基于参与者的、应用程序感知的访问控制评估框架

W. C. Garrison, Adam J. Lee, Timothy L. Hinrichs
{"title":"基于参与者的、应用程序感知的访问控制评估框架","authors":"W. C. Garrison, Adam J. Lee, Timothy L. Hinrichs","doi":"10.1145/2613087.2613099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, most work regarding the formal analysis of access control schemes has focused on quantifying and comparing the expressive power of a set of schemes. Although expressive power is important, it is a property that exists in an *absolute* sense, detached from the application context within which an access control scheme will ultimately be deployed. By contrast, we formalize the access control *suitability analysis problem*, which seeks to evaluate the degree to which a set of candidate access control schemes can meet the needs of an application-specific workload. This process involves both reductions to assess whether a scheme is *capable* of implementing a workload (qualitative analysis), as well as cost analysis using ordered measures to quantify the *overheads* of using each candidate scheme to service the workload (quantitative analysis). We formalize the two-facet suitability analysis problem, which formally describes this task. We then develop a mathematical framework for this type of analysis, and evaluate this framework both formally, by quantifying its efficiency and accuracy properties, and practically, by exploring an academic program committee workload.","PeriodicalId":74509,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","volume":"481 1","pages":"199-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An actor-based, application-aware access control evaluation framework\",\"authors\":\"W. C. Garrison, Adam J. Lee, Timothy L. Hinrichs\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2613087.2613099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To date, most work regarding the formal analysis of access control schemes has focused on quantifying and comparing the expressive power of a set of schemes. Although expressive power is important, it is a property that exists in an *absolute* sense, detached from the application context within which an access control scheme will ultimately be deployed. By contrast, we formalize the access control *suitability analysis problem*, which seeks to evaluate the degree to which a set of candidate access control schemes can meet the needs of an application-specific workload. This process involves both reductions to assess whether a scheme is *capable* of implementing a workload (qualitative analysis), as well as cost analysis using ordered measures to quantify the *overheads* of using each candidate scheme to service the workload (quantitative analysis). We formalize the two-facet suitability analysis problem, which formally describes this task. We then develop a mathematical framework for this type of analysis, and evaluate this framework both formally, by quantifying its efficiency and accuracy properties, and practically, by exploring an academic program committee workload.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"481 1\",\"pages\":\"199-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2613087.2613099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2613087.2613099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

迄今为止,关于访问控制方案的形式化分析的大多数工作都集中在量化和比较一组方案的表达能力上。虽然表达能力很重要,但它是一种“绝对”存在的属性,与最终部署访问控制方案的应用程序上下文分离。相比之下,我们形式化了访问控制*适用性分析问题*,该问题旨在评估一组候选访问控制方案能够满足特定应用程序工作负载需求的程度。这一过程包括两方面的削减,以评估一个方案是否“能够”实现工作量(定性分析),以及使用有序的措施进行成本分析,以量化使用每个候选方案来服务工作量的“间接费用”(定量分析)。我们形式化了两方面的适用性分析问题,它形式化地描述了这个任务。然后,我们为这种类型的分析开发了一个数学框架,并通过量化其效率和准确性属性,以及通过探索学术项目委员会的工作量,正式地评估这个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An actor-based, application-aware access control evaluation framework
To date, most work regarding the formal analysis of access control schemes has focused on quantifying and comparing the expressive power of a set of schemes. Although expressive power is important, it is a property that exists in an *absolute* sense, detached from the application context within which an access control scheme will ultimately be deployed. By contrast, we formalize the access control *suitability analysis problem*, which seeks to evaluate the degree to which a set of candidate access control schemes can meet the needs of an application-specific workload. This process involves both reductions to assess whether a scheme is *capable* of implementing a workload (qualitative analysis), as well as cost analysis using ordered measures to quantify the *overheads* of using each candidate scheme to service the workload (quantitative analysis). We formalize the two-facet suitability analysis problem, which formally describes this task. We then develop a mathematical framework for this type of analysis, and evaluate this framework both formally, by quantifying its efficiency and accuracy properties, and practically, by exploring an academic program committee workload.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sidecar-based Path-aware Security for Microservices Poster: How to Raise a Robot - Beyond Access Control Constraints in Assistive Humanoid Robots Demo: A Multimodal Behavioral Biometric Scheme for Smartphone User Authentication (MBBS) Qualitative Intention-aware Attribute-based Access Control Policy Refinement SpaceMediator: Leveraging Authorization Policies to Prevent Spatial and Privacy Attacks in Mobile Augmented Reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1