寻找埃博拉病毒的源头:2013-2016年西非疫情期间导致其向人类蔓延的难以捉摸的因素。

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI:10.20506/rst.38.1.2946
R. Kock, M. Begovoeva, R. Ansumana, R. Suluku
{"title":"寻找埃博拉病毒的源头:2013-2016年西非疫情期间导致其向人类蔓延的难以捉摸的因素。","authors":"R. Kock, M. Begovoeva, R. Ansumana, R. Suluku","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The natural ecology of Ebola virus infection remains enigmatic. No clear reservoir species has been confirmed but there is evidence of infection in a wide spectrum of mammals, including humans, non-human primates, domestic and wild ungulates and a variety of bat species, both frugivorous and insectivorous. Humans and most other species examined appear to be spillover hosts and suffer disease. Bats are the exception and are tolerant to infection in some laboratory studies. Some surveys show a low prevalence of antibodies against Zaire Ebola virus (ZEBOV) strains in bats during human outbreaks and inter-epidemic periods, and this order of mammals is considered to be the likely reservoir for the virus. Other putative sources include insects but this hypothesis is unproven in the field or laboratory. Moreover, some potential sources, such as aquatic species, have yet to be investigated. There are a number of environmental, human behavioural and ecological risk factors proposed with respect to spillover and spread. In the West African outbreak, which was unprecedented in scale and geographic spread, the source of the spillover remains unproven, although an association exists between the proposed index case and a colony of insectivorous bats. In all but a few Ebola virus disease events, spillover has only been superficially investigated and this was also the case in the West African epidemic. The authors suggest that, to address risks at the human-animal-environmental interface, using a One Health approach, more effort is needed to investigate spillover factors at the time of a ZEBOV epidemic, in addition to conducting inter-epidemic surveys in peridomestic environments. The true prevalence of ZEBOV infection in any species of bats remains unknown. Large-scale, expensive, non-randomised surveys, with low sampling numbers per species, are unlikely to provide evidence for Ebola virus reservoirs or to improve our epidemiological understanding.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"7 1","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Searching for the source of Ebola: the elusive factors driving its spillover into humans during the West African outbreak of 2013-2016.\",\"authors\":\"R. Kock, M. Begovoeva, R. Ansumana, R. Suluku\",\"doi\":\"10.20506/rst.38.1.2946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The natural ecology of Ebola virus infection remains enigmatic. No clear reservoir species has been confirmed but there is evidence of infection in a wide spectrum of mammals, including humans, non-human primates, domestic and wild ungulates and a variety of bat species, both frugivorous and insectivorous. Humans and most other species examined appear to be spillover hosts and suffer disease. Bats are the exception and are tolerant to infection in some laboratory studies. Some surveys show a low prevalence of antibodies against Zaire Ebola virus (ZEBOV) strains in bats during human outbreaks and inter-epidemic periods, and this order of mammals is considered to be the likely reservoir for the virus. Other putative sources include insects but this hypothesis is unproven in the field or laboratory. Moreover, some potential sources, such as aquatic species, have yet to be investigated. There are a number of environmental, human behavioural and ecological risk factors proposed with respect to spillover and spread. In the West African outbreak, which was unprecedented in scale and geographic spread, the source of the spillover remains unproven, although an association exists between the proposed index case and a colony of insectivorous bats. In all but a few Ebola virus disease events, spillover has only been superficially investigated and this was also the case in the West African epidemic. The authors suggest that, to address risks at the human-animal-environmental interface, using a One Health approach, more effort is needed to investigate spillover factors at the time of a ZEBOV epidemic, in addition to conducting inter-epidemic surveys in peridomestic environments. The true prevalence of ZEBOV infection in any species of bats remains unknown. Large-scale, expensive, non-randomised surveys, with low sampling numbers per species, are unlikely to provide evidence for Ebola virus reservoirs or to improve our epidemiological understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"113-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2946\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

埃博拉病毒感染的自然生态仍然是个谜。没有明确的宿主物种得到确认,但有证据表明,在广泛的哺乳动物中存在感染,包括人类、非人灵长类动物、家养和野生有蹄类动物以及各种食果和食虫的蝙蝠物种。人类和大多数其他被检查的物种似乎是外溢宿主并遭受疾病。在一些实验室研究中,蝙蝠是例外,它们对感染具有耐受性。一些调查显示,在人类暴发和疫情间期,蝙蝠中抗扎伊尔埃博拉病毒(ZEBOV)毒株抗体的流行率较低,这一目哺乳动物被认为可能是该病毒的宿主。其他可能的来源包括昆虫,但这一假设未经实地或实验室证实。此外,一些潜在的来源,如水生物种,还有待调查。在外溢和扩散方面,提出了一些环境、人类行为和生态风险因素。西非疫情在规模和地理传播上都是前所未有的,尽管所提出的指示病例与食虫蝙蝠群体之间存在关联,但其外溢源仍未得到证实。除了少数几起埃博拉病毒病事件外,对所有事件的外溢性都只进行了表面调查,西非疫情也是如此。作者建议,为了利用“同一个健康”方法解决人-动物-环境界面的风险,除了在家庭周围环境中进行流行间调查外,还需要在ZEBOV流行时更多地努力调查溢出因素。ZEBOV感染在任何种类蝙蝠中的真实流行率仍然未知。大规模、昂贵、非随机调查,每个物种的采样数量少,不太可能为埃博拉病毒库提供证据,也不太可能提高我们对流行病学的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Searching for the source of Ebola: the elusive factors driving its spillover into humans during the West African outbreak of 2013-2016.
The natural ecology of Ebola virus infection remains enigmatic. No clear reservoir species has been confirmed but there is evidence of infection in a wide spectrum of mammals, including humans, non-human primates, domestic and wild ungulates and a variety of bat species, both frugivorous and insectivorous. Humans and most other species examined appear to be spillover hosts and suffer disease. Bats are the exception and are tolerant to infection in some laboratory studies. Some surveys show a low prevalence of antibodies against Zaire Ebola virus (ZEBOV) strains in bats during human outbreaks and inter-epidemic periods, and this order of mammals is considered to be the likely reservoir for the virus. Other putative sources include insects but this hypothesis is unproven in the field or laboratory. Moreover, some potential sources, such as aquatic species, have yet to be investigated. There are a number of environmental, human behavioural and ecological risk factors proposed with respect to spillover and spread. In the West African outbreak, which was unprecedented in scale and geographic spread, the source of the spillover remains unproven, although an association exists between the proposed index case and a colony of insectivorous bats. In all but a few Ebola virus disease events, spillover has only been superficially investigated and this was also the case in the West African epidemic. The authors suggest that, to address risks at the human-animal-environmental interface, using a One Health approach, more effort is needed to investigate spillover factors at the time of a ZEBOV epidemic, in addition to conducting inter-epidemic surveys in peridomestic environments. The true prevalence of ZEBOV infection in any species of bats remains unknown. Large-scale, expensive, non-randomised surveys, with low sampling numbers per species, are unlikely to provide evidence for Ebola virus reservoirs or to improve our epidemiological understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.
期刊最新文献
Rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants: a century of progress and the future. Rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants: state of play in disease eradication efforts. The science of animal welfare in the One Health-One Welfare agenda: local solutions for global challenges. Shifting from wildlife disease threats to wildlife health. Strategic challenges in the global control of high pathogenicity avian influenza.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1