PACE状态更新

M. Zimring, Ian M. Hoffman, Merrian C. Fuller
{"title":"PACE状态更新","authors":"M. Zimring, Ian M. Hoffman, Merrian C. Fuller","doi":"10.2172/1016372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AUGUST 11, 2010 PACE Status Update By Mark Zimring, Ian Hoffman and Merrian Fuller The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) regulates Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks (the government-sponsored enterprises – GSEs). On July 6, 2010, FHFA and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) concluded that Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) 1 programs “present significant safety and soundness concerns” to the housing finance industry. 2 This statement came after a year of discussions with state and federal agencies in which PACE, a novel mechanism for financing energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements, has gone from receiving support from the White House, 3 canonization as one of Scientific American’s “World Changing Ideas” 4 and legislative adoption in 24 states to questionable relevance, at least in the residential sector. Whether PACE resumes its expansion as an innovative tool for financing energy efficiency and clean generation depends on outcomes in each of the three branches of government – discussions on a PACE pilot phase among federal agencies, litigation in federal court, and legislation in Congress – all highly uncertain. This policy brief addresses the practical impacts of these possible outcomes on existing and emerging PACE programs across the United States and potential paths forward. The work described in this Policy Brief was funded by the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California. Similar programs carry a variety of names: Voluntary Environmental Improvement Bond (VEIB) programs; Energy Loan Tax Assessment Programs (ELTAPs); and Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Contracting Assessment District (E- CAD). http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/15884/PACESTMT7610.pdf The White House’s October 2009 Recovery Through Retrofit Report is available here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/Recovery_Through_Retrofit_Final_Report.pdf http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=world-changing-ideas&page=2","PeriodicalId":17982,"journal":{"name":"Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PACE Status Update\",\"authors\":\"M. Zimring, Ian M. Hoffman, Merrian C. Fuller\",\"doi\":\"10.2172/1016372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AUGUST 11, 2010 PACE Status Update By Mark Zimring, Ian Hoffman and Merrian Fuller The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) regulates Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks (the government-sponsored enterprises – GSEs). On July 6, 2010, FHFA and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) concluded that Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) 1 programs “present significant safety and soundness concerns” to the housing finance industry. 2 This statement came after a year of discussions with state and federal agencies in which PACE, a novel mechanism for financing energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements, has gone from receiving support from the White House, 3 canonization as one of Scientific American’s “World Changing Ideas” 4 and legislative adoption in 24 states to questionable relevance, at least in the residential sector. Whether PACE resumes its expansion as an innovative tool for financing energy efficiency and clean generation depends on outcomes in each of the three branches of government – discussions on a PACE pilot phase among federal agencies, litigation in federal court, and legislation in Congress – all highly uncertain. This policy brief addresses the practical impacts of these possible outcomes on existing and emerging PACE programs across the United States and potential paths forward. The work described in this Policy Brief was funded by the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California. Similar programs carry a variety of names: Voluntary Environmental Improvement Bond (VEIB) programs; Energy Loan Tax Assessment Programs (ELTAPs); and Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Contracting Assessment District (E- CAD). http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/15884/PACESTMT7610.pdf The White House’s October 2009 Recovery Through Retrofit Report is available here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/Recovery_Through_Retrofit_Final_Report.pdf http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=world-changing-ideas&page=2\",\"PeriodicalId\":17982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2172/1016372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2172/1016372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

联邦住房金融局(FHFA)监管房利美、房地美和12家联邦住房贷款银行(政府支持的企业——GSEs)。2010年7月6日,联邦住房金融局和货币监理署(OCC)得出结论,财产评估清洁能源(PACE) 1项目对住房金融业“存在重大的安全和稳健问题”。这一声明是在与州和联邦机构进行了一年的讨论之后发表的,在讨论中,PACE(一种为能源效率和可再生能源改进提供资金的新机制)从得到白宫的支持,被《科学美国人》列为“改变世界的想法”之一,并在24个州获得立法通过,但至少在住宅领域,它的相关性受到质疑。PACE是否会作为一种创新的能源效率和清洁发电融资工具恢复其扩张,取决于政府三个部门的结果——联邦机构之间关于PACE试点阶段的讨论、联邦法院的诉讼和国会的立法——所有这些都高度不确定。本政策简报阐述了这些可能结果对美国现有和新兴PACE项目的实际影响,以及潜在的前进道路。本政策简报中描述的工作是由能源部能源效率和可再生能源、防候化和政府间项目办公室根据合同编号资助的。DE-AC02-05CH11231。免责声明本文件是作为美国政府赞助的工作的说明而编写的。虽然本文件被认为包含正确的信息,但美国政府及其任何机构、加州大学校董会及其任何雇员均不对所披露的任何信息、设备、产品或过程的准确性、完整性或有用性作出任何明示或暗示的保证,或承担任何法律责任,或表示其使用不会侵犯私人拥有的权利。此处提及任何特定商业产品、工艺或服务的商品名称、商标、制造商或其他方式,并不一定构成或暗示其认可、推荐或受到美国政府或其任何机构或加州大学董事会的青睐。作者在此表达的观点和意见并不一定陈述或反映美国政府或其任何机构或加州大学董事会的观点和意见。类似的项目有各种各样的名称:自愿环境改善债券(VEIB)项目;能源贷款税收评估计划(ELTAPs);及能源效益/可再生能源合约评估区(E- CAD)。http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/15884/PACESTMT7610.pdf白宫2009年10月的改造复苏报告可在这里查阅:http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/Recovery_Through_Retrofit_Final_Report.pdf http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=world-changing-ideas&page=2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PACE Status Update
AUGUST 11, 2010 PACE Status Update By Mark Zimring, Ian Hoffman and Merrian Fuller The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) regulates Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks (the government-sponsored enterprises – GSEs). On July 6, 2010, FHFA and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) concluded that Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) 1 programs “present significant safety and soundness concerns” to the housing finance industry. 2 This statement came after a year of discussions with state and federal agencies in which PACE, a novel mechanism for financing energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements, has gone from receiving support from the White House, 3 canonization as one of Scientific American’s “World Changing Ideas” 4 and legislative adoption in 24 states to questionable relevance, at least in the residential sector. Whether PACE resumes its expansion as an innovative tool for financing energy efficiency and clean generation depends on outcomes in each of the three branches of government – discussions on a PACE pilot phase among federal agencies, litigation in federal court, and legislation in Congress – all highly uncertain. This policy brief addresses the practical impacts of these possible outcomes on existing and emerging PACE programs across the United States and potential paths forward. The work described in this Policy Brief was funded by the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California. Similar programs carry a variety of names: Voluntary Environmental Improvement Bond (VEIB) programs; Energy Loan Tax Assessment Programs (ELTAPs); and Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Contracting Assessment District (E- CAD). http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/15884/PACESTMT7610.pdf The White House’s October 2009 Recovery Through Retrofit Report is available here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/Recovery_Through_Retrofit_Final_Report.pdf http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=world-changing-ideas&page=2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Cost and Safety with Cathode-Healing and Whole Battery Deactivation SUMMARY OF RESERVOIR ENGINEERING DATA: WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL FIELD, NEW ZEALAND NUCLEAR MATERIALS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORTS FOR 1979 Using Cool Roofs to Reduce Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Urban Heat-island Effects: Findings from an India Experiment User's Manual for BEST-Dairy: Benchmarking and Energy/water-Saving Tool (BEST) for the Dairy Processing Industry (Version 1.2)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1