多平台MOOC分析:比较edX和Edraak的全球和地区模式

José A. Ruipérez Valiente, Sherif A. Halawa, J. Reich
{"title":"多平台MOOC分析:比较edX和Edraak的全球和地区模式","authors":"José A. Ruipérez Valiente, Sherif A. Halawa, J. Reich","doi":"10.1145/3330430.3333616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While global massive open online course (MOOC) providers such as edX, Coursera, and FutureLearn have garnered the bulk of attention from researchers and the popular press, MOOCs are also provisioned by a series of regional providers, who are often using the Open edX platform. We leverage the data infrastructure shared by the main edX instance and one regional Open edX provider, Edraak in Jordan, to compare the experience of learners from Arab countries on both platforms. Comparing learners from Arab countries on edX to those on Edraak, the Edraak population has a more even gender balance, more learners with lower education levels, greater participation from more developing countries, higher levels of persistence and completion, and a larger total population of learners. This \"apples to apples\" comparison of MOOC learners is facilitated by an approach to multiplatform MOOC analytics, which employs parallel research processes to create joint aggregate datasets without sharing identifiable data across institutions. Our findings suggest that greater research attention should be paid towards regional MOOC providers, and regional providers may have an important role to play in expanding access to higher education.","PeriodicalId":20693,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","volume":"189 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiplatform MOOC Analytics: Comparing Global and Regional Patterns in edX and Edraak\",\"authors\":\"José A. Ruipérez Valiente, Sherif A. Halawa, J. Reich\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3330430.3333616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While global massive open online course (MOOC) providers such as edX, Coursera, and FutureLearn have garnered the bulk of attention from researchers and the popular press, MOOCs are also provisioned by a series of regional providers, who are often using the Open edX platform. We leverage the data infrastructure shared by the main edX instance and one regional Open edX provider, Edraak in Jordan, to compare the experience of learners from Arab countries on both platforms. Comparing learners from Arab countries on edX to those on Edraak, the Edraak population has a more even gender balance, more learners with lower education levels, greater participation from more developing countries, higher levels of persistence and completion, and a larger total population of learners. This \\\"apples to apples\\\" comparison of MOOC learners is facilitated by an approach to multiplatform MOOC analytics, which employs parallel research processes to create joint aggregate datasets without sharing identifiable data across institutions. Our findings suggest that greater research attention should be paid towards regional MOOC providers, and regional providers may have an important role to play in expanding access to higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

虽然全球大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)提供商,如edX、Coursera和FutureLearn,已经获得了研究人员和大众媒体的大量关注,但MOOC也由一系列地区提供商提供,他们通常使用开放edX平台。我们利用主要edX实例和一个区域开放edX提供商(约旦的Edraak)共享的数据基础设施,比较来自阿拉伯国家学习者在两个平台上的体验。将阿拉伯国家在edX上的学习者与在Edraak上的学习者进行比较,Edraak人口的性别平衡更为均衡,更多的受教育程度较低的学习者,更多的发展中国家的参与,更高的坚持和完成程度,以及更多的学习者总数。多平台MOOC分析方法促进了这种对MOOC学习者的“苹果对苹果”的比较,该方法采用并行研究过程来创建联合汇总数据集,而无需跨机构共享可识别的数据。我们的研究结果表明,应该对区域MOOC提供者给予更多的关注,区域提供者可能在扩大高等教育机会方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiplatform MOOC Analytics: Comparing Global and Regional Patterns in edX and Edraak
While global massive open online course (MOOC) providers such as edX, Coursera, and FutureLearn have garnered the bulk of attention from researchers and the popular press, MOOCs are also provisioned by a series of regional providers, who are often using the Open edX platform. We leverage the data infrastructure shared by the main edX instance and one regional Open edX provider, Edraak in Jordan, to compare the experience of learners from Arab countries on both platforms. Comparing learners from Arab countries on edX to those on Edraak, the Edraak population has a more even gender balance, more learners with lower education levels, greater participation from more developing countries, higher levels of persistence and completion, and a larger total population of learners. This "apples to apples" comparison of MOOC learners is facilitated by an approach to multiplatform MOOC analytics, which employs parallel research processes to create joint aggregate datasets without sharing identifiable data across institutions. Our findings suggest that greater research attention should be paid towards regional MOOC providers, and regional providers may have an important role to play in expanding access to higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating a Framework for User-Centered Development and Improvement of Digital Education Teaching UI Design at Global Scales: A Case Study of the Design of Collaborative Capstone Projects for MOOCs Mining Students Pre-instruction Beliefs for Improved Learning Achievements for building a learning community Instructors Desire Student Activity, Literacy, and Video Quality Analytics to Improve Video-based Blended Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1