难以捉摸的天命:东周时期天明的变化

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES T'oung Pao Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1163/15685322-10901001
Xinhui Luo, Y. Pines
{"title":"难以捉摸的天命:东周时期天明的变化","authors":"Xinhui Luo, Y. Pines","doi":"10.1163/15685322-10901001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The concept of tianming 天命 (Mandate of Heaven/Heaven’s Mandate) is often viewed as a foundational principle of Chinese political culture. However, as paleographic and textual evidence marshalled in our article suggests, during the formative age of this culture—the Eastern Zhou period (eighth through third centuries BCE)—this concept underwent profound changes and lost much of its original appeal. With the de facto collapse of Zhou authority in 771 BCE, tianming became dissociated from the idea of singular and universal rule. Henceforth it could refer to a regional lord’s hegemonic power, or the right to rule one’s state, or just to an opportune moment or individual destiny. The very idea of Heaven as an activist deity that guaranteed political order was questioned by many, further eroding the appeal of tianming. However, the Western Zhou notion of tianming did not perish altogether. It remained “an ideology in reserve,” part of a broad toolkit of political ideas, to be rediscovered and redeployed by Han dynasty imperial ideologues.","PeriodicalId":23193,"journal":{"name":"T'oung Pao","volume":"449 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Elusive Mandate of Heaven: Changing Views of Tianming 天命 in the Eastern Zhou Period\",\"authors\":\"Xinhui Luo, Y. Pines\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685322-10901001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The concept of tianming 天命 (Mandate of Heaven/Heaven’s Mandate) is often viewed as a foundational principle of Chinese political culture. However, as paleographic and textual evidence marshalled in our article suggests, during the formative age of this culture—the Eastern Zhou period (eighth through third centuries BCE)—this concept underwent profound changes and lost much of its original appeal. With the de facto collapse of Zhou authority in 771 BCE, tianming became dissociated from the idea of singular and universal rule. Henceforth it could refer to a regional lord’s hegemonic power, or the right to rule one’s state, or just to an opportune moment or individual destiny. The very idea of Heaven as an activist deity that guaranteed political order was questioned by many, further eroding the appeal of tianming. However, the Western Zhou notion of tianming did not perish altogether. It remained “an ideology in reserve,” part of a broad toolkit of political ideas, to be rediscovered and redeployed by Han dynasty imperial ideologues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"T'oung Pao\",\"volume\":\"449 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"T'oung Pao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10901001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"T'oung Pao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10901001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天命的概念通常被视为中国政治文化的基本原则。然而,正如我们文章中整理的古文字证据所表明的那样,在这种文化的形成时期——东周时期(公元前8世纪至公元前3世纪)——这一概念经历了深刻的变化,失去了许多原有的吸引力。随着公元前771年 周政权的崩溃,天明开始脱离单一和普遍统治的观念。从此以后,它可以指一个地区领主的霸权,或统治一个国家的权利,或只是指一个合适的时刻或个人的命运。许多人质疑“天明”作为一个保证政治秩序的积极的神的想法,这进一步削弱了天明的吸引力。然而,西周的天明观念并没有完全消失。它仍然是“一种备用的意识形态”,是广泛的政治思想工具包的一部分,被汉朝帝国的思想家们重新发现和重新部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Elusive Mandate of Heaven: Changing Views of Tianming 天命 in the Eastern Zhou Period
The concept of tianming 天命 (Mandate of Heaven/Heaven’s Mandate) is often viewed as a foundational principle of Chinese political culture. However, as paleographic and textual evidence marshalled in our article suggests, during the formative age of this culture—the Eastern Zhou period (eighth through third centuries BCE)—this concept underwent profound changes and lost much of its original appeal. With the de facto collapse of Zhou authority in 771 BCE, tianming became dissociated from the idea of singular and universal rule. Henceforth it could refer to a regional lord’s hegemonic power, or the right to rule one’s state, or just to an opportune moment or individual destiny. The very idea of Heaven as an activist deity that guaranteed political order was questioned by many, further eroding the appeal of tianming. However, the Western Zhou notion of tianming did not perish altogether. It remained “an ideology in reserve,” part of a broad toolkit of political ideas, to be rediscovered and redeployed by Han dynasty imperial ideologues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
T'oung Pao
T'oung Pao ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The Early Qing Compilation of the Ming History in Manchu: The Contexts, Contents, and Significance of the Ming gurun i suduri From Stone Canal to Orchid Terrace: Libraries and Archives in the Two Han Capitals Books of Fate and Popular Culture in Early China: The Daybook Manuscripts of the Warring States, Qin, and Han , by Donald Harper and Marc Kalinowski (eds.) The Penumbra of the Great Tang: Poetry from the Margins of the Empire at the Turn of the Eighth Century The Quanzhou Qianfo xinzhu zhuzushi song (Or.8210/S.1635): Manuscript, Textual History, and Genealogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1