E. D. Glass, G. H. Watrous, W. T. Butz, W. Johnstone, C. W. Pierce
{"title":"牛奶在商店中的处理方法。约会市场和非约会市场的区别","authors":"E. D. Glass, G. H. Watrous, W. T. Butz, W. Johnstone, C. W. Pierce","doi":"10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New York City vs. Chicago Milk was found to be significantly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were significantly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Returns due to date or code expiration were identical for the dating and non-dating markets and so few as to be of no consequence. Birmingham vs. Montgomery Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market but the difference was not statistically significant at accepted confidence levels. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were slightly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Camden vs. Philadelphia Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating marke...","PeriodicalId":16561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of milk and food technology","volume":"223 1","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IV. MILK HANDLING PRACTICES IN STORES. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DATING AND NON-DATING MARKETS\",\"authors\":\"E. D. Glass, G. H. Watrous, W. T. Butz, W. Johnstone, C. W. Pierce\",\"doi\":\"10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New York City vs. Chicago Milk was found to be significantly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were significantly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Returns due to date or code expiration were identical for the dating and non-dating markets and so few as to be of no consequence. Birmingham vs. Montgomery Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market but the difference was not statistically significant at accepted confidence levels. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were slightly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Camden vs. Philadelphia Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating marke...\",\"PeriodicalId\":16561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of milk and food technology\",\"volume\":\"223 1\",\"pages\":\"46-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1971-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of milk and food technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of milk and food technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4315/0022-2747-34.1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
IV. MILK HANDLING PRACTICES IN STORES. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DATING AND NON-DATING MARKETS
New York City vs. Chicago Milk was found to be significantly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were significantly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Returns due to date or code expiration were identical for the dating and non-dating markets and so few as to be of no consequence. Birmingham vs. Montgomery Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating market than in the non-dating market but the difference was not statistically significant at accepted confidence levels. A higher incidence of special deliveries was noted in the dating market than in the non-dating market. Milk inventories maintained in the dating market were slightly lower than milk inventories maintained in the non-dating market. Camden vs. Philadelphia Milk was found to be slightly less available in the dating marke...
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
