线程受欢迎程度不平等作为网络运动中通过沟通进行组织的指标:对LIHKG论坛的分析

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Chinese Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2021-05-06 DOI:10.1080/17544750.2021.1922475
Hai Liang, Francis L. F. Lee
{"title":"线程受欢迎程度不平等作为网络运动中通过沟通进行组织的指标:对LIHKG论坛的分析","authors":"Hai Liang, Francis L. F. Lee","doi":"10.1080/17544750.2021.1922475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many contemporary networked social movements are marked by the absence of central leadership. This raises the practical question of (self-)organizing through communication. The online forum LIHKG was widely recognized as the central communication platform for supporters of the Anti-ELAB movement in Hong Kong. How can we discern whether forum users were engaging in action organization through discussion or merely having conversations? This study proposes that inequality in thread popularity could be a useful way in to tackling that question. An analysis of the contents of LIHKG between June and December of 2019 illustrates that signs of action coordination can be discerned by examining inequality in thread popularity and whether forum users’ attention increasingly concentrated on the most popular threads as the number of users increased. An examination of how attention competition and thread content combined to shape thread popularity then provides insights into the characteristics of the forum’s organizing efforts.","PeriodicalId":46367,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Communication","volume":"5 1","pages":"332 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thread popularity inequality as an indicator of organization through communication in a networked movement: an analysis of the LIHKG forum\",\"authors\":\"Hai Liang, Francis L. F. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17544750.2021.1922475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Many contemporary networked social movements are marked by the absence of central leadership. This raises the practical question of (self-)organizing through communication. The online forum LIHKG was widely recognized as the central communication platform for supporters of the Anti-ELAB movement in Hong Kong. How can we discern whether forum users were engaging in action organization through discussion or merely having conversations? This study proposes that inequality in thread popularity could be a useful way in to tackling that question. An analysis of the contents of LIHKG between June and December of 2019 illustrates that signs of action coordination can be discerned by examining inequality in thread popularity and whether forum users’ attention increasingly concentrated on the most popular threads as the number of users increased. An examination of how attention competition and thread content combined to shape thread popularity then provides insights into the characteristics of the forum’s organizing efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"332 - 354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1922475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1922475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

许多当代网络社会运动的特点是缺乏中央领导。这就提出了通过交流进行(自)组织的实际问题。网上论坛LIHKG被广泛认为是香港反elab运动支持者的主要交流平台。如何分辨论坛用户是通过讨论参与行动组织,还是仅仅是进行对话?这项研究提出,线程受欢迎程度的不平等可能是解决这个问题的有效方法。对2019年6月至12月LIHKG内容的分析表明,通过检查主题受欢迎程度的不平等,以及论坛用户的注意力是否随着用户数量的增加而越来越集中在最受欢迎的主题上,可以看出行动协调的迹象。对注意力竞争和帖子内容如何结合起来形成帖子受欢迎程度的研究,可以让我们深入了解论坛组织工作的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thread popularity inequality as an indicator of organization through communication in a networked movement: an analysis of the LIHKG forum
Abstract Many contemporary networked social movements are marked by the absence of central leadership. This raises the practical question of (self-)organizing through communication. The online forum LIHKG was widely recognized as the central communication platform for supporters of the Anti-ELAB movement in Hong Kong. How can we discern whether forum users were engaging in action organization through discussion or merely having conversations? This study proposes that inequality in thread popularity could be a useful way in to tackling that question. An analysis of the contents of LIHKG between June and December of 2019 illustrates that signs of action coordination can be discerned by examining inequality in thread popularity and whether forum users’ attention increasingly concentrated on the most popular threads as the number of users increased. An examination of how attention competition and thread content combined to shape thread popularity then provides insights into the characteristics of the forum’s organizing efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
How do corporate social responsibility perceptions facilitate advocacy behavior? The roles of organizational pride and responsible leadership Exploring freedom in mobile connectivity: a moderated mediation model linking mobile social media modes, availability pressure, and media habits Communicating LGBTQ-supportive CSR for corporate legitimacy: a cultural discourse analysis in Hong Kong Pro-liberalism vs. Nationalism: how critical opinion leaders challenge the persuasive effect of propaganda in China When politics meets dating: how moral concern, utopianism, and communication competence predict willingness to date across the political divide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1