心灵与大脑的联系:约翰·埃克尔斯爵士与现代二元互动论

Danko D. Georgiev
{"title":"心灵与大脑的联系:约翰·埃克尔斯爵士与现代二元互动论","authors":"Danko D. Georgiev","doi":"10.14748/BMR.V22.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our minds, constituted by conscious experiences, are both the most familiar and most mysterious aspect of our lives. Despite the large amount of clinical evidence suggesting an intimate relationship between the brain function and the mind, the nature of this relationship remains poorly understood. In this Commentary we discuss some of the problems faced by the classical mind-brain identity theory and explain how the quantum dualistic interactionism proposed by Sir John Eccles could resolve these problems. Biomedical Reviews 2011; 22: 81-84.","PeriodicalId":8906,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A linkage of mind and brain: Sir John Eccles and modern dualistic interactionism\",\"authors\":\"Danko D. Georgiev\",\"doi\":\"10.14748/BMR.V22.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our minds, constituted by conscious experiences, are both the most familiar and most mysterious aspect of our lives. Despite the large amount of clinical evidence suggesting an intimate relationship between the brain function and the mind, the nature of this relationship remains poorly understood. In this Commentary we discuss some of the problems faced by the classical mind-brain identity theory and explain how the quantum dualistic interactionism proposed by Sir John Eccles could resolve these problems. Biomedical Reviews 2011; 22: 81-84.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14748/BMR.V22.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/BMR.V22.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们的思想,由有意识的经验构成,是我们生活中最熟悉和最神秘的方面。尽管大量的临床证据表明大脑功能和心智之间存在着密切的关系,但人们对这种关系的本质仍然知之甚少。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了经典的心脑同一性理论所面临的一些问题,并解释了约翰·埃克尔斯爵士提出的量子二元论相互作用论如何解决这些问题。生物医学评论2011;22日:81 - 84。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A linkage of mind and brain: Sir John Eccles and modern dualistic interactionism
Our minds, constituted by conscious experiences, are both the most familiar and most mysterious aspect of our lives. Despite the large amount of clinical evidence suggesting an intimate relationship between the brain function and the mind, the nature of this relationship remains poorly understood. In this Commentary we discuss some of the problems faced by the classical mind-brain identity theory and explain how the quantum dualistic interactionism proposed by Sir John Eccles could resolve these problems. Biomedical Reviews 2011; 22: 81-84.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of NANOG in glioma malignancy development and potential as therapeutic target A sample copy of the textbook Principles of Cell and Tissue Biology In defense of the murburn explanation for aerobic respiration The great Geoffrey Burnstock: A passion for discovery and empathy On the new prospects in biology inspired by epigenetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1