伊朗三种针叶树地上总生物量的异速生长模型和生物量转换与扩展因子

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Forest Science Pub Date : 2023-04-15 DOI:10.1093/forsci/fxad013
Hassan A. M. Ali, J. Mohammadi, Shaban Shataee Jouibary
{"title":"伊朗三种针叶树地上总生物量的异速生长模型和生物量转换与扩展因子","authors":"Hassan A. M. Ali, J. Mohammadi, Shaban Shataee Jouibary","doi":"10.1093/forsci/fxad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Accurate estimation of total aboveground biomass (TAGB) is an important challenge in evaluating and monitoring tree biomass. Thus, developing species-specific allometric models is essential. This study aimed to predict tree-level TAGB for Pinus brutia, Pinus pinea, Cupressus sempervirens, and the species-independent case using the most accurate allometric models, biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), and mixed effect models in Golestan Province, Iran. The mean BCEFs for three species were 0.46, 0.47, and 0.86, respectively, and there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between TAGB predictions based on BCEF estimates for this study and observations of TAGB. The results revealed that compared with relative root mean square error (RMSE%) for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report–based BCEFs, the RMSE% for BCEFs estimated for this study were reduced by 46.91%. The results showed that a diameter at breast height (DBH), height (H), and wood density (ρ)-based model were the most accurate predictors for P. brutia (R2=0.98, RMSE%=14.11), whereas the DBH-based model and the DBH and H-based model were most accurate for P. pinea (R2=0.99, RMSE%=9.04) and C. sempervirens (R2=0.96, RMSE%=17.77), respectively. Compared to the allometric models, mixed-effect models using DBH, H, and ρ improved TAGB prediction for the species-independent case (3% increase in R2 and 6.81% decrease in RMSE%), but not for models for P. brutia, P. pinea, and C. sempervirens.\n Study Implications: Accurate prediction of total tree-level aboveground biomass (TAGB) requires the most accurate allometric models plus accurate biomass conversion and expansion factors (BCEFs). The relevance of this study is that few allometric models have been developed to predict tree-level TAGB for Pinus brutia, Pinus pinea, and Cupressus sempervirens. We developed allometric models and estimated BCEFs for predicting TAGB for P. brutia, P. pinea, and C. sempervirens in Golestan Province, Iran. We provide accurate allometric models and BCEFs based on available field data. Also, we provide tools to help forest managers predict TAGB.","PeriodicalId":12749,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allometric Models and Biomass Conversion and Expansion Factors to Predict Total Tree-level Aboveground Biomass for Three Conifers Species in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Hassan A. M. Ali, J. Mohammadi, Shaban Shataee Jouibary\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/forsci/fxad013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Accurate estimation of total aboveground biomass (TAGB) is an important challenge in evaluating and monitoring tree biomass. Thus, developing species-specific allometric models is essential. This study aimed to predict tree-level TAGB for Pinus brutia, Pinus pinea, Cupressus sempervirens, and the species-independent case using the most accurate allometric models, biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), and mixed effect models in Golestan Province, Iran. The mean BCEFs for three species were 0.46, 0.47, and 0.86, respectively, and there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between TAGB predictions based on BCEF estimates for this study and observations of TAGB. The results revealed that compared with relative root mean square error (RMSE%) for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report–based BCEFs, the RMSE% for BCEFs estimated for this study were reduced by 46.91%. The results showed that a diameter at breast height (DBH), height (H), and wood density (ρ)-based model were the most accurate predictors for P. brutia (R2=0.98, RMSE%=14.11), whereas the DBH-based model and the DBH and H-based model were most accurate for P. pinea (R2=0.99, RMSE%=9.04) and C. sempervirens (R2=0.96, RMSE%=17.77), respectively. Compared to the allometric models, mixed-effect models using DBH, H, and ρ improved TAGB prediction for the species-independent case (3% increase in R2 and 6.81% decrease in RMSE%), but not for models for P. brutia, P. pinea, and C. sempervirens.\\n Study Implications: Accurate prediction of total tree-level aboveground biomass (TAGB) requires the most accurate allometric models plus accurate biomass conversion and expansion factors (BCEFs). The relevance of this study is that few allometric models have been developed to predict tree-level TAGB for Pinus brutia, Pinus pinea, and Cupressus sempervirens. We developed allometric models and estimated BCEFs for predicting TAGB for P. brutia, P. pinea, and C. sempervirens in Golestan Province, Iran. We provide accurate allometric models and BCEFs based on available field data. Also, we provide tools to help forest managers predict TAGB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Science\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxad013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxad013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估算地上总生物量(TAGB)是评估和监测树木生物量的重要挑战。因此,建立物种特异性异速生长模型至关重要。本研究旨在利用最精确的异速生长模型、生物量转换和扩张因子(BCEF)和混合效应模型,对伊朗Golestan省brutia、Pinus pinea、柏树(Cupressus sempervirens)和种独立情况下的树级TAGB进行预测。3个物种的平均BCEFs分别为0.46、0.47和0.86,本研究基于BCEF估计的TAGB预测值与TAGB观测值无显著差异(p>0.05)。结果表明,与基于政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)报告的BCEFs的相对均方根误差(RMSE%)相比,本研究估计的BCEFs的RMSE%降低了46.91%。结果表明,胸径(DBH)、高度(H)和木材密度(ρ)模型对野青松(P. brutia)的预测精度最高(R2=0.98, RMSE%=14.11),胸径(DBH)模型和胸径(DBH)和密度(ρ)模型对松果松(P. pinea)和sempervirens的预测精度最高(R2=0.99, RMSE%=9.04) (R2=0.96, RMSE%=17.77)。与异速生长模型相比,使用DBH、H和ρ的混合效应模型改善了物种无关病例的TAGB预测(R2增加3%,RMSE%降低6.81%),但对brutia、ppinea和C. sempervirens的模型没有改善。研究意义:准确预测树上总生物量(TAGB)需要最精确的异速生长模型和准确的生物量转换和膨胀因子(BCEFs)。本研究的相关性在于,目前很少有异速生长模型用于预测粗松、松果和柏树的树级TAGB。我们开发了异速生长模型,并估计了BCEFs,用于预测伊朗Golestan省布鲁氏假单胞菌、菠萝假单胞菌和sempervirens的TAGB。我们根据现有的现场数据提供准确的异速生长模型和BCEFs。此外,我们还提供了工具来帮助森林管理者预测TAGB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allometric Models and Biomass Conversion and Expansion Factors to Predict Total Tree-level Aboveground Biomass for Three Conifers Species in Iran
Accurate estimation of total aboveground biomass (TAGB) is an important challenge in evaluating and monitoring tree biomass. Thus, developing species-specific allometric models is essential. This study aimed to predict tree-level TAGB for Pinus brutia, Pinus pinea, Cupressus sempervirens, and the species-independent case using the most accurate allometric models, biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), and mixed effect models in Golestan Province, Iran. The mean BCEFs for three species were 0.46, 0.47, and 0.86, respectively, and there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between TAGB predictions based on BCEF estimates for this study and observations of TAGB. The results revealed that compared with relative root mean square error (RMSE%) for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report–based BCEFs, the RMSE% for BCEFs estimated for this study were reduced by 46.91%. The results showed that a diameter at breast height (DBH), height (H), and wood density (ρ)-based model were the most accurate predictors for P. brutia (R2=0.98, RMSE%=14.11), whereas the DBH-based model and the DBH and H-based model were most accurate for P. pinea (R2=0.99, RMSE%=9.04) and C. sempervirens (R2=0.96, RMSE%=17.77), respectively. Compared to the allometric models, mixed-effect models using DBH, H, and ρ improved TAGB prediction for the species-independent case (3% increase in R2 and 6.81% decrease in RMSE%), but not for models for P. brutia, P. pinea, and C. sempervirens. Study Implications: Accurate prediction of total tree-level aboveground biomass (TAGB) requires the most accurate allometric models plus accurate biomass conversion and expansion factors (BCEFs). The relevance of this study is that few allometric models have been developed to predict tree-level TAGB for Pinus brutia, Pinus pinea, and Cupressus sempervirens. We developed allometric models and estimated BCEFs for predicting TAGB for P. brutia, P. pinea, and C. sempervirens in Golestan Province, Iran. We provide accurate allometric models and BCEFs based on available field data. Also, we provide tools to help forest managers predict TAGB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Science
Forest Science 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management. Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
期刊最新文献
Selective Postplanting Forb Control Increased Growth of Douglas-Fir but Not Western Larch Seedlings in Idaho Accuracy of Whitebark Pine and Limber Pine Identification by Forest Inventory and Analysis Field Crews Applying Ratio-of-Means Estimation for Annualized Components of Volume Change in Forest Resource Monitoring Genetic Variability for Clonal Propagation of Acacia mearnsii Cointegration of Timberland Value in the United States, South and Central America, and Oceania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1