The Case of Thailand Renewable Energy (RE) Sector Development in the Philippines Based on the Perspectives and Experiences of Selected Industry Managers Fiction as Fact: False Memories of WWII in the Philippines The State and "Transnational Advocacy Networks" in the Prevention and Control of Transnational Crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1