{"title":"注射富血小板纤维蛋白和微针-一种非手术方法牙龈增大:一项随机对照临床试验","authors":"S. Soundarajan, Sankari Malaippan","doi":"10.1177/23202068231157997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining microneedling (MN) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) administration with i-PRF alone in augmenting the thickness of gingiva to manage thin periodontal phenotype. Methodology: The clinical trial involved 36 patients who were diagnosed with thin periodontal phenotype. They were randomized under two groups: MN + i-PRF versus i-PRF alone, carried out as a split-mouth trial. One quadrant was treated only with i-PRF delivery through the gingival sulcus, while the contralateral side was treated with MN and i-PRF in 3 sessions at 10-day intervals. The primary parameter measured was the thickness of the gingiva, at baseline and 3 months following therapy. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Wilcoxon’s signed ranking test for inter-group and intra-group analysis, respectively. Results: The study results showed a significantly greater increase in gingival thickness (GT) in sites where both MN and i-PRF injection was done, compared to i-PRF alone, with a p value of .04. Conclusion: Both treatment modalities showed improvement in GT, being a minimally invasive alternative for mucogingival surgery. Adjunctive MN was found to be more beneficial than i-PRF alone. However, further research should be carried out to address the drawbacks of the study and for a better understanding of this novel approach.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"29 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Microneedling—A Non-Surgical Approach for Gingival Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"S. Soundarajan, Sankari Malaippan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23202068231157997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining microneedling (MN) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) administration with i-PRF alone in augmenting the thickness of gingiva to manage thin periodontal phenotype. Methodology: The clinical trial involved 36 patients who were diagnosed with thin periodontal phenotype. They were randomized under two groups: MN + i-PRF versus i-PRF alone, carried out as a split-mouth trial. One quadrant was treated only with i-PRF delivery through the gingival sulcus, while the contralateral side was treated with MN and i-PRF in 3 sessions at 10-day intervals. The primary parameter measured was the thickness of the gingiva, at baseline and 3 months following therapy. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Wilcoxon’s signed ranking test for inter-group and intra-group analysis, respectively. Results: The study results showed a significantly greater increase in gingival thickness (GT) in sites where both MN and i-PRF injection was done, compared to i-PRF alone, with a p value of .04. Conclusion: Both treatment modalities showed improvement in GT, being a minimally invasive alternative for mucogingival surgery. Adjunctive MN was found to be more beneficial than i-PRF alone. However, further research should be carried out to address the drawbacks of the study and for a better understanding of this novel approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Oral Research\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068231157997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068231157997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Microneedling—A Non-Surgical Approach for Gingival Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Aim: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining microneedling (MN) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) administration with i-PRF alone in augmenting the thickness of gingiva to manage thin periodontal phenotype. Methodology: The clinical trial involved 36 patients who were diagnosed with thin periodontal phenotype. They were randomized under two groups: MN + i-PRF versus i-PRF alone, carried out as a split-mouth trial. One quadrant was treated only with i-PRF delivery through the gingival sulcus, while the contralateral side was treated with MN and i-PRF in 3 sessions at 10-day intervals. The primary parameter measured was the thickness of the gingiva, at baseline and 3 months following therapy. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Wilcoxon’s signed ranking test for inter-group and intra-group analysis, respectively. Results: The study results showed a significantly greater increase in gingival thickness (GT) in sites where both MN and i-PRF injection was done, compared to i-PRF alone, with a p value of .04. Conclusion: Both treatment modalities showed improvement in GT, being a minimally invasive alternative for mucogingival surgery. Adjunctive MN was found to be more beneficial than i-PRF alone. However, further research should be carried out to address the drawbacks of the study and for a better understanding of this novel approach.