这不是殖民吗?:在南非主流媒体上塑造中南关系

Allen Munoriyarwa, Albert Chibuwe
{"title":"这不是殖民吗?:在南非主流媒体上塑造中南关系","authors":"Allen Munoriyarwa, Albert Chibuwe","doi":"10.36615/jcsa.v41i1.1392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on a media-centric framing theory, and utilising qualitative framing analysis, we examine how selected mainstream newspapers in South Africa framed Sino- South Africa relationships. We observe the ubiquity of negative anti-Chinese frames in the South African mainstream media. We demonstrate that these largely negative frames on China clustered around key issues: its economic relationship with South Africa; human rights issues; and China’s political ties with African regimes. We argue that the negative frames were a result of newspapers’ sourcing routines. Furthermore, we argue that anti-Chinese frames in the South African media sync neatly with a growing negative public perception of China, sustained by global media especially in the West and the US.","PeriodicalId":51949,"journal":{"name":"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is this not colonization?: Framing Sino-South African relations in South Africa’s mainstream press\",\"authors\":\"Allen Munoriyarwa, Albert Chibuwe\",\"doi\":\"10.36615/jcsa.v41i1.1392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on a media-centric framing theory, and utilising qualitative framing analysis, we examine how selected mainstream newspapers in South Africa framed Sino- South Africa relationships. We observe the ubiquity of negative anti-Chinese frames in the South African mainstream media. We demonstrate that these largely negative frames on China clustered around key issues: its economic relationship with South Africa; human rights issues; and China’s political ties with African regimes. We argue that the negative frames were a result of newspapers’ sourcing routines. Furthermore, we argue that anti-Chinese frames in the South African media sync neatly with a growing negative public perception of China, sustained by global media especially in the West and the US.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i1.1392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicare-Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v41i1.1392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

借助以媒体为中心的框架理论,并利用定性框架分析,我们研究了选定的南非主流报纸是如何构建中南关系的。我们观察到南非主流媒体中普遍存在负面反华框架。我们证明,这些对中国的负面评价主要集中在以下几个关键问题上:中国与南非的经济关系;人权问题;以及中国与非洲政权的政治关系。我们认为,负面框架是报纸采购程序的结果。此外,我们认为南非媒体的反华框架与全球媒体(尤其是西方和美国媒体)对中国日益增长的负面公众看法完全同步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is this not colonization?: Framing Sino-South African relations in South Africa’s mainstream press
Drawing on a media-centric framing theory, and utilising qualitative framing analysis, we examine how selected mainstream newspapers in South Africa framed Sino- South Africa relationships. We observe the ubiquity of negative anti-Chinese frames in the South African mainstream media. We demonstrate that these largely negative frames on China clustered around key issues: its economic relationship with South Africa; human rights issues; and China’s political ties with African regimes. We argue that the negative frames were a result of newspapers’ sourcing routines. Furthermore, we argue that anti-Chinese frames in the South African media sync neatly with a growing negative public perception of China, sustained by global media especially in the West and the US.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PENYULUH AGAMA HINDU DI ERA TRASFORMASI DIGITAL GAMBELAN SARON SEBAGAI MEDIA KOMUNIKASI SOSIAL DI DESA ADAT TUMBAKBAYUH MENGWI BADUNG Organisational factors as determinants for online knowledge-sharing behaviour (Re-)Positioning and recognising the influence of internal communication on employee engagement for maximum organisational performance Educators' perceptions on the benefits and barriers of oral PrEP uptake among adolescent girls and young women in Vulindlela, KwaZulu-Natal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1