10秒QoE:短视频片段长度是否足以进行体验质量评估?

Peter Fröhlich, S. Egger, R. Schatz, M. Mühlegger, Kathrin Masuch, B. Gardlo
{"title":"10秒QoE:短视频片段长度是否足以进行体验质量评估?","authors":"Peter Fröhlich, S. Egger, R. Schatz, M. Mühlegger, Kathrin Masuch, B. Gardlo","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard methodologies for subjective video quality testing are based on very short test clips of 10 seconds. But is this duration sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment? In this paper, we present the results of a comparative user study that tests whether quality perception and rating behavior may be different if video clip durations are longer. We did not find strong overall MOS differences between clip durations, but the three longer clips (60, 120 and 240 seconds) were rated slightly more positively than the three shorter durations under comparison (10, 15 and 30 seconds). This difference was most apparent when high quality videos were presented. However, we did not find an interaction between content class and the duration effect itself. Furthermore, methodological implications of these results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":6303,"journal":{"name":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","volume":"8 1","pages":"242-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QoE in 10 seconds: Are short video clip lengths sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment?\",\"authors\":\"Peter Fröhlich, S. Egger, R. Schatz, M. Mühlegger, Kathrin Masuch, B. Gardlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standard methodologies for subjective video quality testing are based on very short test clips of 10 seconds. But is this duration sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment? In this paper, we present the results of a comparative user study that tests whether quality perception and rating behavior may be different if video clip durations are longer. We did not find strong overall MOS differences between clip durations, but the three longer clips (60, 120 and 240 seconds) were rated slightly more positively than the three shorter durations under comparison (10, 15 and 30 seconds). This difference was most apparent when high quality videos were presented. However, we did not find an interaction between content class and the duration effect itself. Furthermore, methodological implications of these results are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"242-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

主观视频质量测试的标准方法是基于10秒的非常短的测试片段。但是这个持续时间是否足以进行体验质量评估?在本文中,我们提出了一项比较用户研究的结果,该研究测试了如果视频剪辑持续时间较长,质量感知和评级行为是否会有所不同。我们没有发现短片长度之间的总体MOS差异,但三个较长的短片(60、120和240秒)的评分略高于三个较短的短片(10、15和30秒)。这种差异在播放高质量视频时最为明显。然而,我们没有发现内容类和持续时间效应本身之间的交互作用。此外,还讨论了这些结果的方法学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QoE in 10 seconds: Are short video clip lengths sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment?
Standard methodologies for subjective video quality testing are based on very short test clips of 10 seconds. But is this duration sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment? In this paper, we present the results of a comparative user study that tests whether quality perception and rating behavior may be different if video clip durations are longer. We did not find strong overall MOS differences between clip durations, but the three longer clips (60, 120 and 240 seconds) were rated slightly more positively than the three shorter durations under comparison (10, 15 and 30 seconds). This difference was most apparent when high quality videos were presented. However, we did not find an interaction between content class and the duration effect itself. Furthermore, methodological implications of these results are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the effects of test clip quality distribution in HD video Quality-of-Experience studies No-reference bitstream-based impairment detection for high efficiency video coding A perceptual quality based rate distortion model Evaluation of visual privacy filters impact on video surveillance intelligibility Too tired for calling? A physiological measure of fatigue caused by bandwidth limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1