提高游戏:增加影响的成本- - -关于发展效益领域成本计算的特刊导言

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Effectiveness Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19439342.2023.2171062
M. Gaarder, Johannes F. Linn
{"title":"提高游戏:增加影响的成本- - -关于发展效益领域成本计算的特刊导言","authors":"M. Gaarder, Johannes F. Linn","doi":"10.1080/19439342.2023.2171062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arguments for including cost-analysis when assessing the effectiveness and benefits of policies and interventions are compelling: in a world of limited resources, it is not enough to know whether an intervention has an effect on the desired outcomes, such as improved early-grade reading, nor even the size of the effect. Policy-makers need to know whether they can afford those effects, whether they could have achieved them more cheaply through other interventions, and what the opportunity costs are across other outcomes, sectors, and interventions. For policymakers in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) this is all the more important as the potential benefit from scarce resources is greater. It is therefore quite astounding that across the international development field only about one in five impact evaluations include a good cost-effectiveness analysis, thus missing the opportunity to respond to the questions often foremost on policy-makers minds (Brown and Tanner, 2019). The study by Browne and Tanner (2019) points out a number of factors that limit cost analysis integration into impact evaluations. Correct and comprehensive costing is difficult and time consuming. This is compounded by low levels of training in cost data collection and analysis methods, limited interest in cost evidence from the journals that publish impact evaluations, and limited demand from funders that cost analysis be integrated into funded impact evaluations. Indeed, while ex-ante cost-effectiveness analysis was quite frequently used in international financial institutions in the early 1990’s to justify development investments, it had gone out of fashion just as the impact evaluation field was taking off. This special issue is dedicated to cost-analysis in the context of impact evaluation, as the explosion of the impact evaluation field is an extraordinary opportunity to finally get real-time, expost estimates of cost-effectiveness across interventions. The seven papers included in this special issue bring to the fore some common themes. They help us understand the challenges of collecting cost data and offer guidance on how to meet them. They provide an insight into a variety of approaches used and where more needs to be done. Below we start by briefly summarising the seven papers in this special volume. We then go on to highlight some additional costing questions related to projects and to the scaling of projects that would benefit from further attention in future costing research.","PeriodicalId":46384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","volume":"124 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upping the game: adding costs to impacts an introduction to the special issue on costing in the field of development effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"M. Gaarder, Johannes F. Linn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439342.2023.2171062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The arguments for including cost-analysis when assessing the effectiveness and benefits of policies and interventions are compelling: in a world of limited resources, it is not enough to know whether an intervention has an effect on the desired outcomes, such as improved early-grade reading, nor even the size of the effect. Policy-makers need to know whether they can afford those effects, whether they could have achieved them more cheaply through other interventions, and what the opportunity costs are across other outcomes, sectors, and interventions. For policymakers in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) this is all the more important as the potential benefit from scarce resources is greater. It is therefore quite astounding that across the international development field only about one in five impact evaluations include a good cost-effectiveness analysis, thus missing the opportunity to respond to the questions often foremost on policy-makers minds (Brown and Tanner, 2019). The study by Browne and Tanner (2019) points out a number of factors that limit cost analysis integration into impact evaluations. Correct and comprehensive costing is difficult and time consuming. This is compounded by low levels of training in cost data collection and analysis methods, limited interest in cost evidence from the journals that publish impact evaluations, and limited demand from funders that cost analysis be integrated into funded impact evaluations. Indeed, while ex-ante cost-effectiveness analysis was quite frequently used in international financial institutions in the early 1990’s to justify development investments, it had gone out of fashion just as the impact evaluation field was taking off. This special issue is dedicated to cost-analysis in the context of impact evaluation, as the explosion of the impact evaluation field is an extraordinary opportunity to finally get real-time, expost estimates of cost-effectiveness across interventions. The seven papers included in this special issue bring to the fore some common themes. They help us understand the challenges of collecting cost data and offer guidance on how to meet them. They provide an insight into a variety of approaches used and where more needs to be done. Below we start by briefly summarising the seven papers in this special volume. We then go on to highlight some additional costing questions related to projects and to the scaling of projects that would benefit from further attention in future costing research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2023.2171062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2023.2171062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在评估政策和干预措施的有效性和效益时,包括成本分析的论点是令人信服的:在资源有限的世界里,仅仅知道干预措施是否对预期结果有影响是不够的,比如提高早期阅读水平,甚至不知道影响的大小。政策制定者需要知道他们是否能够负担得起这些影响,他们是否可以通过其他干预措施以更低的成本实现这些影响,以及其他结果、部门和干预措施的机会成本是多少。对于低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的政策制定者来说,这一点尤为重要,因为稀缺资源的潜在收益更大。因此,令人震惊的是,在整个国际发展领域,只有大约五分之一的影响评估包括良好的成本效益分析,从而错过了回答决策者通常最关心的问题的机会(Brown和Tanner, 2019)。Browne和Tanner(2019)的研究指出了一些限制成本分析融入影响评估的因素。正确和全面的成本核算是困难和耗时的。成本数据收集和分析方法方面的培训水平较低,对发表影响评估的期刊的成本证据的兴趣有限,以及资助者对将成本分析纳入资助的影响评估的要求有限,这些都使这种情况更加复杂。的确,虽然在1990年代初国际金融机构经常使用事前成本效益分析来证明发展投资的合理性,但随着影响评价领域的兴起,这种分析已经过时了。本期特刊致力于影响评估背景下的成本分析,因为影响评估领域的爆炸式增长是最终获得干预措施成本效益实时评估的绝佳机会。本期特刊所载的七篇论文突出了一些共同的主题。它们帮助我们理解收集成本数据的挑战,并就如何应对这些挑战提供指导。它们提供了对所使用的各种方法的见解,以及需要做更多工作的地方。下面,我们首先简要总结一下本特辑中的七篇论文。然后,我们继续强调一些与项目和项目规模相关的额外成本问题,这些问题将受益于未来成本研究的进一步关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Upping the game: adding costs to impacts an introduction to the special issue on costing in the field of development effectiveness
The arguments for including cost-analysis when assessing the effectiveness and benefits of policies and interventions are compelling: in a world of limited resources, it is not enough to know whether an intervention has an effect on the desired outcomes, such as improved early-grade reading, nor even the size of the effect. Policy-makers need to know whether they can afford those effects, whether they could have achieved them more cheaply through other interventions, and what the opportunity costs are across other outcomes, sectors, and interventions. For policymakers in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) this is all the more important as the potential benefit from scarce resources is greater. It is therefore quite astounding that across the international development field only about one in five impact evaluations include a good cost-effectiveness analysis, thus missing the opportunity to respond to the questions often foremost on policy-makers minds (Brown and Tanner, 2019). The study by Browne and Tanner (2019) points out a number of factors that limit cost analysis integration into impact evaluations. Correct and comprehensive costing is difficult and time consuming. This is compounded by low levels of training in cost data collection and analysis methods, limited interest in cost evidence from the journals that publish impact evaluations, and limited demand from funders that cost analysis be integrated into funded impact evaluations. Indeed, while ex-ante cost-effectiveness analysis was quite frequently used in international financial institutions in the early 1990’s to justify development investments, it had gone out of fashion just as the impact evaluation field was taking off. This special issue is dedicated to cost-analysis in the context of impact evaluation, as the explosion of the impact evaluation field is an extraordinary opportunity to finally get real-time, expost estimates of cost-effectiveness across interventions. The seven papers included in this special issue bring to the fore some common themes. They help us understand the challenges of collecting cost data and offer guidance on how to meet them. They provide an insight into a variety of approaches used and where more needs to be done. Below we start by briefly summarising the seven papers in this special volume. We then go on to highlight some additional costing questions related to projects and to the scaling of projects that would benefit from further attention in future costing research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Does the small business programme benefit self-employed workers? Evidence from Nicaragua Grow the pie, or have it? Using machine learning to impact heterogeneity in the Ultra-poor graduation model How do patent subsidies drive SMEs to patent? Evidence from China Impact of cash transfer on food accessibility and calorie-intake in Pakistan Self-selection versus population-based sampling for evaluation of an agronomy training program in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1