{"title":"什么不能被解构?真理","authors":"Piotr Kozak","doi":"10.21697/spch.2022.58.a.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I discuss the interpretation of the method of deconstruction in David J. Gunkel’s Deconstruction (MIT Press 2021). I focus on the relationship between deconstruction and truth. I hold that the concept of truth is indispensable for deconstruction since truth introduces correctness conditions for the deconstructive method. However, I claim that truth, being essential and primitive for deconstruction, is fundamentally inaccessible for being analyzed by the latter. \n------------------------- \nReceived: 19/10/2022. Reviewed: 13/12/2022. Accepted: 20/12/2022.","PeriodicalId":21980,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophiae Christianae","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Cannot Be Deconstructed? Truth\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Kozak\",\"doi\":\"10.21697/spch.2022.58.a.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I discuss the interpretation of the method of deconstruction in David J. Gunkel’s Deconstruction (MIT Press 2021). I focus on the relationship between deconstruction and truth. I hold that the concept of truth is indispensable for deconstruction since truth introduces correctness conditions for the deconstructive method. However, I claim that truth, being essential and primitive for deconstruction, is fundamentally inaccessible for being analyzed by the latter. \\n------------------------- \\nReceived: 19/10/2022. Reviewed: 13/12/2022. Accepted: 20/12/2022.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Philosophiae Christianae\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Philosophiae Christianae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2022.58.a.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophiae Christianae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2022.58.a.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本文中，我讨论了David J. Gunkel的解构(MIT Press 2021)中解构方法的解释。我关注的是解构与真理之间的关系。我认为真理的概念对于解构是不可或缺的，因为真理为解构方法引入了正确的条件。然而，我认为真理对于解构主义来说是本质的和原始的，而对于解构主义来说，真理从根本上是不可接近的。-------------------------收稿日期:19/10/2022。综述:13/12/2022。接受:20/12/2022。
In this paper, I discuss the interpretation of the method of deconstruction in David J. Gunkel’s Deconstruction (MIT Press 2021). I focus on the relationship between deconstruction and truth. I hold that the concept of truth is indispensable for deconstruction since truth introduces correctness conditions for the deconstructive method. However, I claim that truth, being essential and primitive for deconstruction, is fundamentally inaccessible for being analyzed by the latter.
-------------------------
Received: 19/10/2022. Reviewed: 13/12/2022. Accepted: 20/12/2022.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
