金融科技在欧洲:承诺与威胁

Chikako Baba, C. Batog, Enrique Flores, B. Gracia, Izabela Karpowicz, Piotr Kopyrski, J. Roaf, A. Shabunina, R. V. Elkan, X. Xu
{"title":"金融科技在欧洲:承诺与威胁","authors":"Chikako Baba, C. Batog, Enrique Flores, B. Gracia, Izabela Karpowicz, Piotr Kopyrski, J. Roaf, A. Shabunina, R. V. Elkan, X. Xu","doi":"10.5089/9781513561165.001.A001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Europe’s high pre-existing level of financial development can partly account for the relatively smaller reach of fintech payment and lending activities compared to some other regions. But fintech activity is growing rapidly. Digital payment schemes are expanding within countries, although cross-border and pan-euro area instruments are not yet widespread, notwithstanding important enabling EU level regulation and the establishment of instant payments by the ECB. Automated lending models are developing but remain limited mainly to unsecured consumer lending. While start-ups are pursuing platform-based approaches under minimal regulation, there is a clear trend for fintech companies to acquire balance sheets and, relatedly, banking licenses as they expand. Meanwhile, competition is pushing many traditional banks to adopt fintech instruments, either in-house or by acquisition, thereby causing them to increasingly resemble balanced sheet-based fintech companies. These developments could improve the efficiency and reach of financial intermediation while also adding to profitability pressures for some banks. Although the COVID-19 pandemic could call into question the viability of platform-based lending fintechs funding models given that investors could face much higher delinquencies, it may also offer growth opportunities to those fintechs that are positioned to take advantage of the ongoing structural shift in demand toward virtual finance.","PeriodicalId":14326,"journal":{"name":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fintech in Europe: Promises and Threats\",\"authors\":\"Chikako Baba, C. Batog, Enrique Flores, B. Gracia, Izabela Karpowicz, Piotr Kopyrski, J. Roaf, A. Shabunina, R. V. Elkan, X. Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.5089/9781513561165.001.A001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Europe’s high pre-existing level of financial development can partly account for the relatively smaller reach of fintech payment and lending activities compared to some other regions. But fintech activity is growing rapidly. Digital payment schemes are expanding within countries, although cross-border and pan-euro area instruments are not yet widespread, notwithstanding important enabling EU level regulation and the establishment of instant payments by the ECB. Automated lending models are developing but remain limited mainly to unsecured consumer lending. While start-ups are pursuing platform-based approaches under minimal regulation, there is a clear trend for fintech companies to acquire balance sheets and, relatedly, banking licenses as they expand. Meanwhile, competition is pushing many traditional banks to adopt fintech instruments, either in-house or by acquisition, thereby causing them to increasingly resemble balanced sheet-based fintech companies. These developments could improve the efficiency and reach of financial intermediation while also adding to profitability pressures for some banks. Although the COVID-19 pandemic could call into question the viability of platform-based lending fintechs funding models given that investors could face much higher delinquencies, it may also offer growth opportunities to those fintechs that are positioned to take advantage of the ongoing structural shift in demand toward virtual finance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561165.001.A001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561165.001.A001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

与其他一些地区相比,欧洲原有的高金融发展水平可以部分解释金融科技支付和贷款活动相对较小的影响。但金融科技活动正在迅速增长。数字支付方案正在各国内部扩张,尽管跨境和泛欧元区工具尚未普及,尽管欧盟层面的重要监管和欧洲央行建立了即时支付。自动化贷款模式正在发展,但仍主要局限于无担保消费贷款。虽然初创企业在监管最少的情况下追求基于平台的方法,但金融科技公司在扩张过程中收购资产负债表以及相关的银行牌照的趋势很明显。与此同时,竞争正在推动许多传统银行采用金融科技工具,无论是在内部还是通过收购,从而使它们越来越像基于资产负债表的金融科技公司。这些发展可能会提高金融中介的效率和覆盖面,同时也会增加一些银行的盈利压力。尽管鉴于投资者可能面临更高的违约率,COVID-19大流行可能会质疑基于平台的借贷金融科技融资模式的可行性,但它也可能为那些有能力利用当前对虚拟金融需求的结构性转变的金融科技公司提供增长机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fintech in Europe: Promises and Threats
Europe’s high pre-existing level of financial development can partly account for the relatively smaller reach of fintech payment and lending activities compared to some other regions. But fintech activity is growing rapidly. Digital payment schemes are expanding within countries, although cross-border and pan-euro area instruments are not yet widespread, notwithstanding important enabling EU level regulation and the establishment of instant payments by the ECB. Automated lending models are developing but remain limited mainly to unsecured consumer lending. While start-ups are pursuing platform-based approaches under minimal regulation, there is a clear trend for fintech companies to acquire balance sheets and, relatedly, banking licenses as they expand. Meanwhile, competition is pushing many traditional banks to adopt fintech instruments, either in-house or by acquisition, thereby causing them to increasingly resemble balanced sheet-based fintech companies. These developments could improve the efficiency and reach of financial intermediation while also adding to profitability pressures for some banks. Although the COVID-19 pandemic could call into question the viability of platform-based lending fintechs funding models given that investors could face much higher delinquencies, it may also offer growth opportunities to those fintechs that are positioned to take advantage of the ongoing structural shift in demand toward virtual finance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing the United States' Domestic and International Climate Mitigation Goals: A Supportive Fiscal Policy Approach How Does Profit Shifting Affect the Balance of Payments? A Time to Build: Does Ta Matter for Revenue Mobilization? Regional Disparities, Growth, and Inclusiveness The Impact of r-g on the Euro-Area Government Spending Multiplier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1