立体三维显示中空间交错引起的深度伪影

IF 1.9 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Applied Perception Pub Date : 2015-02-17 DOI:10.1145/2699266
Jussi H. Hakala, P. Oittinen, J. Häkkinen
{"title":"立体三维显示中空间交错引起的深度伪影","authors":"Jussi H. Hakala, P. Oittinen, J. Häkkinen","doi":"10.1145/2699266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most spatially interlacing stereoscopic 3D displays display odd and even rows of an image to either the left or the right eye of the viewer. The visual system then fuses the interlaced image into a single percept. This row-based interlacing creates a small vertical disparity between the images; however, interlacing may also induce horizontal disparities, thus generating depth artifacts. Whether people perceive the depth artifacts and, if so, what is the magnitude of the artifacts are unknown. In this study, we hypothesized and tested if people perceive interlaced edges on different depth levels. We tested oblique edge orientations ranging from 2 degrees to 32 degrees and pixel sizes ranging from 16 to 79 arcsec of visual angle in a depth probe experiment. Five participants viewed the visual stimuli through a stereoscope under three viewing conditions: noninterlaced, interlaced, and row averaged (i.e., where even and odd rows are averaged). Our results indicated that people perceive depth artifacts when viewing interlaced stereoscopic images and that these depth artifacts increase with pixel size and decrease with edge orientation angle. A pixel size of 32 arcsec of visual angle still evoked depth percepts, whereas 16 arcsec did not. Row-averaging images effectively eliminated these depth artifacts. These findings have implications for display design, content production, image quality studies, and stereoscopic games and software.","PeriodicalId":50921,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception","volume":"99 1","pages":"3:1-3:13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depth Artifacts Caused by Spatial Interlacing in Stereoscopic 3D Displays\",\"authors\":\"Jussi H. Hakala, P. Oittinen, J. Häkkinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2699266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most spatially interlacing stereoscopic 3D displays display odd and even rows of an image to either the left or the right eye of the viewer. The visual system then fuses the interlaced image into a single percept. This row-based interlacing creates a small vertical disparity between the images; however, interlacing may also induce horizontal disparities, thus generating depth artifacts. Whether people perceive the depth artifacts and, if so, what is the magnitude of the artifacts are unknown. In this study, we hypothesized and tested if people perceive interlaced edges on different depth levels. We tested oblique edge orientations ranging from 2 degrees to 32 degrees and pixel sizes ranging from 16 to 79 arcsec of visual angle in a depth probe experiment. Five participants viewed the visual stimuli through a stereoscope under three viewing conditions: noninterlaced, interlaced, and row averaged (i.e., where even and odd rows are averaged). Our results indicated that people perceive depth artifacts when viewing interlaced stereoscopic images and that these depth artifacts increase with pixel size and decrease with edge orientation angle. A pixel size of 32 arcsec of visual angle still evoked depth percepts, whereas 16 arcsec did not. Row-averaging images effectively eliminated these depth artifacts. These findings have implications for display design, content production, image quality studies, and stereoscopic games and software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"3:1-3:13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2699266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2699266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

大多数空间交错立体3D显示器将图像的奇数行和偶数行显示给观看者的左眼或右眼。然后,视觉系统将交错的图像融合成一个单一的感知。这种基于行的交错在图像之间产生了一个小的垂直差;然而,隔行也可能引起水平差异,从而产生深度伪影。人们是否感知到深度人工制品,如果是,人工制品的大小是未知的。在这项研究中,我们假设并测试了人们是否在不同的深度层次上感知到交错的边缘。在深度探测实验中,我们测试了倾斜边缘方向从2度到32度,像素大小从16到79弧秒的视角。五名参与者在三种观看条件下通过立体镜观看视觉刺激:非隔行、隔行和平均行(即偶数行和奇数行平均)。结果表明,人们在观看隔行立体图像时,会感知到深度伪影,并且这些深度伪影随像素大小而增大,随边缘方向角度而减小。当像素大小为32弧秒的视角时,深度感知仍然存在,而16弧秒的视角则没有。行平均图像有效地消除了这些深度伪影。这些发现对显示设计、内容制作、图像质量研究、立体游戏和软件都有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depth Artifacts Caused by Spatial Interlacing in Stereoscopic 3D Displays
Most spatially interlacing stereoscopic 3D displays display odd and even rows of an image to either the left or the right eye of the viewer. The visual system then fuses the interlaced image into a single percept. This row-based interlacing creates a small vertical disparity between the images; however, interlacing may also induce horizontal disparities, thus generating depth artifacts. Whether people perceive the depth artifacts and, if so, what is the magnitude of the artifacts are unknown. In this study, we hypothesized and tested if people perceive interlaced edges on different depth levels. We tested oblique edge orientations ranging from 2 degrees to 32 degrees and pixel sizes ranging from 16 to 79 arcsec of visual angle in a depth probe experiment. Five participants viewed the visual stimuli through a stereoscope under three viewing conditions: noninterlaced, interlaced, and row averaged (i.e., where even and odd rows are averaged). Our results indicated that people perceive depth artifacts when viewing interlaced stereoscopic images and that these depth artifacts increase with pixel size and decrease with edge orientation angle. A pixel size of 32 arcsec of visual angle still evoked depth percepts, whereas 16 arcsec did not. Row-averaging images effectively eliminated these depth artifacts. These findings have implications for display design, content production, image quality studies, and stereoscopic games and software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) aims to strengthen the synergy between computer science and psychology/perception by publishing top quality papers that help to unify research in these fields. The journal publishes inter-disciplinary research of significant and lasting value in any topic area that spans both Computer Science and Perceptual Psychology. All papers must incorporate both perceptual and computer science components.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Impact of Visual and Kinematic Information on the Perception of Physicality Errors Decoding Functional Brain Data for Emotion Recognition: A Machine Learning Approach Assessing Human Reactions in a Virtual Crowd Based on Crowd Disposition, Perceived Agency, and User Traits Color Hint-guided Ink Wash Painting Colorization with Ink Style Prediction Mechanism Adaptation to Simulated Hypergravity in a Virtual Reality Throwing Task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1