职业干预对大学生职业决策自我效能感的影响:meta分析综述

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Australian Journal of Career Development Pub Date : 2019-08-29 DOI:10.1177/1038416219857567
Ulas-Kilic Ozlem
{"title":"职业干预对大学生职业决策自我效能感的影响:meta分析综述","authors":"Ulas-Kilic Ozlem","doi":"10.1177/1038416219857567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Career decision-making self-efficacy is one of the key concepts in the social cognitive theory; thus, programs to develop it must be informed by the best available evidence. To this end, a meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the extent to which different career interventions affect university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy. The existing literature was first reviewed, and 20 studies were included in the analysis based on a set of specific criteria. The studies selected for the meta-analysis were (a) experimental or quasi-experimental research and had a control group or a group that could be considered a comparison group, (b) reported what could be conceived as effects of career interventions on career decision-making self-efficacy, (c) recruited university students as participants, and (d) were published in English. Effect sizes were calculated using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, and the results showed that career interventions were associated with a large increase in university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy.","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"26 1","pages":"223 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of career interventions on university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review\",\"authors\":\"Ulas-Kilic Ozlem\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1038416219857567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Career decision-making self-efficacy is one of the key concepts in the social cognitive theory; thus, programs to develop it must be informed by the best available evidence. To this end, a meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the extent to which different career interventions affect university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy. The existing literature was first reviewed, and 20 studies were included in the analysis based on a set of specific criteria. The studies selected for the meta-analysis were (a) experimental or quasi-experimental research and had a control group or a group that could be considered a comparison group, (b) reported what could be conceived as effects of career interventions on career decision-making self-efficacy, (c) recruited university students as participants, and (d) were published in English. Effect sizes were calculated using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, and the results showed that career interventions were associated with a large increase in university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"223 - 233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416219857567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416219857567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

职业决策自我效能感是社会认知理论中的重要概念之一;因此,开发它的计划必须根据可获得的最佳证据。为此,本研究通过荟萃分析来确定不同职业干预对大学生职业决策自我效能感的影响程度。首先对现有文献进行了回顾,并根据一套具体标准将20项研究纳入分析。meta分析选择的研究是(a)实验或准实验研究,并有一个对照组或一个可以被视为对照组的组,(b)报告职业干预对职业决策自我效能的影响,(c)招募大学生作为参与者,(d)以英文发表。运用综合meta分析软件计算了效应量,结果表明,职业干预与大学生职业决策自我效能感水平的大幅提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of career interventions on university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review
Career decision-making self-efficacy is one of the key concepts in the social cognitive theory; thus, programs to develop it must be informed by the best available evidence. To this end, a meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the extent to which different career interventions affect university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy. The existing literature was first reviewed, and 20 studies were included in the analysis based on a set of specific criteria. The studies selected for the meta-analysis were (a) experimental or quasi-experimental research and had a control group or a group that could be considered a comparison group, (b) reported what could be conceived as effects of career interventions on career decision-making self-efficacy, (c) recruited university students as participants, and (d) were published in English. Effect sizes were calculated using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, and the results showed that career interventions were associated with a large increase in university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Toward a conceptualization of decent work in Africa: Development and cross-cultural validation of the Decent Work Triad (DWT) in Burkina Faso, Switzerland, and Togo. The relationship between living in regional, remote and rural areas and post-school outcomes: A scoping review Exploratory actions as mediators of the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes: Does exploration type matter? ‘Careering’ – toward radicalism in radical times: Links to human security and sustainable livelihoods Understanding the transition from psychology graduate to post-graduate counselling studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1