一次性皮下注射针斜穿橡胶塞后小瓶取芯和碎裂发生率

Marissa Rase, Mark Hanlon, Le Ho, D. Duriez, Cathy Zhao
{"title":"一次性皮下注射针斜穿橡胶塞后小瓶取芯和碎裂发生率","authors":"Marissa Rase, Mark Hanlon, Le Ho, D. Duriez, Cathy Zhao","doi":"10.1515/pthp-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Particles due to fragmentation present a clear risk to the patient. Reported fragmentation rates vary, and an insertion angle at 45°, as opposed to 90°, has been proposed as a mitigation strategy. So, this study evaluated the fragmentation rates induced by single-use hypodermic needles using different angled penetration techniques. Methods Needles underwent fragmentation testing using two penetration techniques. In method 1, the needle was inserted through the stopper at 45° and rotated to 90° upon exiting the stopper underside, and in method 2 the needle was rotated only after the bevel was fully enveloped by the stopper. Methods were tested with 18, 20, and 22-gauge needles with bevel faced up, down, and sideways. Fragmentation data sets were subjected to ANOVA and a fit to a General Linear Model was attempted to ascertain the significance of needle size, bevel position, and penetration method; p-values less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results Incidence varied from 0 to 49% and depended on the test method. Needles larger than 22-gauge induced fragmentation the most when the bevel was down. The bevel up position induced fragmentation the least. Generation of large fragments designated “cores” depended on all factors examined, and generation of small fragments designated “fragments” depended on all factors except for the penetration method. Conclusions Clinical context and intended application need to be communicated to manufacturers and considered for functional testing when devising end-user recommendations which must reflect a combination of factors.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vial coring and fragmentation incidence after angled penetration of rubber stoppers with single-use hypodermic needles\",\"authors\":\"Marissa Rase, Mark Hanlon, Le Ho, D. Duriez, Cathy Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pthp-2021-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Particles due to fragmentation present a clear risk to the patient. Reported fragmentation rates vary, and an insertion angle at 45°, as opposed to 90°, has been proposed as a mitigation strategy. So, this study evaluated the fragmentation rates induced by single-use hypodermic needles using different angled penetration techniques. Methods Needles underwent fragmentation testing using two penetration techniques. In method 1, the needle was inserted through the stopper at 45° and rotated to 90° upon exiting the stopper underside, and in method 2 the needle was rotated only after the bevel was fully enveloped by the stopper. Methods were tested with 18, 20, and 22-gauge needles with bevel faced up, down, and sideways. Fragmentation data sets were subjected to ANOVA and a fit to a General Linear Model was attempted to ascertain the significance of needle size, bevel position, and penetration method; p-values less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results Incidence varied from 0 to 49% and depended on the test method. Needles larger than 22-gauge induced fragmentation the most when the bevel was down. The bevel up position induced fragmentation the least. Generation of large fragments designated “cores” depended on all factors examined, and generation of small fragments designated “fragments” depended on all factors except for the penetration method. Conclusions Clinical context and intended application need to be communicated to manufacturers and considered for functional testing when devising end-user recommendations which must reflect a combination of factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2021-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

【摘要】目的颗粒破碎对患者存在明显的风险。报告的破碎率各不相同,建议将插入角定为45°,而不是90°,作为一种缓解策略。因此,本研究评估了使用不同角度刺入技术的一次性皮下注射针头引起的碎片率。方法采用两种穿透技术对针进行破片检测。在方法1中,针头从45°穿过塞子,在离开塞子底部时旋转到90°,在方法2中,针头只有在斜角完全被塞子包围后才旋转。采用18号、20号和22号斜面向上、向下和侧向的针进行方法测试。对碎片数据集进行方差分析,并尝试拟合一般线性模型,以确定针的尺寸、斜角位置和穿透方法的重要性;p值小于0.05为有统计学意义。结果不同检测方法的发生率为0 ~ 49%。当斜角向下时,大于22号的针最容易引起碎裂。斜角向上位置引起的碎裂最小。被称为“核”的大碎片的产生取决于所检查的所有因素,而被称为“碎片”的小碎片的产生取决于除渗透方法外的所有因素。临床情况和预期应用需要与制造商沟通,并在设计最终用户建议时考虑功能测试,这些建议必须反映各种因素的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vial coring and fragmentation incidence after angled penetration of rubber stoppers with single-use hypodermic needles
Abstract Objectives Particles due to fragmentation present a clear risk to the patient. Reported fragmentation rates vary, and an insertion angle at 45°, as opposed to 90°, has been proposed as a mitigation strategy. So, this study evaluated the fragmentation rates induced by single-use hypodermic needles using different angled penetration techniques. Methods Needles underwent fragmentation testing using two penetration techniques. In method 1, the needle was inserted through the stopper at 45° and rotated to 90° upon exiting the stopper underside, and in method 2 the needle was rotated only after the bevel was fully enveloped by the stopper. Methods were tested with 18, 20, and 22-gauge needles with bevel faced up, down, and sideways. Fragmentation data sets were subjected to ANOVA and a fit to a General Linear Model was attempted to ascertain the significance of needle size, bevel position, and penetration method; p-values less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results Incidence varied from 0 to 49% and depended on the test method. Needles larger than 22-gauge induced fragmentation the most when the bevel was down. The bevel up position induced fragmentation the least. Generation of large fragments designated “cores” depended on all factors examined, and generation of small fragments designated “fragments” depended on all factors except for the penetration method. Conclusions Clinical context and intended application need to be communicated to manufacturers and considered for functional testing when devising end-user recommendations which must reflect a combination of factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physicochemical stability of urea-containing Mitomycin C preparations in glass vials (1.0 mg/mL) and plastic syringes (2.0, 0.4, 0.2 mg/mL) Physicochemical stability of durvalumab (Imfinzi®) concentrate for solution in original vials after first opening Semi-automatic COVID-19 vaccine preparation for upscaling of vaccination: a descriptive study Assessment of the relevance of osmolality measurement as a criterion for the stability of solutions Use of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to assess the concentration of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine stored in plastic syringes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1