{"title":"民主与民粹主义","authors":"J. Braun","doi":"10.1177/08969205231164153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jan-Werner Müller is a political philosopher born and trained in Germany, as well as in England and at Princeton where he now teaches as Roger Williams Straus Professor of Social Sciences at Princeton University and is also a fellow at the Berlin Institute of Advanced Study. The emphasis of this latest book by him is that democracy depends not only on maintaining liberty and equality but also on dealing with uncertainty. His previous book was What Is Populism? (2016) where he does not really emphasize, though he seems to recognize, that populism can be the expression of rational grievances of an aroused population, reacting against the rise of elites increasingly unaccountable in practice if not necessarily in theory. Peter Mair (2013), the late great Irish political scientist in Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, became known for his comments on this very subject, of politicians who think more like civil servants concerned with keeping their jobs long enough to retire with nice pensions than in being leaders of social movements. Müller emphasizes more the unreasonableness of populist movements, their tendency to think of themselves as ‘the real people’, and therefore their tendency to scapegoat those they consider to be social outsiders, particularly immigrants and ethnic minorities, and therefore their tendency to ignore other sources of social problems requiring other solutions. As for such solutions, keeping out or even expelling these ‘outsiders’ is according to many economists a short-sighted solution to short-term economic problems that can be dealt with by economic growth, perhaps by using these same immigrants as cheap labor or by exporting certain","PeriodicalId":47686,"journal":{"name":"Critical Sociology","volume":"64 1","pages":"885 - 892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democracy and Populism\",\"authors\":\"J. Braun\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08969205231164153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jan-Werner Müller is a political philosopher born and trained in Germany, as well as in England and at Princeton where he now teaches as Roger Williams Straus Professor of Social Sciences at Princeton University and is also a fellow at the Berlin Institute of Advanced Study. The emphasis of this latest book by him is that democracy depends not only on maintaining liberty and equality but also on dealing with uncertainty. His previous book was What Is Populism? (2016) where he does not really emphasize, though he seems to recognize, that populism can be the expression of rational grievances of an aroused population, reacting against the rise of elites increasingly unaccountable in practice if not necessarily in theory. Peter Mair (2013), the late great Irish political scientist in Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, became known for his comments on this very subject, of politicians who think more like civil servants concerned with keeping their jobs long enough to retire with nice pensions than in being leaders of social movements. Müller emphasizes more the unreasonableness of populist movements, their tendency to think of themselves as ‘the real people’, and therefore their tendency to scapegoat those they consider to be social outsiders, particularly immigrants and ethnic minorities, and therefore their tendency to ignore other sources of social problems requiring other solutions. As for such solutions, keeping out or even expelling these ‘outsiders’ is according to many economists a short-sighted solution to short-term economic problems that can be dealt with by economic growth, perhaps by using these same immigrants as cheap labor or by exporting certain\",\"PeriodicalId\":47686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Sociology\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"885 - 892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231164153\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231164153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Jan-Werner m ller是一位政治哲学家,在德国、英国和普林斯顿出生并接受教育,他现在在普林斯顿大学担任罗杰·威廉姆斯·施特劳斯社会科学教授,同时也是柏林高等研究院的研究员。他的新作强调,民主主义不仅要维持自由和平等,还要应对不确定性。他的前一本书是《什么是民粹主义?》(2016),虽然他似乎认识到,但他并没有真正强调民粹主义可以是被唤醒的人群的理性不满的表达,对精英的崛起做出反应,即使在理论上不一定是在实践中也越来越不负责任。已故伟大的爱尔兰政治学家彼得·梅尔(Peter maair, 2013)在《统治虚空:西方民主的空心化》(Ruling the Void: the hollow of Western Democracy)一书中,以他对这一主题的评论而闻名,他认为政治家更像是公务员,他们关心的是保住自己的工作,直到退休时拿着丰厚的养老金,而不是成为社会运动的领导者。m勒更强调民粹主义运动的不合理性,他们倾向于认为自己是“真正的人民”,因此他们倾向于把那些他们认为是社会局外人的人当作替罪羊,特别是移民和少数民族,因此他们倾向于忽视需要其他解决方案的社会问题的其他根源。至于这些解决方案,根据许多经济学家的说法,拒绝甚至驱逐这些“外来者”是解决短期经济问题的一种短视的解决方案,可以通过经济增长来解决,也许可以通过将这些移民作为廉价劳动力或出口某些产品来解决
Jan-Werner Müller is a political philosopher born and trained in Germany, as well as in England and at Princeton where he now teaches as Roger Williams Straus Professor of Social Sciences at Princeton University and is also a fellow at the Berlin Institute of Advanced Study. The emphasis of this latest book by him is that democracy depends not only on maintaining liberty and equality but also on dealing with uncertainty. His previous book was What Is Populism? (2016) where he does not really emphasize, though he seems to recognize, that populism can be the expression of rational grievances of an aroused population, reacting against the rise of elites increasingly unaccountable in practice if not necessarily in theory. Peter Mair (2013), the late great Irish political scientist in Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, became known for his comments on this very subject, of politicians who think more like civil servants concerned with keeping their jobs long enough to retire with nice pensions than in being leaders of social movements. Müller emphasizes more the unreasonableness of populist movements, their tendency to think of themselves as ‘the real people’, and therefore their tendency to scapegoat those they consider to be social outsiders, particularly immigrants and ethnic minorities, and therefore their tendency to ignore other sources of social problems requiring other solutions. As for such solutions, keeping out or even expelling these ‘outsiders’ is according to many economists a short-sighted solution to short-term economic problems that can be dealt with by economic growth, perhaps by using these same immigrants as cheap labor or by exporting certain
期刊介绍:
Critical Sociology is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research. Originally appearing as The Insurgent Sociologist, it grew out of the tumultuous times of the late 1960s and was a by-product of the "Sociology Liberation Movement" which erupted at the 1969 meetings of the American Sociological Association. At first publishing work mainly within the broadest boundaries of the Marxist tradition, over the past decade the journal has been home to articles informed by post-modern, feminist, cultural and other perspectives that critically evaluate the workings of the capitalist system and its impact on the world.