大教堂和干草堆:有限责任和公司集团的一种观点

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW American Bankruptcy Law Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3651546
A. Graham
{"title":"大教堂和干草堆:有限责任和公司集团的一种观点","authors":"A. Graham","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3651546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will examine the ways in which parent companies within corporate groups can be held liable by means of common law doctrines and statutory principles. Where a subsidiary company within a corporate group becomes insolvent and is unable to pay its creditors in full, the principles of separate legal personality and limited liability mean that a parent company will not normally be held liable. What will be explored further are the circumstances in which these default principles of corporate separateness can be ignored and liability be extended beyond the insolvent subsidiary to the solvent corporate shareholder. The support for enhanced liability is clear and represents an uncommon convergence of opinion and outcomes in corporate law scholarship. It is suggested that a complete reimagination of limited liability is not necessary. Rather, what is necessary is a modification of the current rules governing liability regarding involuntary creditors. This should be viewed as a mere readjustment to the relationship between companies and their tort victims, as opposed to a completely new form of liability.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cathedral and the Haystack: One View of Limited Liability and Corporate Groups\",\"authors\":\"A. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3651546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper will examine the ways in which parent companies within corporate groups can be held liable by means of common law doctrines and statutory principles. Where a subsidiary company within a corporate group becomes insolvent and is unable to pay its creditors in full, the principles of separate legal personality and limited liability mean that a parent company will not normally be held liable. What will be explored further are the circumstances in which these default principles of corporate separateness can be ignored and liability be extended beyond the insolvent subsidiary to the solvent corporate shareholder. The support for enhanced liability is clear and represents an uncommon convergence of opinion and outcomes in corporate law scholarship. It is suggested that a complete reimagination of limited liability is not necessary. Rather, what is necessary is a modification of the current rules governing liability regarding involuntary creditors. This should be viewed as a mere readjustment to the relationship between companies and their tort victims, as opposed to a completely new form of liability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3651546\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3651546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将通过普通法理论和成文法原则来探讨企业集团内部母公司的责任追究方式。如果公司集团内的子公司资不抵债,无法向债权人全额付款,根据独立法人资格和有限责任原则,母公司通常不会承担责任。将进一步探讨的是,在哪些情况下,这些公司分离的默认原则可以被忽视,责任可以从资不抵债的子公司延伸到资不抵债的公司股东。对强化责任的支持是明确的,这代表了公司法学术观点和结果的罕见趋同。有人建议,没有必要对有限责任进行完全的重新构想。相反,必要的是修改有关非自愿债权人责任的现行规则。这应被视为仅仅是对公司与其侵权受害者之间关系的重新调整,而不是一种全新的责任形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cathedral and the Haystack: One View of Limited Liability and Corporate Groups
This paper will examine the ways in which parent companies within corporate groups can be held liable by means of common law doctrines and statutory principles. Where a subsidiary company within a corporate group becomes insolvent and is unable to pay its creditors in full, the principles of separate legal personality and limited liability mean that a parent company will not normally be held liable. What will be explored further are the circumstances in which these default principles of corporate separateness can be ignored and liability be extended beyond the insolvent subsidiary to the solvent corporate shareholder. The support for enhanced liability is clear and represents an uncommon convergence of opinion and outcomes in corporate law scholarship. It is suggested that a complete reimagination of limited liability is not necessary. Rather, what is necessary is a modification of the current rules governing liability regarding involuntary creditors. This should be viewed as a mere readjustment to the relationship between companies and their tort victims, as opposed to a completely new form of liability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Steering Loan Modifications Post-Pandemic Passing the Parcel? Relationship Banking at the Onset of Financial Distress Treatment of Disputed Claims in Corporate Insolvency: Evolving Jurisprudence Paper Series VII - Arrangements and Compromise Government Activism in Bankruptcy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1