行为经济学在法律中的演化力

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Review of Law & Economics Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3871414
Saul Levmore
{"title":"行为经济学在法律中的演化力","authors":"Saul Levmore","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3871414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the interaction, rather than the competition, among incentivist (or rationalist), behavioral, and evolutionary explanations of legal rules and approaches to problems of public policy. It suggests that behavioral economics can play an important role in influencing people where an incentive-based approach to affecting behavior was tried first and failed on a subset of the targeted group. The discussion ranges across examples including savings rates, the performance of educational institutions, health care, rescue, and even university admissions to explore a range of behavioral tools, with a focus on endowment effects and N-of-1 thinking, in order to bring out the clash among – and the teamwork that is possible with – these three approaches.","PeriodicalId":44795,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolutionary Force of Behavioral Economics in Law\",\"authors\":\"Saul Levmore\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3871414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper explores the interaction, rather than the competition, among incentivist (or rationalist), behavioral, and evolutionary explanations of legal rules and approaches to problems of public policy. It suggests that behavioral economics can play an important role in influencing people where an incentive-based approach to affecting behavior was tried first and failed on a subset of the targeted group. The discussion ranges across examples including savings rates, the performance of educational institutions, health care, rescue, and even university admissions to explore a range of behavioral tools, with a focus on endowment effects and N-of-1 thinking, in order to bring out the clash among – and the teamwork that is possible with – these three approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Law & Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Law & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文探讨了激励主义(或理性主义)、行为主义和进化主义对法律规则和公共政策问题的解释之间的相互作用,而不是竞争。这表明,行为经济学可以在影响人们方面发挥重要作用,在这种情况下,基于激励的影响行为的方法首先被尝试过,但在目标群体的一个子集上失败了。讨论的范围包括储蓄率、教育机构的绩效、医疗保健、救援,甚至大学招生,以探索一系列行为工具,重点关注禀赋效应和N-of-1思维,以揭示这三种方法之间的冲突,以及可能的团队合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Evolutionary Force of Behavioral Economics in Law
Abstract This paper explores the interaction, rather than the competition, among incentivist (or rationalist), behavioral, and evolutionary explanations of legal rules and approaches to problems of public policy. It suggests that behavioral economics can play an important role in influencing people where an incentive-based approach to affecting behavior was tried first and failed on a subset of the targeted group. The discussion ranges across examples including savings rates, the performance of educational institutions, health care, rescue, and even university admissions to explore a range of behavioral tools, with a focus on endowment effects and N-of-1 thinking, in order to bring out the clash among – and the teamwork that is possible with – these three approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The Disavowal of Decisionism: Politically Motivated Exits from the U.S. Courts of Appeals On the Role of Sales Taxes for Efficient Compensation of Property Loss Under Strict Liability Broadband Internet and Crime Unraveling the Peltzman Effect: The Significance of Agent’s Type Do US State Breach Notification Laws Decrease Firm Data Breaches?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1