书评:创造思维文化:我们必须掌握的八种力量来真正改变我们的学校

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Food Science Education Pub Date : 2020-07-05 DOI:10.1111/1541-4329.12202
Helen Joyner
{"title":"书评:创造思维文化:我们必须掌握的八种力量来真正改变我们的学校","authors":"Helen Joyner","doi":"10.1111/1541-4329.12202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p></p><p>Creating Cultures of Thinking; The Eight Forces We Must Master to Truly Transform Our Schools. By Ron Ritchhart. 2015. Jossey-Bass: <b>ISBN</b>: 978–1118974605, 384 pages.</p><p>We often refer to students’ “critical thinking” skills as something that is important for their success in both their degree program and their future careers. Many of us are actively engaged in strengthening those skills. And many of us wonder if we could do more to enhance our students’ critical thinking skills. This is especially important as we live through a pandemic and our interactions with students have undergone a major shift from primarily in-person to primarily online and via e-mail or text. How do we encourage our students to think more deeply about the material they are learning, rather than memorize a pile of facts and promptly forget them after an exam?</p><p><i>Creating Cultures of Thinking</i> addresses the issue of students’ habit of memorizing and dumping surface information. The author, Ron Ritchhart, notes that this habit is an unfortunate side effect of the focus on standardized testing on K-12 education, where so much rides on a handful of (often multiple choice) exams. This focus, Ritchhart states, actually encourages memorization, rather than thinking. So how do we start moving away from, perhaps unconsciously, promoting memorization to pass exams and towards activities that encourage students to really get into material, ask thoughtful questions, and make connections between what they have learned and what they experience in the real world?</p><p>This shift requires a cultural change, Ritchhart writes, with eight major forces shaping the new culture. In order of discussion in the book, they are expectations, language, time, modeling, opportunities, routines, interactions, and environment. <i>Expectations</i> are what the teacher and student expect the other to do, as well as what a given effort will produce. The vocabulary used to discuss course content and actions related to the content comprise <i>language</i>, while <i>time</i> is not necessarily the course duration or class length, but the time spent on thinking. Similarly, <i>modeling</i> is not just the instructor telling students “do what I do,” but showing students how to approach thinking about information, questions, and problems. The instructor should also create <i>opportunities</i> for thinking that encourage all students to participate, regardless of ability. <i>Routines</i>, such as think-pair-share, help provide guiding structure to thinking exercises, allowing students to more quickly reach deep thinking without getting distracted by tangential topics. The <i>interaction</i> between the instructor and students is critical to thinking: who is doing more of the thinking work or more of the discussion – the instructor or the students? Promoting student thinking means that they should be doing more of the mental heavy lifting than the instructor. Finally, the learning <i>environment</i> should be conducive to thinking. It should be comfortable and inviting so students aren't distracted by an environment that is too hot, cold, loud, bright, dark, or otherwise uncomfortable. It should also put the focus on students as learners. For example, desks arranged in rows that face the teacher's desk focuses on the teacher, while desks arranged in small groups focus on the student group.</p><p>The book has a well-organized structure with plenty of examples to show how the forces are applied and discussion about why each is key to shaping a culture of thinking. Ritchhart opens the book with a chapter on the original purpose of K-12 schools (educating students to work in factory-type environments) and how the current culture of education in those schools developed. In the next eight chapters, Ritchhart discusses each of the forces of the culture of thinking. Each of these chapters opens with a definition of the force of focus, followed by a case study of its successful use and a discussion of how to use the force effectively when teaching. The chapters end with questions for the reader about their own practices in the area of the force, prompting them to think about their actions and what changes they might make to better utilize the force to promote cultures of thinking.</p><p>Although the focus of this book is promoting cultures of thinking in K-12 education, Ritchhart states that these forces are universal and therefore can be used to promote cultures of thinking in secondary education, workplaces, and in the general public. The key point is the <i>culture</i> piece of “culture of thinking”. This isn't another exercise that is handed out and completed, or another new teaching trick to tack on to an existing method. Rather, it requires a different way of thinking and acting. To actually promote thinking in the classroom, we need to be sure to give students time to do it! We also need to reward thinking, even if the effort doesn't get the student to the desired end result immediately. Our assessments and course grading structure need to reward thinking and exploration. Often, this requires a major shift in course structure. Ritchhart notes that this cultural shift can be difficult, since it is hard to give up control of the class, and to some extent, the traditional structure of coverage of material. However, the results of students thinking deeply about the material in the course, making connections to other information, and learning to ask thoughtful questions and explore topics in fine detail are highly rewarding and worth the effort.</p><p>With the general upheaval in all of education right now plus the additional stress of uncertainly of what is going to happen over the next several months to years, it can be difficult to find the mental bandwidth to make even small changes to courses, let alone major changes. But I encourage everyone to at least browse through this book and see if there is something that sparks your interest and is easy to do. The changes may be as simple as modifying instructions to an assignment or spending the last ten minutes of class discussing the topic of the day. Or even waiting more than half a second for students to answer a question. Don't worry, they will answer, if only to break the silence! These small changes over time can yield amazing results, producing students who are thoughtful, curious, and excited to keep learning. This is the kind of student we love to teach and will need even more going forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":44041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1541-4329.12202","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Creating Cultures of Thinking: The Eight Forces We Must Master to Truly Transform Our Schools\",\"authors\":\"Helen Joyner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1541-4329.12202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p></p><p>Creating Cultures of Thinking; The Eight Forces We Must Master to Truly Transform Our Schools. By Ron Ritchhart. 2015. Jossey-Bass: <b>ISBN</b>: 978–1118974605, 384 pages.</p><p>We often refer to students’ “critical thinking” skills as something that is important for their success in both their degree program and their future careers. Many of us are actively engaged in strengthening those skills. And many of us wonder if we could do more to enhance our students’ critical thinking skills. This is especially important as we live through a pandemic and our interactions with students have undergone a major shift from primarily in-person to primarily online and via e-mail or text. How do we encourage our students to think more deeply about the material they are learning, rather than memorize a pile of facts and promptly forget them after an exam?</p><p><i>Creating Cultures of Thinking</i> addresses the issue of students’ habit of memorizing and dumping surface information. The author, Ron Ritchhart, notes that this habit is an unfortunate side effect of the focus on standardized testing on K-12 education, where so much rides on a handful of (often multiple choice) exams. This focus, Ritchhart states, actually encourages memorization, rather than thinking. So how do we start moving away from, perhaps unconsciously, promoting memorization to pass exams and towards activities that encourage students to really get into material, ask thoughtful questions, and make connections between what they have learned and what they experience in the real world?</p><p>This shift requires a cultural change, Ritchhart writes, with eight major forces shaping the new culture. In order of discussion in the book, they are expectations, language, time, modeling, opportunities, routines, interactions, and environment. <i>Expectations</i> are what the teacher and student expect the other to do, as well as what a given effort will produce. The vocabulary used to discuss course content and actions related to the content comprise <i>language</i>, while <i>time</i> is not necessarily the course duration or class length, but the time spent on thinking. Similarly, <i>modeling</i> is not just the instructor telling students “do what I do,” but showing students how to approach thinking about information, questions, and problems. The instructor should also create <i>opportunities</i> for thinking that encourage all students to participate, regardless of ability. <i>Routines</i>, such as think-pair-share, help provide guiding structure to thinking exercises, allowing students to more quickly reach deep thinking without getting distracted by tangential topics. The <i>interaction</i> between the instructor and students is critical to thinking: who is doing more of the thinking work or more of the discussion – the instructor or the students? Promoting student thinking means that they should be doing more of the mental heavy lifting than the instructor. Finally, the learning <i>environment</i> should be conducive to thinking. It should be comfortable and inviting so students aren't distracted by an environment that is too hot, cold, loud, bright, dark, or otherwise uncomfortable. It should also put the focus on students as learners. For example, desks arranged in rows that face the teacher's desk focuses on the teacher, while desks arranged in small groups focus on the student group.</p><p>The book has a well-organized structure with plenty of examples to show how the forces are applied and discussion about why each is key to shaping a culture of thinking. Ritchhart opens the book with a chapter on the original purpose of K-12 schools (educating students to work in factory-type environments) and how the current culture of education in those schools developed. In the next eight chapters, Ritchhart discusses each of the forces of the culture of thinking. Each of these chapters opens with a definition of the force of focus, followed by a case study of its successful use and a discussion of how to use the force effectively when teaching. The chapters end with questions for the reader about their own practices in the area of the force, prompting them to think about their actions and what changes they might make to better utilize the force to promote cultures of thinking.</p><p>Although the focus of this book is promoting cultures of thinking in K-12 education, Ritchhart states that these forces are universal and therefore can be used to promote cultures of thinking in secondary education, workplaces, and in the general public. The key point is the <i>culture</i> piece of “culture of thinking”. This isn't another exercise that is handed out and completed, or another new teaching trick to tack on to an existing method. Rather, it requires a different way of thinking and acting. To actually promote thinking in the classroom, we need to be sure to give students time to do it! We also need to reward thinking, even if the effort doesn't get the student to the desired end result immediately. Our assessments and course grading structure need to reward thinking and exploration. Often, this requires a major shift in course structure. Ritchhart notes that this cultural shift can be difficult, since it is hard to give up control of the class, and to some extent, the traditional structure of coverage of material. However, the results of students thinking deeply about the material in the course, making connections to other information, and learning to ask thoughtful questions and explore topics in fine detail are highly rewarding and worth the effort.</p><p>With the general upheaval in all of education right now plus the additional stress of uncertainly of what is going to happen over the next several months to years, it can be difficult to find the mental bandwidth to make even small changes to courses, let alone major changes. But I encourage everyone to at least browse through this book and see if there is something that sparks your interest and is easy to do. The changes may be as simple as modifying instructions to an assignment or spending the last ten minutes of class discussing the topic of the day. Or even waiting more than half a second for students to answer a question. Don't worry, they will answer, if only to break the silence! These small changes over time can yield amazing results, producing students who are thoughtful, curious, and excited to keep learning. This is the kind of student we love to teach and will need even more going forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1541-4329.12202\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们的评估和课程评分结构需要奖励思考和探索。通常,这需要课程结构的重大转变。Ritchhart指出,这种文化转变可能是困难的,因为很难放弃对课堂的控制,在某种程度上,也很难放弃传统的材料覆盖结构。然而,学生对课程中的材料进行深入思考,与其他信息建立联系,学会提出深思熟虑的问题并详细探索主题的结果是非常值得的,值得付出努力。由于目前整个教育领域的剧变,再加上未来几个月到几年将会发生什么不确定的额外压力,很难找到对课程做出哪怕是很小的改变的精神带宽,更不用说大的改变了。但我鼓励每个人至少浏览一下这本书,看看是否有什么能激发你的兴趣,而且很容易做到。这些改变可能很简单,比如修改作业的说明,或者在课堂的最后十分钟讨论今天的话题。甚至等学生回答问题的时间超过半秒钟。别担心,他们会回答的,只要打破沉默!随着时间的推移,这些小的改变会产生惊人的结果,培养出深思熟虑、好奇、兴奋地继续学习的学生。这是我们喜欢教的学生,我们需要更多这样的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Creating Cultures of Thinking: The Eight Forces We Must Master to Truly Transform Our Schools

Creating Cultures of Thinking; The Eight Forces We Must Master to Truly Transform Our Schools. By Ron Ritchhart. 2015. Jossey-Bass: ISBN: 978–1118974605, 384 pages.

We often refer to students’ “critical thinking” skills as something that is important for their success in both their degree program and their future careers. Many of us are actively engaged in strengthening those skills. And many of us wonder if we could do more to enhance our students’ critical thinking skills. This is especially important as we live through a pandemic and our interactions with students have undergone a major shift from primarily in-person to primarily online and via e-mail or text. How do we encourage our students to think more deeply about the material they are learning, rather than memorize a pile of facts and promptly forget them after an exam?

Creating Cultures of Thinking addresses the issue of students’ habit of memorizing and dumping surface information. The author, Ron Ritchhart, notes that this habit is an unfortunate side effect of the focus on standardized testing on K-12 education, where so much rides on a handful of (often multiple choice) exams. This focus, Ritchhart states, actually encourages memorization, rather than thinking. So how do we start moving away from, perhaps unconsciously, promoting memorization to pass exams and towards activities that encourage students to really get into material, ask thoughtful questions, and make connections between what they have learned and what they experience in the real world?

This shift requires a cultural change, Ritchhart writes, with eight major forces shaping the new culture. In order of discussion in the book, they are expectations, language, time, modeling, opportunities, routines, interactions, and environment. Expectations are what the teacher and student expect the other to do, as well as what a given effort will produce. The vocabulary used to discuss course content and actions related to the content comprise language, while time is not necessarily the course duration or class length, but the time spent on thinking. Similarly, modeling is not just the instructor telling students “do what I do,” but showing students how to approach thinking about information, questions, and problems. The instructor should also create opportunities for thinking that encourage all students to participate, regardless of ability. Routines, such as think-pair-share, help provide guiding structure to thinking exercises, allowing students to more quickly reach deep thinking without getting distracted by tangential topics. The interaction between the instructor and students is critical to thinking: who is doing more of the thinking work or more of the discussion – the instructor or the students? Promoting student thinking means that they should be doing more of the mental heavy lifting than the instructor. Finally, the learning environment should be conducive to thinking. It should be comfortable and inviting so students aren't distracted by an environment that is too hot, cold, loud, bright, dark, or otherwise uncomfortable. It should also put the focus on students as learners. For example, desks arranged in rows that face the teacher's desk focuses on the teacher, while desks arranged in small groups focus on the student group.

The book has a well-organized structure with plenty of examples to show how the forces are applied and discussion about why each is key to shaping a culture of thinking. Ritchhart opens the book with a chapter on the original purpose of K-12 schools (educating students to work in factory-type environments) and how the current culture of education in those schools developed. In the next eight chapters, Ritchhart discusses each of the forces of the culture of thinking. Each of these chapters opens with a definition of the force of focus, followed by a case study of its successful use and a discussion of how to use the force effectively when teaching. The chapters end with questions for the reader about their own practices in the area of the force, prompting them to think about their actions and what changes they might make to better utilize the force to promote cultures of thinking.

Although the focus of this book is promoting cultures of thinking in K-12 education, Ritchhart states that these forces are universal and therefore can be used to promote cultures of thinking in secondary education, workplaces, and in the general public. The key point is the culture piece of “culture of thinking”. This isn't another exercise that is handed out and completed, or another new teaching trick to tack on to an existing method. Rather, it requires a different way of thinking and acting. To actually promote thinking in the classroom, we need to be sure to give students time to do it! We also need to reward thinking, even if the effort doesn't get the student to the desired end result immediately. Our assessments and course grading structure need to reward thinking and exploration. Often, this requires a major shift in course structure. Ritchhart notes that this cultural shift can be difficult, since it is hard to give up control of the class, and to some extent, the traditional structure of coverage of material. However, the results of students thinking deeply about the material in the course, making connections to other information, and learning to ask thoughtful questions and explore topics in fine detail are highly rewarding and worth the effort.

With the general upheaval in all of education right now plus the additional stress of uncertainly of what is going to happen over the next several months to years, it can be difficult to find the mental bandwidth to make even small changes to courses, let alone major changes. But I encourage everyone to at least browse through this book and see if there is something that sparks your interest and is easy to do. The changes may be as simple as modifying instructions to an assignment or spending the last ten minutes of class discussing the topic of the day. Or even waiting more than half a second for students to answer a question. Don't worry, they will answer, if only to break the silence! These small changes over time can yield amazing results, producing students who are thoughtful, curious, and excited to keep learning. This is the kind of student we love to teach and will need even more going forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science Education
Journal of Food Science Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) publishes the Journal of Food Science Education (JFSE) to serve the interest of its members in the field of food science education at all levels. The journal is aimed at all those committed to the improvement of food science education, including primary, secondary, undergraduate and graduate, continuing, and workplace education. It serves as an international forum for scholarly and innovative development in all aspects of food science education for "teachers" (individuals who facilitate, mentor, or instruct) and "students" (individuals who are the focus of learning efforts).
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Flipped laboratory classes: Student performance and perceptions in undergraduate food science and technology Next steps Student perspectives of various learning approaches used in an undergraduate food science and technology subject Grab the opportunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1