同时举行大选:印尼民主是公平的

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.24905/jip.6.1.2021.56-64
Kadir Johnson Rajagukguk, Sofjan Aripin, Heri Wahyudi
{"title":"同时举行大选:印尼民主是公平的","authors":"Kadir Johnson Rajagukguk, Sofjan Aripin, Heri Wahyudi","doi":"10.24905/jip.6.1.2021.56-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the implementation of simultaneous elections in 2019 which is the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 14/PUU-11/2013 on simultaneous elections, and the purpose of this study is to examine and analyze whether the 2019 concurrent elections took place democratically and have a success rate to strengthen the consolidation of democracy and institutionalization of political parties in Indonesia. This research was conducted in North Sumatra, Banten, West Java and West Kalimantan. Furthermore, this study uses the theory of the pillars of the democratic system and the Theory of Success of Procedural and Substantive Quality Democracy. The method of research that is used is descriptive method with qualitative approach. With data analysis techniques. The findings show that the democratization of a concurrent election in 2019 is analyzed based on the pillars of a system that gives influence to the quality of the success rate of a democracy both procedural democracy and substantive democracy that measures the success rate of a democracy. Simultaneous elections in 2019 have increased public political participation and the Indonesian Democracy Index (IDI) but a new study is needed to measure the institutionalization of political parties so that comprehensively it can be known the level of democratization, consolidation of democracy and its relation to institutionalization or institutionalization of political parties.","PeriodicalId":40252,"journal":{"name":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous General Election: It Is Fair for Democracy in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Kadir Johnson Rajagukguk, Sofjan Aripin, Heri Wahyudi\",\"doi\":\"10.24905/jip.6.1.2021.56-64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study discusses the implementation of simultaneous elections in 2019 which is the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 14/PUU-11/2013 on simultaneous elections, and the purpose of this study is to examine and analyze whether the 2019 concurrent elections took place democratically and have a success rate to strengthen the consolidation of democracy and institutionalization of political parties in Indonesia. This research was conducted in North Sumatra, Banten, West Java and West Kalimantan. Furthermore, this study uses the theory of the pillars of the democratic system and the Theory of Success of Procedural and Substantive Quality Democracy. The method of research that is used is descriptive method with qualitative approach. With data analysis techniques. The findings show that the democratization of a concurrent election in 2019 is analyzed based on the pillars of a system that gives influence to the quality of the success rate of a democracy both procedural democracy and substantive democracy that measures the success rate of a democracy. Simultaneous elections in 2019 have increased public political participation and the Indonesian Democracy Index (IDI) but a new study is needed to measure the institutionalization of political parties so that comprehensively it can be known the level of democratization, consolidation of democracy and its relation to institutionalization or institutionalization of political parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.6.1.2021.56-64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.6.1.2021.56-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究讨论了2019年同步选举的实施情况,即宪法法院第14/ puu / 11/2013号关于同步选举的决定,本研究的目的是检验和分析2019年同步选举是否民主地进行并有成功率,以加强印度尼西亚的民主巩固和政党制度化。这项研究是在北苏门答腊、万丹、西爪哇和西加里曼丹进行的。此外,本研究还运用了民主制度的支柱理论和程序质量民主与实质质量民主的成功理论。所使用的研究方法是描述性方法和定性方法。运用数据分析技术。分析结果显示,2019年并行选举民主化是根据衡量民主主义成功率的程序民主主义和实质民主主义对民主主义成功率质量产生影响的制度支柱进行分析的。2019年的同步选举增加了公众政治参与和印度尼西亚民主指数(IDI),但需要一项新的研究来衡量政党的制度化,以便全面了解民主化水平,巩固民主及其与制度化或政党制度化的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simultaneous General Election: It Is Fair for Democracy in Indonesia
This study discusses the implementation of simultaneous elections in 2019 which is the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 14/PUU-11/2013 on simultaneous elections, and the purpose of this study is to examine and analyze whether the 2019 concurrent elections took place democratically and have a success rate to strengthen the consolidation of democracy and institutionalization of political parties in Indonesia. This research was conducted in North Sumatra, Banten, West Java and West Kalimantan. Furthermore, this study uses the theory of the pillars of the democratic system and the Theory of Success of Procedural and Substantive Quality Democracy. The method of research that is used is descriptive method with qualitative approach. With data analysis techniques. The findings show that the democratization of a concurrent election in 2019 is analyzed based on the pillars of a system that gives influence to the quality of the success rate of a democracy both procedural democracy and substantive democracy that measures the success rate of a democracy. Simultaneous elections in 2019 have increased public political participation and the Indonesian Democracy Index (IDI) but a new study is needed to measure the institutionalization of political parties so that comprehensively it can be known the level of democratization, consolidation of democracy and its relation to institutionalization or institutionalization of political parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Civil Service Police Unit principle : no punishment and no taxation without representation The Bretton Woods institutions and the quest for development in Africa Disputing land: argumentative turn in local land policy conflict in Central Java, Indonesia Declining democracy: autocratization in Indonesia during the Jokowi years Policy process in Indonesia during COVID-19: a cross-sectoral policy perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1