基于castolan阶段的学生SPLDV问题解题错误分析——从学生认知风格看

Evinia Kusuma Dewi, N. Nizaruddin, A. S. Pramasdyahsari
{"title":"基于castolan阶段的学生SPLDV问题解题错误分析——从学生认知风格看","authors":"Evinia Kusuma Dewi, N. Nizaruddin, A. S. Pramasdyahsari","doi":"10.26877/ijre.v1i2.8626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the description of students' errors in solving SPLDV questions in terms of students' reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. This research is a qualitative research using a descriptive approach which was carried out at MTs Husnul Khatimah 02 Semarang in the 2020/2021 academic year. The subjects of this study were grade VIII students with reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. The instrument used is a cognitive style questionnaire, namely the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) developed by Warli, the SPLDV problem solving test and interview guidelines. Checking the validity of the data in this study is time triangulation. The indicator of student errors is based on the Kastolan stages, namely procedural errors, conceptual errors, and technical errors. The results of this study are students with an impulsive cognitive style tend to have more errors than students with a reflective cognitive style. Internal factors that cause errors are because students are less thorough, lack of practice questions, do not understand the prerequisite material, do not understand the concept of solving linear inequality problems of two variables, and do not understand the basic concepts of elimination and substitution methods, while the external factor is the lack of time given to students. so that students have not finished working on the questions","PeriodicalId":90868,"journal":{"name":"International journal of quantitative research in education","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN SOLVING SPLDV QUESTIONS BASED ON CASTOLAN STAGES REVIEWED FROM STUDENTS' COGNITIVE STYLE\",\"authors\":\"Evinia Kusuma Dewi, N. Nizaruddin, A. S. Pramasdyahsari\",\"doi\":\"10.26877/ijre.v1i2.8626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the description of students' errors in solving SPLDV questions in terms of students' reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. This research is a qualitative research using a descriptive approach which was carried out at MTs Husnul Khatimah 02 Semarang in the 2020/2021 academic year. The subjects of this study were grade VIII students with reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. The instrument used is a cognitive style questionnaire, namely the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) developed by Warli, the SPLDV problem solving test and interview guidelines. Checking the validity of the data in this study is time triangulation. The indicator of student errors is based on the Kastolan stages, namely procedural errors, conceptual errors, and technical errors. The results of this study are students with an impulsive cognitive style tend to have more errors than students with a reflective cognitive style. Internal factors that cause errors are because students are less thorough, lack of practice questions, do not understand the prerequisite material, do not understand the concept of solving linear inequality problems of two variables, and do not understand the basic concepts of elimination and substitution methods, while the external factor is the lack of time given to students. so that students have not finished working on the questions\",\"PeriodicalId\":90868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of quantitative research in education\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of quantitative research in education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v1i2.8626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of quantitative research in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v1i2.8626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在确定学生反思性认知风格和冲动性认知风格对学生解决SPLDV问题错误的描述。本研究是一项定性研究,使用描述性方法,于2020/2021学年在三宝朗大学胡士努尔·哈提玛02进行。本研究以具有反思性和冲动性认知风格的八年级学生为研究对象。使用的工具是认知风格问卷,即Warli开发的匹配熟悉图测试(MFFT), SPLDV问题解决测试和访谈指南。检验本研究数据有效性的方法是时间三角剖分。学生错误的指标是基于Kastolan阶段,即程序错误、概念错误和技术错误。本研究结果表明,冲动型认知风格的学生比反思型认知风格的学生更容易出现错误。造成误差的内部因素是由于学生不彻底,缺乏习题,不了解前提材料,不了解求解二元线性不等式问题的概念,不了解消元法和代换法的基本概念,而外部因素是没有给学生足够的时间。所以学生们还没有完成问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN SOLVING SPLDV QUESTIONS BASED ON CASTOLAN STAGES REVIEWED FROM STUDENTS' COGNITIVE STYLE
This study aims to determine the description of students' errors in solving SPLDV questions in terms of students' reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. This research is a qualitative research using a descriptive approach which was carried out at MTs Husnul Khatimah 02 Semarang in the 2020/2021 academic year. The subjects of this study were grade VIII students with reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. The instrument used is a cognitive style questionnaire, namely the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) developed by Warli, the SPLDV problem solving test and interview guidelines. Checking the validity of the data in this study is time triangulation. The indicator of student errors is based on the Kastolan stages, namely procedural errors, conceptual errors, and technical errors. The results of this study are students with an impulsive cognitive style tend to have more errors than students with a reflective cognitive style. Internal factors that cause errors are because students are less thorough, lack of practice questions, do not understand the prerequisite material, do not understand the concept of solving linear inequality problems of two variables, and do not understand the basic concepts of elimination and substitution methods, while the external factor is the lack of time given to students. so that students have not finished working on the questions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of The Independent Teaching Platform (PMM) in Increasing The Competency of Primary and Secondary Education Teachers The Art of Questioning in Online Learning: Effective Questioning Strategies in EFL Reading Class Pragmatics Perspective of Genre-based Approach Essay Writing Textbook to Improve Students’ Writing Skills at English Education Department of Universitas PGRI Semarang The Influence of Lunges and Rubber Load Exercises on Ap Chagi Kick Speed in UNTAD Taekwondo Club (UTC) Athletes The Effects of Using Flashcard Learning Media to Improve Reading Comprehension in Children with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1