初学成人二语学习者对形态句法违反的敏感性:一项自定节奏阅读研究

Natasha Tokowicz, Tessa C. Warren
{"title":"初学成人二语学习者对形态句法违反的敏感性:一项自定节奏阅读研究","authors":"Natasha Tokowicz, Tessa C. Warren","doi":"10.1080/09541440903325178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated beginning adult second language (L2) learners' sensitivity to L2 morphosyntactic violations as a function of cross-language similarity. Online sensitivity was indexed by self-paced reading times at: (1) the critical word at which the violation could first be detected, (2) the post-critical word, and (3) the sentence-final word. In conditions in which morphosyntactic marking systems were similar or different in L1 and L2, reading times on the critical word were slower when it cued a violation than when it did not; however, this sensitivity was not apparent in a construction unique to L2. Slower reading times to violations spilled over onto the post-critical word. Cross-language similarity also influenced sentence-final word reading times. Despite this online sensitivity, post-sentence grammaticality judgements were generally poor. However, these judgements were influenced by morphosyntactic markings on words after the critical word, suggesting that learners can make use of this information.","PeriodicalId":88321,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","volume":"29 1","pages":"1092 - 1106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beginning adult L2 learners' sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations: A self-paced reading study\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Tokowicz, Tessa C. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09541440903325178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated beginning adult second language (L2) learners' sensitivity to L2 morphosyntactic violations as a function of cross-language similarity. Online sensitivity was indexed by self-paced reading times at: (1) the critical word at which the violation could first be detected, (2) the post-critical word, and (3) the sentence-final word. In conditions in which morphosyntactic marking systems were similar or different in L1 and L2, reading times on the critical word were slower when it cued a violation than when it did not; however, this sensitivity was not apparent in a construction unique to L2. Slower reading times to violations spilled over onto the post-critical word. Cross-language similarity also influenced sentence-final word reading times. Despite this online sensitivity, post-sentence grammaticality judgements were generally poor. However, these judgements were influenced by morphosyntactic markings on words after the critical word, suggesting that learners can make use of this information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of cognitive psychology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"1092 - 1106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of cognitive psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903325178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903325178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

本研究调查了初学成人第二语言(L2)学习者对第二语言形态句法违规的敏感性与跨语言相似性的关系。在线敏感度是通过自定阅读时间来索引的:(1)第一次发现违规的关键字,(2)后关键字,(3)句子的最后一个词。在L1和L2的形态句法标记系统相似或不同的条件下,当关键字提示违规时,阅读速度比不提示违规时慢;然而,这种敏感性在L2独有的结构中并不明显。较慢的阅读时间会影响到后批评词。跨语言相似性也会影响句子尾词的阅读时间。尽管网上有这种敏感性,但人们对句后语法的判断通常很差。然而,这些判断受到关键词之后单词的形态句法标记的影响,这表明学习者可以利用这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beginning adult L2 learners' sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations: A self-paced reading study
This study investigated beginning adult second language (L2) learners' sensitivity to L2 morphosyntactic violations as a function of cross-language similarity. Online sensitivity was indexed by self-paced reading times at: (1) the critical word at which the violation could first be detected, (2) the post-critical word, and (3) the sentence-final word. In conditions in which morphosyntactic marking systems were similar or different in L1 and L2, reading times on the critical word were slower when it cued a violation than when it did not; however, this sensitivity was not apparent in a construction unique to L2. Slower reading times to violations spilled over onto the post-critical word. Cross-language similarity also influenced sentence-final word reading times. Despite this online sensitivity, post-sentence grammaticality judgements were generally poor. However, these judgements were influenced by morphosyntactic markings on words after the critical word, suggesting that learners can make use of this information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What are the Bayesian constraints in the Bayesian reader? Reply to Norris and Kinoshita (2010) Explanation versus accommodation: Reply to Bowers (2010) Assessing changes in performance and monitoring processes in individual and collaborative tests according to students' metacognitive skills The contribution of familiarity to within- and between-domain associative recognition memory: Use of a modified remember/know procedure Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1