现代希腊思想和史学中的拜占庭转折,1767-1874

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Historical Review-La Revue Historique Pub Date : 2015-12-30 DOI:10.12681/HR.8805
Dean Kostantaras
{"title":"现代希腊思想和史学中的拜占庭转折,1767-1874","authors":"Dean Kostantaras","doi":"10.12681/HR.8805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines representations of Byzantium in Modern Greek historical thought, from the first translation (1767) of the Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae to the publication of Konstantinos Paparrigopoulos’ complete Ἱστορία τοῦ Ἑλληνικού Ἔθνους [History of the Greek nation (1860-1874)]. In doing so, it reassesses conventions, especially prevalent in English-language works, regarding the range and complexity of endeavors in this vein. Developments in European thought are used throughout as a vantage point, as they represent a contingency of great importance for any assessment of Greek attitudes toward the past. However, these influences did not always point in one direction; a factor which, in tandem with local generational and ideological divisions, helps to explain the diverse perspectives on Byzantium in Greek works from the period under review.","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":"131 11 1","pages":"163-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Byzantine Turns in Modern Greek Thought and Historiography, 1767-1874\",\"authors\":\"Dean Kostantaras\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/HR.8805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines representations of Byzantium in Modern Greek historical thought, from the first translation (1767) of the Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae to the publication of Konstantinos Paparrigopoulos’ complete Ἱστορία τοῦ Ἑλληνικού Ἔθνους [History of the Greek nation (1860-1874)]. In doing so, it reassesses conventions, especially prevalent in English-language works, regarding the range and complexity of endeavors in this vein. Developments in European thought are used throughout as a vantage point, as they represent a contingency of great importance for any assessment of Greek attitudes toward the past. However, these influences did not always point in one direction; a factor which, in tandem with local generational and ideological divisions, helps to explain the diverse perspectives on Byzantium in Greek works from the period under review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Review-La Revue Historique\",\"volume\":\"131 11 1\",\"pages\":\"163-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Review-La Revue Historique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.8805\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.8805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了拜占庭在现代希腊历史思想中的表现,从《拜占庭历史手稿大全》(Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae)的第一个译本(1767年)到Konstantinos Paparrigopoulos的完整著作Ἱστο α το οἙλληνικο οἜθ ο ο ς[希腊民族历史(1860-1874年)]的出版。在这样做的过程中,它重新评估了传统,特别是在英语作品中普遍存在的,关于这方面努力的范围和复杂性。欧洲思想的发展在整个过程中都被用作一个有利位置,因为它们代表了对任何评估希腊对过去的态度都非常重要的偶然性。然而,这些影响并不总是指向一个方向;这一因素与当地的代际和意识形态分歧相结合,有助于解释从所审查的时期希腊作品中对拜占庭的不同看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Byzantine Turns in Modern Greek Thought and Historiography, 1767-1874
This article examines representations of Byzantium in Modern Greek historical thought, from the first translation (1767) of the Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae to the publication of Konstantinos Paparrigopoulos’ complete Ἱστορία τοῦ Ἑλληνικού Ἔθνους [History of the Greek nation (1860-1874)]. In doing so, it reassesses conventions, especially prevalent in English-language works, regarding the range and complexity of endeavors in this vein. Developments in European thought are used throughout as a vantage point, as they represent a contingency of great importance for any assessment of Greek attitudes toward the past. However, these influences did not always point in one direction; a factor which, in tandem with local generational and ideological divisions, helps to explain the diverse perspectives on Byzantium in Greek works from the period under review.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diego Venturino (éd.), OEuvres complètes de Voltaire An Optical Revolution and an “Unfortunate” Exhibition: “Van Eyck: An Optical Revolution,” Museum of Fine Arts, Ghent Foreword to C. Th. Dimaras Annual Lecture, 2019 Olga Katsiardi-Hering, Anastasia Papadia-Lala, Katerina Nikolaou and Vangelis Karamanolakis (eds.), Έλλην, Ρωμηός, Γραικός: Συλλογικοί προσδιορισμοί και ταυτότητες [Hellene, Romios, Greek: Collective designations and identities] Introduction: Modern Greek theatre on the threshhold of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1